Football
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
27 Apr 26
12:19
Joined:
Date Joined:
11 Aug 21
I'm sorry but at 1.45 to win it, City are free money.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 65
|
By:
Chelsea needs a proven winner to get them over the line.
They should employ John Terry to manage the team for the final. I can see him now, holding the trophy in a full Chelsea sheepskin coat. |
|
By:
city should win
|
|
By:
Completely agree, they're 1.47 now and that's a gift.
|
|
By:
Chavs cup final is against
SPURS  |
|
By:
Chelsea are good at cups. If bothered.
|
|
By:
BTTS
|
|
By:
Chelsea have lost their last 4 FA Cup finals (including 3 in a row).
City have lost their last two FA Cup finals in a row going for a third. |
|
By:
Chelsea are world champions should be easy for them.,
|
|
By:
Betball could be involved
|
|
By:
Wayne Rooney looks more and more like a fat Morrissey
|
|
By:
Is Micha Richards on drugs?
Pep is a Mancunian! Yeah, sure. Bet he has a pie barm for lunch |
|
By:
Whats with Bradford choir
|
|
By:
a few bob on Chelsea at 5.1, City are beatable.
|
|
By:
Time out, lol
|
|
By:
miles offside
|
|
By:
Didn't need to be, either.
|
|
By:
went backwards that shot
|
|
By:
Yawn fest when compered to the Celtic Hearts game.
|
|
By:
at least the result is not pre-determined
|
|
By:
2 time outs, and they are knackered after 38 minutes
Citeh blowing hard |
|
By:
Chelsea playing well
|
|
By:
man city have had
mamrmouh chance Alfie cross across box alfie diallowed goal somenya hot/miss hit orielly x from byeline rodri header at back post but shearer and loony on comm on BBC think chelsea have had the better chances |
|
By:
Shearer not watching the game, is he, lol
|
|
By:
Chelsea have had a good spell, but not created any clear cut chances, never mind looked like scoring.
|
|
By:
not a pen
|
|
By:
shoulder to shoulder
thats more of a penalty than 99% of the handballs that are given. No intention of playing the ball. If that happens in the middle of the park you get a free kick |
|
By:
add
ALFIE SOT doke dangerous X to back post chavs o,12 XG city o,44 XG now rooney trying to convince you chav looked more dangerous] their absolute clueless Muppets |
|
By:
Rather watch
The march on the news than this Borefest Sideways backwards |
|
By:
True if someone was knocked off the ball like that and went on to score goal would be disallowed
|
|
By:
nah, defender had enough strength and leverage to brush him off the ball, would've been very soft if given.
|
|
By:
these muppets on BBC judging CHAVS as though their some plucky guys from the dog n duck not a billion quid assembled football team
|
|
By:
obstruction, indirect free kick inside the area if i was in charge of the rules
|
|
By:
the billion quid was spent on 30 players. the first eleven is only worth 330 million
|
|
By:
both Shearer and Rooney described the City offside as "just offside", even though it was a good yard. How can these guys profess to judge free kicks, pens, offsides etc when the margin is an armpit or a toenail?
|
|
By:
It's a foul, innit
Shoulder to shoulder, lol, must be watching same match as shearer Maybe var correct to stay out, go with ref view. |
|
By:
Look to pass ball backwards all the time
|
|
By:
good chance
|
|
By:
Good to see full back overlap to take defenders out
who are glued to doku... |
|
By:
Citeh different game plan, now they have ball player
In middle on for marmoosh. |