General Betting
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Decimal Odds.
This will get racing off the floor-don't make me laugh!
1.In 1987 S.I.S paid the RCA 1.4 million yet paid Bags 2 million,
during a well known trial it was acertained that Greyhounds accounted for 10% t/o and Horseracing was 90%-racing's rulers are clueless! Racing should have recieved 20 million or Bags 140k on those calculations.Racing did not and to this day still has no idea of the worth of pictures-the balance of power is not who owns the pictures it's who delivers them whilst you have sis and their surrogates in control reaping the rewards then only racing and the punter will suffer.
2.Racing "PLC" MUST deliver it's own pictures and data to all betting shops mimick what sis does and charge every betting shop the same price, did you know that the ladcrooks pay £12 per year for the data to their offices, yet the indies pay £2500 per year, the Racehorse owners own the data, they buy the horses, name them,pay for their upkeep without the owners their is no show!
Charge on a shop by shop basis this would generate a vast amount for racing.
3. Racing thinks it need's the big chains with advertising-The chains need racing more than racing needs them!
4.Mr Saville was on the right train, going in the right direction he just got off at the wrong station, what decimal odds will do is squeeze the margin back in favour of the chains- with the independents in terminal decline(due to this govt allowing corporate uk to rule) which will effect the profitability of turf tv,Sis will get the turf pictures back (stand on me) this will save the chains 1/2 billion over 10 years and they have absorbed the indies customers- E/W terms will be replaced with 9.0 to win and 1.8 to place screwing joe punter!
Signing off for ever.
Good night and god bless.
This will get racing off the floor-don't make me laugh!
1.In 1987 S.I.S paid the RCA 1.4 million yet paid Bags 2 million,
during a well known trial it was acertained that Greyhounds accounted for 10% t/o and Horseracing was 90%-racing's rulers are clueless! Racing should have recieved 20 million or Bags 140k on those calculations.Racing did not and to this day still has no idea of the worth of pictures-the balance of power is not who owns the pictures it's who delivers them whilst you have sis and their surrogates in control reaping the rewards then only racing and the punter will suffer.
2.Racing "PLC" MUST deliver it's own pictures and data to all betting shops mimick what sis does and charge every betting shop the same price, did you know that the ladcrooks pay £12 per year for the data to their offices, yet the indies pay £2500 per year, the Racehorse owners own the data, they buy the horses, name them,pay for their upkeep without the owners their is no show!
Charge on a shop by shop basis this would generate a vast amount for racing.
3. Racing thinks it need's the big chains with advertising-The chains need racing more than racing needs them!
4.Mr Saville was on the right train, going in the right direction he just got off at the wrong station, what decimal odds will do is squeeze the margin back in favour of the chains- with the independents in terminal decline(due to this govt allowing corporate uk to rule) which will effect the profitability of turf tv,Sis will get the turf pictures back (stand on me) this will save the chains 1/2 billion over 10 years and they have absorbed the indies customers- E/W terms will be replaced with 9.0 to win and 1.8 to place screwing joe punter!
Signing off for ever.
Good night and god bless.
Show More
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539