|
By:
This is the interesting opposite of the other thread regarding low risk betting and poss the road to go down.
|
|
By:
If I had confidence that it would produce some profit, I'd already be betting it though surely?
|
|
By:
well yes, but one tends to take the approaches with greater margin cause you never quite know what your edge is
|
|
By:
Lori, that would depend if you look for high or low risk trades. With the Pc charge ammendment it may make sense to bet high risk markets if you feel you will make enough to pay the commission and leave you flat on them, offsetting PC charges.
|
|
By:
I try to look for anything that makes a profit already. Adding more profit making would be a no brainer if it were that easy sadly.
|
|
By:
Why waste time messing about in these markets to reduce your pc by nominal amounts - might as well do a schalke challenge if you're that bored
|
|
By:
surely you'd be better served sticking to the markets that make you the most profits and adjusting your approach slightly
|
|
By:
I think the point is that even in markets where you make no profit after comm, there is still value and maybe that can be incorporated into your approach, just a thought.
|
|
By:
Curlywurly, I took your approach during the previous pc charge but now things are less clear.
|
|
By:
well a few years ago I dabbled in stuff that had high churn rates but some merit but put them on the back burner cause of the ups and downs.
- the pc looming one day gives some incentive to think about digging them out and have another look at them. |
|
By:
fair enough if you've got a bot
if you're doing it manually then you could be spending dangerous amounts of time on here for scant reward then you might not be sharp enough when it really counts |
|
By:
Curlywurly, I agree with that post, it's a balance. I don't use bots but I don't have that many bets, mostly high margin.
|
|
By:
I guess that's the difference, I'm already to the point where there's not enough hours in the day
|