|
By:
Every week in the championship we get dodgy decisions , clear offsides not given, penalties, red cards the lot These are demonstrably wrong when you see the efl highlights. . Many fans around me would be happy to have var and all its time consuming aspects rather than lose because of gormless officials.
|
|
By:
They have VAR in the 3rd division in Italy.
|
|
By:
Shearer summed it up; the officials now are that reliant on getting backed up by VAR that their decisions are getting poorer
|
|
By:
Var should have opposite effect in that refs want
to get it right so var doesn't embarrass them. If they are really doing nowt and handing game to var to referee, then it's shameful. |
|
By:
The officials last night certainly never crowned themselves in glory
some would call it corrupt; at best it was a bad night at the office |
|
By:
I don't think it was corrupt, as they made plenty
of errors in our favour too. Ref and near side lino were appalling |
|
By:
2 offside goals and a handball in box
When they really should have got their heeds together. |
|
By:
Var should be kept,but got rid off.
No var ref, Just the on field ref checking his decision at the monitor,with no Gary Neville commentary telling him what he thinks. Bad decisions should be checked,but var refs,ganging up on on field ref,saying,well we think it was a foul. The best guy to decide is the on field,once he’s checked it on a replay. Why have 2 idiots when 1 will do. |
|
By:
It's taken a while but I see the eradication of VAR at some point, just get the sense that the anti revolution is beginning to gather a little pace.
|
|
By:
Not for me duffy, they may streamline it, but I believe it's here to stay, especially with the earlier PL votes.
|
|
By:
shearers a Muppet who like many others doesn't no the rules just his intepration of the rules,Liam ROSENIOR manager of a multi billion pound football business had a rant on live TV showing the world he had absolutely no idea what the new handball rule was
|
|
By:
Watching football can be an art form, and it's annoying
to watch on TV and hear pundits spouting their interpretation of rules, and them being often wrong. Why don't they get an expert on the rules to explain to the pundits what the rules actually are. Correct them live on TV if necessary, then the bloke down the pub will understand too. |
|
By:
The Villa v Newc tie showed that you could have reviews without a formal VAR set up. Everything clear and obvious from normal TV pics/angles, which is what we were told VAR would be limited to. Just an official wired up to the ref telling him that was clearly offside, that was clearly inside the box etc. The 4th official could do it with a tablet computer in minimal time.
|
|
By:
when rules are explained most managers, ex players, fans problems arnt with the reffs/decisions but with the actual rule,but don't realise we,ve usually arrived at this rule because the Same people didn't like the previous rule
|
|
By:
Just wondering what rules the muppet shearer doesnt know from saturdays var shambles
|
|
By:
The problem comes, and will continue because whatever you do to the rules the interpretation of said rules is subjective, one set of officials will always see it in a different way, to that end the whole purpose of VAR is rendered pointless, you may as well go back to the officials on the pitch, sometimes they'll get it right, sometimes not....just like VAR.
|
|
By:
Lurka is correct.
If its obvious off TV then get it right Don't bother with slide rules and stick with ref otherwise. |