He can be backed @2.0 ( but you pay 5% commission)
Value index = 102.63
Stake= 2.77% of bank which is £2.77
http://www.seriousbet.co.uk/calculators/kelly_stakingegyou have bank of £100you think Almagro should be 1.90He can be backed @2.0 ( but you pay 5% commission)Value index = 102.63Stake= 2.77% of bank which is £2.77
I put in available price as 3.0 and my assessment as 2.0 ...... it said put nearly half your bank on it.
Did I do something wrong?
I've always been wary of it, but tried it anyway.I put in available price as 3.0 and my assessment as 2.0 ...... it said put nearly half your bank on it.Did I do something wrong?
seriously: using Kelly, or fractional Kelly, is a good way if you set a maximum stake in order to protect yourself from extreme overestimations of your edge
seriously: using Kelly, or fractional Kelly, is a good way if you set a maximum stake in order to protect yourself from extreme overestimations of your edge
I just can't. I'm a real long-hand merchant when it come to the maths but I'll get there eventually, but I just can't give it the perceived price angle, especially the way I bet.
You know, Aga, I price up what I think the market will be......
I just can't. I'm a real long-hand merchant when it come to the maths but I'll get there eventually, but I just can't give it the perceived price angle, especially the way I bet.You know, Aga, I price up what I think the market will be......
I put in available price as 3.0 and my assessment as 2.0 ...... it said put nearly half your bank on it.
Did I do something wrong?
Yes, that should be 25%
Rafael Nadal 18 Apr 20:12 I've always been wary of it, but tried it anyway.I put in available price as 3.0 and my assessment as 2.0 ...... it said put nearly half your bank on it.Did I do something wrong? Yes, that should be 25%
You're doing something wrong, but I can't work out what, I've done it on two other sites before my post and checked on the one you used, all came to 25% of bank fwiw (without commission)
Think you're getting exactly double the required number which is odd.
Win probability of 50%?You're doing something wrong, but I can't work out what, I've done it on two other sites before my post and checked on the one you used, all came to 25% of bank fwiw (without commission)Think you're getting exactly double the r
Still, that is basically my staple bet, I can't be betting 25% of my bank....... but if Aga likes it I'm sure it works for most people.
No, I see it. I put in 2 as opposed to 50%.Still, that is basically my staple bet, I can't be betting 25% of my bank....... but if Aga likes it I'm sure it works for most people.
It works for those who are reasonably good at estimating real probabilities - others who may be successful by just seeing "this is value" without being able to quantify it are probably better off playing level stakes.
Actually, I determine my stakes by first estimating my "true odds", then determining a confidence interval - this is a completely qualitative step so don't ask me what kind of level of confidence I use, it's just an interval I feel reasinably good about. If the market's odds are outside of that interval, I'll base my stake on the boundary of the interval that's closer to the market price, implicitly acknowledging that the true odds are probably somewhere between my estimate and the market. Using these numbers, I apply quarter Kelly with a cap of 5% of my bank. I could probably play more aggressively but am comfortable with that and still do better than these guys :-) :
It works for those who are reasonably good at estimating real probabilities - others who may be successful by just seeing "this is value" without being able to quantify it are probably better off playing level stakes.Actually, I determine my stakes b
That breaks it down better for me, Rekord, sounds very prudent.
Odd that the US authorities would allow it to be invested in knowing they were punting on Betfair.
That breaks it down better for me, Rekord, sounds very prudent.Odd that the US authorities would allow it to be invested in knowing they were punting on Betfair.
2nd one is a fantastic explanation imo. Even if you don't follow the maths (many people will, many wont), the logic is really helpful to get an idea what's going on.
2nd one is a fantastic explanation imo. Even if you don't follow the maths (many people will, many wont), the logic is really helpful to get an idea what's going on.