|
By:
That isn't a good whinge
|
|
By:
i agree. unless you include the words 'feckin cheating scum' at some point then your post doesnt even qualify as a whinge. If you phone BF customer services they will email you the correct format for writing a whinge-post.
|
|
By:
Just a thought
You made 77.5% profit in a few minutes.. Most savers will be dead waiting to accrue as much interest as that. |
|
By:
kohaku...hows that little gold nugget doing....
whats the stats now...ive been away since we last spoke on here |
|
By:
fallenangel, thanks for the advice!
|
|
By:
"I won't be betting with Betfair any more. But I will keep my account open this time, just so that I can have a good whinge on this forum."
As you've made your intentions clear I'd be quite happy for betfair to close your account and donate your funds to charity. |
|
By:
No, I don't want that. When I said that I won't be betting with Betfair anymore, I didn't necessarily mean for ever and ever. But I certainly won't be betting with Betfair again in the near future...except for the St Leger.
|
|
By:
use BF for your 'cover' bets and a different exchange for your main bet.
for example. if you expect team A to win or draw but also want to cover the 0-1 loss, then back the win/draw somewhere else and back the 0-1 loss on here. assuming that your cover bets lose more than they win then your P&L on BF will decrease and you will move away from the PCharge. |
|
By:
fallenangel, what's the point in having those bets if you assume they are long term losers ?
|
|
By:
they are not separate bets. they are part of a larger bet.
please tell me that you understand this and that you are really fishing!! |
|
By:
I understand what you are saying , but what is the point in putting that part on if you assume they will be losers ?
|
|
By:
because I think it is still a possible result of the match, be it a small possibility.
what I do is cover what I believe are all the possible results on a match, and if that gives me a good return then I place the bets. I am not assuming the 0-1 score will loss. I think it is the least likely of my bets to win, but if my research says it is a possible result then I will back it as cover. however, as I think it is the least likely of my bets to win, then I am suggesting placing it with BF if I wanted to bring my P&L down. |
|
By:
Ok I understand all this, but I don't see the point in putting on bets that you assume will lose in the long run. This means you are putting bets on that you "know" have negative value.
|
|
By:
...but that 'negative' part of the bet is outweighed by the profits made from the winning part of the bet.
When I bet on a match I usually place 5 separate bets which are part of a larger bet which pays around 7% profit. 4 of those bets will lose, only one will win. which ever one wins I get an overall return of 7% profit. if I knew which would be the losing parts of the bets, then obviously I wouldnt place them and would get a much higher return than 7% profit. all I can say about the PCharge, is that I have won enough to put me over the PCharge level, but because I place the 'less likely' to win parts of my bets on BF and the 'more likely' to win parts on other exchanges I have never had to pay the PCharge. if I didnt place the 'less likely' to win parts of my bet then I would not have done as well. Its down to the maths really mate. anyhow, I wish you luck, and hope that a few winners head your way this weekend. |
|
By:
Most of my betting is now on the other exchange. But ante post laying is not sufficiently covered on that one, so I still need Betfair for this.
|
|
By:
i agree with you. i still need BF for certain bets. but have managed to get my comm down on other exchange to very low level.
anyhow, how would we live without the forum ![]() |
|
By:
Let's get down to Betfair HQ in Hammersmith and hurt the members of staff who are responsible for implementing the Premium Charge.
|
|
By:
I agree with you.
|
|
By:
Eddie the eagle Joined: 01 Feb 04
Replies: 1787 27 Aug 10 15:31 Ok I understand all this, but I don't see the point in putting on bets that you assume will lose in the long run. This means you are putting bets on that you "know" have negative value. Sometimes a bet that has a negative expectancy taken in isolation, can improve the overall positive expectancy of a series of bets if you are betting on a number of selections in the same market, but I assume you're already aware of that. |
|
By:
^
That might not be completely accurate, but it's defintely the case for optimal growth (kelly), negative expectation bets can make sense. |