Forums

General Betting

Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Almagro is a no no
17 Apr 10 21:10
Joined:
Date Joined: 13 Jan 10
| Topic/replies: 5,879 | Blogger: Almagro is a no no's blog
can anyone explain please?
Pause Switch to Standard View Using kelly with tennis
Show More
Loading...
Report tobermory April 17, 2010 9:17 PM BST
http://www.seriousbet.co.uk/calculators/kelly_staking

eg

you have bank of £100

you think Almagro should be 1.90

He can be backed @2.0 ( but you pay 5% commission)

Value index = 102.63

Stake= 2.77% of bank which is £2.77
Report tobermory April 17, 2010 9:18 PM BST
But if you thought he he was a 1.80 chance then the recommended stake is calculated as £8.76
Report Almagro is a no no April 17, 2010 9:27 PM BST
thanks mate
Report tobermory April 17, 2010 9:37 PM BST
pricing up matches accurately and consistently is the hard bit
Report beetle April 17, 2010 10:21 PM BST
Kelly only works if you have a very good idea of what your long term edge is. If you are just guessing you will get screwed.
Report Zola's Back Heel April 18, 2010 8:08 PM BST
It is an excellent weapon in the gamblers arsenal. But unless you are experienced at using it you can take yourself out.
Report Rafael Nadal April 18, 2010 8:12 PM BST
I've always been wary of it, but tried it anyway.

I put in available price as 3.0 and my assessment as 2.0 ...... it said put nearly half your bank on it.


Did I do something wrong?
Report Zola's Back Heel April 18, 2010 8:15 PM BST
I prefer to use it in reverse.
Report Rafael Nadal April 18, 2010 8:20 PM BST
Twice my bank?
Report Zola's Back Heel April 18, 2010 8:24 PM BST
No, use the formula in reverse.
Report Aga or Ula? April 18, 2010 8:40 PM BST
Rafa, nothing wrong with that, you would've doubled your bank within 52 minutes tonight ;-)
Report Aga or Ula? April 18, 2010 8:46 PM BST
seriously: using Kelly, or fractional Kelly, is a good way if you set a maximum stake in order to protect yourself from extreme overestimations of your edge
Report Rafael Nadal April 18, 2010 8:50 PM BST
All right Aga mate, you know I'm a simple level stakes, straight up guy, I'll give it a whirl, but I've had a few right now.
Report Rafael Nadal April 18, 2010 9:03 PM BST
I just can't. I'm a real long-hand merchant when it come to the maths but I'll get there eventually, but I just can't give it the perceived price angle, especially the way I bet.

You know, Aga, I price up what I think the market will be......
Report Lori April 18, 2010 9:44 PM BST
Rafael Nadal 18 Apr 20:12


I've always been wary of it, but tried it anyway.

I put in available price as 3.0 and my assessment as 2.0 ...... it said put nearly half your bank on it.


Did I do something wrong?



Yes, that should be 25%
Report Rafael Nadal April 18, 2010 9:59 PM BST
Lori.

I pu tin 3 as available, 2 as my assessment and 47% of bank is suggested as stake.
Report Lori April 18, 2010 10:12 PM BST
Win probability of 50%?

You're doing something wrong, but I can't work out what, I've done it on two other sites before my post and checked on the one you used, all came to 25% of bank fwiw (without commission)

Think you're getting exactly double the required number which is odd.

http://www.sbrforum.com/Betting+Tools/Kelly+Calculator.aspx
http://www.albionresearch.com/kelly/default.php
Report Rafael Nadal April 18, 2010 10:32 PM BST
No, I see it. I put in 2 as opposed to 50%.


Still, that is basically my staple bet, I can't be betting 25% of my bank....... but if Aga likes it I'm sure it works for most people.
Report Aga or Ula? April 18, 2010 11:00 PM BST
It works for those who are reasonably good at estimating real probabilities - others who may be successful by just seeing "this is value" without being able to quantify it are probably better off playing level stakes.

Actually, I determine my stakes by first estimating my "true odds", then determining a confidence interval - this is a completely qualitative step so don't ask me what kind of level of confidence I use, it's just an interval I feel reasinably good about. If the market's odds are outside of that interval, I'll base my stake on the boundary of the interval that's closer to the market price, implicitly acknowledging that the true odds are probably somewhere between my estimate and the market. Using these numbers, I apply quarter Kelly with a cap of 5% of my bank. I could probably play more aggressively but am comfortable with that and still do better than these guys :-) :

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-gambling-fund17-2010apr17,0,2021337.story
Report Rafael Nadal April 18, 2010 11:24 PM BST
That breaks it down better for me, Rekord, sounds very prudent.


Odd that the US authorities would allow it to be invested in knowing they were punting on Betfair.
Report Steveirll April 18, 2010 11:32 PM BST
how does this Kelly theory work ?
Report Lori April 18, 2010 11:33 PM BST
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelly_criterion
Report Lori April 18, 2010 11:33 PM BST
http://forum.sbrforum.com/handicapper-think-tank/29009-expected-value-vs-exp...
Report Steveirll April 18, 2010 11:34 PM BST
thanks lorry
Report Steveirll April 18, 2010 11:34 PM BST
wow tough to get hang off.
Report Steveirll April 18, 2010 11:34 PM BST
wow tough to get hang off.
Report Lori April 18, 2010 11:34 PM BST
2nd one is a fantastic explanation imo. Even if you don't follow the maths (many people will, many wont), the logic is really helpful to get an idea what's going on.
Report getting better April 18, 2010 11:50 PM BST
the key is to try to maximise the expected value fo the logarithm of your notional bank
Report NO is New Orleans April 19, 2010 12:32 AM BST
A very erotic name for a thread.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com