Forums

General Betting

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
.Marksman.
26 Aug 10 23:30
Joined:
Date Joined: 13 Jul 10
| Topic/replies: 2,123 | Blogger: .Marksman.'s blog
After a long absence from Betfair, I had my first bet with my new account last week. My gross win was £12.40.  I paid 0.62 in commission and on top of that, I still had to pay another £2.17 in Premium Charge. So I was charged at 22.5%.  I won't be betting with Betfair any more. But I will keep my account open this time, just so that I can have a good whinge on this forum.Laugh

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 20
By:
catfloppo
When: 26 Aug 10 23:41
That isn't a good whinge
By:
fallenangel
When: 27 Aug 10 10:25
i agree. unless you include the words 'feckin cheating scum' at some point then your post doesnt even qualify as a whinge. If you phone BF customer services they will email you the correct format for writing a whinge-post.
By:
kohaku
When: 27 Aug 10 11:10
Just a thought

You made 77.5% profit in a few minutes..

Most savers will be dead waiting to accrue as much interest as that.
By:
freddiewilliams
When: 27 Aug 10 11:28
kohaku...hows that little gold nugget doing....
whats the stats now...ive been away since we last spoke on here
By:
.Marksman.
When: 27 Aug 10 12:06
fallenangel, thanks for the advice!
By:
Fred!
When: 27 Aug 10 13:18
"I won't be betting with Betfair any more. But I will keep my account open this time, just so that I can have a good whinge on this forum."

As you've made your intentions clear I'd be quite happy for betfair to close your account and donate your funds to charity.
By:
.Marksman.
When: 27 Aug 10 14:29
No, I don't want that. When I said that I won't be betting with Betfair anymore, I didn't necessarily mean for ever and ever. But I certainly won't be betting with Betfair again in the near future...except for the St Leger.
By:
fallenangel
When: 27 Aug 10 15:07
use BF for your 'cover' bets and a different exchange for your main bet.
for example. if you expect team A to win or draw but also want to cover the 0-1 loss, then back the win/draw somewhere else and back the 0-1 loss on here.
assuming that your cover bets lose more than they win then your P&L on BF will decrease and you will move away from the PCharge.
By:
Eddie the eagle
When: 27 Aug 10 15:14
fallenangel, what's the point in having those bets if you assume they are long term losers ?
By:
fallenangel
When: 27 Aug 10 15:16
they are not separate bets. they are part of a larger bet.
please tell me that you understand this and that you are really fishing!!
By:
Eddie the eagle
When: 27 Aug 10 15:19
I understand what you are saying , but what is the point in putting that part on if you assume they will be losers ?
By:
fallenangel
When: 27 Aug 10 15:26
because I think it is still a possible result of the match, be it a small possibility.
what I do is cover what I believe are all the possible results on a match, and if that gives me a good return then I place the bets.
I am not assuming the 0-1 score will loss. I think it is the least likely of my bets to win, but if my research says it is a possible result then I will back it as cover.
however, as I think it is the least likely of my bets to win, then I am suggesting placing it with BF if I wanted to bring my P&L down.
By:
Eddie the eagle
When: 27 Aug 10 15:31
Ok I understand all this, but I don't see the point in putting on bets that you assume will lose in the long run.  This means you are putting bets on that you "know" have negative value.
By:
fallenangel
When: 27 Aug 10 15:39
...but that 'negative' part of the bet is outweighed by the profits made from the winning part of the bet.
When I bet on a match I usually place 5 separate bets which are part of a larger bet which pays around 7% profit.
4 of those bets will lose, only one will win. which ever one wins I get an overall return of 7% profit.
if I knew which would be the losing parts of the bets, then obviously I wouldnt place them and would get a much higher return than 7% profit.

all I can say about the PCharge, is that I have won enough to put me over the PCharge level, but because I place the 'less likely' to win parts of my bets on BF and the 'more likely' to win parts on other exchanges I have never had to pay the PCharge.

if I didnt place the 'less likely' to win parts of my bet then I would not have done as well. Its down to the maths really mate.

anyhow, I wish you luck, and hope that a few winners head your way this weekend.
By:
.Marksman.
When: 27 Aug 10 15:47
Most of my betting is now on the other exchange. But ante post laying is not sufficiently covered on that one, so I still need Betfair for this.
By:
fallenangel
When: 27 Aug 10 15:49
i agree with you. i still need BF for certain bets. but have managed to get my comm down on other exchange to very low level.
anyhow, how would we live without the forum Cry
By:
Avocado
When: 27 Aug 10 23:58
Let's get down to Betfair HQ in Hammersmith and hurt the members of staff who are responsible for implementing the Premium Charge.
By:
paul_sw
When: 28 Aug 10 02:32
I agree with you.
By:
The Investor
When: 28 Aug 10 02:37
Eddie the eagle Joined: 01 Feb 04
Replies: 1787 27 Aug 10 15:31 
Ok I understand all this, but I don't see the point in putting on bets that you assume will lose in the long run.  This means you are putting bets on that you "know" have negative value.


Sometimes a bet that has a negative expectancy taken in isolation, can improve the overall positive expectancy  of a series of bets if you are betting on a number of selections in the same market, but I assume you're already aware of that.
By:
The Investor
When: 28 Aug 10 02:38
^
That might not be completely accurate, but it's defintely the case for optimal growth (kelly), negative expectation bets can make sense.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com