|
By:
easy choose your teams to lay with a maximum liability of £15
|
|
By:
sorry second part 2% profit per day
|
|
By:
After nearly 7 years on here, you have a bank of £300 and are looking for advice on the forum? Oh dear
|
|
By:
thanks. I'm thinking just to pick 5 games during the course of the week - 2% of pot profit each bet would give £30 return (not taking account of comm) per week.
Could/should 300 pot return more or should I be happy with approx £100 per month profit? I'm thinking I'd like more! Naive and greedy I guess. That is assuming all my lays are successfull! |
|
By:
just started taking notice of the forum after a long time as you point out. just wanting to get others advice thats all.
|
|
By:
bet u are my betfair twin
my bank is 297.19 and am going to lay football teams and i think i have a good way of doin it!! |
|
By:
r92 - if you ever fancy enlightening me then it would be much appreciated!!! Cheers!
|
|
By:
ok i will and more u can follow this and it shud work a treat..
|
|
By:
Bounce back theory....
Soccer teams beaten at odds on then lay their opponents in the nxt game if that bet loses lay/chase lay until that team stops losing the justification for this is that if odds on in a match a team is invariably gd enuf 2 go games without losing what u think!! |
|
By:
youve just found the holy grail
|
|
By:
botd, my advice would be keep stakes small,but keep the data on computer or paper of your system then if your system proves successful over a number of bets then apply the most profitable staking plan eg level staking,pyramid staking,kelly etc.good luck.
|
|
By:
There are some serious problems with this system. Teams don't have to be good to be odds-on. It all depends on the relative quality of the opponent. For example Burnley were odds on against Hull, as were Wigan v Wolves. In Wigan's case, their next two games were against Manchester United and Everton who were themselves both odds-on and Wigan lost them both, so you would be staking a high amount to get your money back. Would you really be laying Blackburn at 25.0 after Chelsea's odds-on defeat at Aston Villa?
|
|
By:
spot on cpfc
i fully go by what u said i havent got across all of it in my post i look at future fixtures and always target the good teams that get turned over its not perfect but when u apply judgement and future opponents to it it can be profitable any more thoughts? |
|
By:
The problem you have is that teams losing at odds-on are either not that great, and may then face far better teams, or they ARE that great, but you have to lay at huge odds - e.g. Chelsea played Blackburn after losing at odds-on and Blackburn were 25.0. That's a high lay price, even if Chelsea did win easily.
Your system might well work better in a more even league than the Premier League but I don't have the stats to hand. It could be worth tracking for a while though. It's an interesting idea. Personally, I prefer to focus on teams that are playing similar strength teams. I have the Premier League broken into four groups and find value on the intra-group games. http://green-all-over.blogspot.com/2009/10/weekly-round-up.html |
|
By:
Doesn't matter how much you win, so long as you win.
|
|
By:
Actually, the amount you win is rather important. Winning takes time and effort, and if you're winning £1 a week for 20 hours, most would consider that a poor return, but if you're winning £1,000 a week for the same effort, that's not too shabby. Of course if you're losing after a year or so on here, then you should probably just give it up.
|
|
By:
thanks for some good insights. I got a good return laying sheff utd ht/ft on monday
took a massive hit on laying westham ht / ft against villa on Wednesday. laying man u ht / ft this wkend. |