Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
comingupthehill
25 Oct 25 22:24
Joined:
Date Joined: 10 Jul 05
| Topic/replies: 7,966 | Blogger: comingupthehill's blog
Who clearly know what they are doing,forcing their views on the VAR public.
Completely ignoring when a young black man is attacked inside the penalty box,brushes over it.
Stating it’s 50/50 within seconds,following trumps lead,saying there are good tackles on both sides.

Then spends 10 mins trying to get a perfectly good goal overturned because a player slightly brushed a players shirt.

Determined to stop people who paid his wages for years from waving flags,by forcing his VAR views on us.

Not happy with letting the ruling bodies decide on the correct course of action,he protests loudly,creating unrest and
Instability.

We need to get back to a more fairer analysis of incidents.

To bring the country together accepting the rulings of the referees.
Pause Switch to Standard View Middle aged white commentators.
Show More
Loading...
Report comingupthehill October 26, 2025 12:47 AM BST
So the amad penalty.

The ball slightly brushed the back of the heel of the defenders boot,so he didn’t play the ball,the ball played him.

Given the var verdicts,all you need to do,is try and graze the ball,then rugby tackle the player,and they can’t give a penalty.

Like the pixel offside,we are not at varnish touching ball.var is micro anyalising decisions down to millimetres.

Even. Cricket allows logic,more than 50% of the ball must be hitting the stumps.

Racings going this way,with the osin professional foul.
Report comingupthehill October 26, 2025 1:02 AM BST
Neville even missed the back heel brush.

But within 2 seconds ,he instantly screamed 50/50 tackle ,no pen.
When basically amad had been hacked down.
Luckily for the var ref,he could agree with Neville because of the varnish touch of boot and ball leather,thus escaping the pressure of daring to go against Neville’s instant view( remember he’s the furthest away person in the ground,in the roof).of just a 50/50 tackle,not enough for a penalty.

Thank god this pen was quickly dismissed,so this left loads of time,to endlessly moan about Luke shaws slight tug of the shirt ,weak enough not to affect the player.we know this,because Neville wanted replay after replay trying to get the goal cancelled.
No doubt he’s started a private prosecution of the f.a.to get this goal overturned.

Or was it .

I’m sorry about my twitter spat,I’ll pile in on United to make everyone like me again.
Report nineteen points October 26, 2025 8:25 AM GMT
CUTH,thats why i wonder if VAR studio has the same commentary as us.Plenty times these commentators/influencers screem down tv a decision depending on which way it would affect there team.
Report lurka October 26, 2025 11:21 AM GMT
You think Neville up in the gantry can't see the same pics we do despite commentating on replays as we are watching them?
Report nineteen points October 26, 2025 11:24 AM GMT
No,the folk in the VAR studio,thats why i am saying Neville could be trying ti influence them.
Report lurka October 26, 2025 11:44 AM GMT
I was responding to CUTH but Neville went against his team both times, so I doubt he was trying to influence them even if they can hear him.
Report LoyalHoncho October 26, 2025 11:49 AM GMT
“following Trumps lead”.  Laugh
Report comingupthehill October 26, 2025 2:53 PM GMT
He called the amad penalty,instantly,within 2 seconds,before he could see a replay.
50/50 tackle no pen.

Not only was that wrong,it wasn’t given for another reason.
I don’t think they showed replay,quickly moved on.

But he wouldn’t let the Luke shaw slight shirt tug go,5/6 replays,still saying a fouls 10 mins after var had ruled.everytime 2 players get close,one of them is holding a shirt,
They tend to say,not enough there,player went down too easy.

He blatantly called both decisions wrong,too early,before seeing a replay.

Me thinks

Most viewers want United to loose,Neville is on a apology tour,so he just shouted what he thinks most viewers were shouting,so they d say,he’s bang on Neville,can’t believe var,always favour United.
Ironically a bit like farage,feeding his base red  meat,he knows is total crap.
Report comingupthehill October 26, 2025 3:20 PM GMT
On up in gantry,same pictures.
He called the amad penalty,instantly,2 seconds,no replay,50/50 tackle he shouted.
It wasn’t even not given for that,so he got it right for wrong reason,just no pen no matter what.
I don’t remember seeing a replay,and we quickly moved on,

Then the Luke shaw,slight shirt pull,he lingered on this for 10/15mins,refusing to accept var,even though every time players get close they push,tug shirts.
What do commentators say.theres not enough in that.

He wasn’t trying to influence var.

Me thinks it was,more self preservation.
He’s on an apology tour after his flag rant.

Most viewers want United to lose,so he was playing to the crowd,
As the anti man United viewers scream at tv over every decision,Neville just agreeing with them,to curry favour.

It’s ironic,Neville been resorted farage tactics to gain popularity.throwing red meat to the public knowing they ll nod along in agreement.

Yet 2 var refs disagreed,he dosent usually get it this wrong.but on a day he was entered into the hall of fame,he’s rowing back his comments.
So jumping up and down instantly before seeing a replay,to please the crowd his all part of it.

How long before he shouts ,stop the boats.

The amad foul was a pen,no one. Hold see the tinniest of touches on the defenders heel,still should be a pen

The shaw tug,minor.

He didn’t get these wrong for no other reason than,save the Gary Neville brand.
Report LoyalHoncho October 26, 2025 4:03 PM GMT
Haven’t got the energy to begin to concoct such posts.  Or read them.
Report comingupthehill October 26, 2025 4:32 PM GMT
Great scheduling,Gary after being the new instant photo caller for the BHA,could get over from Aintree to the Everton match.

Let’s see what var pearls of wisdom,he spots instantly,who needs replays anyway.
Report comingupthehill October 26, 2025 4:57 PM GMT
Neville,

They’re having a good luck at this.he offers no opinion.
It’s a 50/50 decision,so therefore ,always favour more goals,attacking sides.

Simple.
Report comingupthehill October 26, 2025 4:59 PM GMT
We are here again.

Micro analysing millimetre decisions.everyone turning into professors,determined to find any minuscule of error,to justify their decision,to show how clever they are.
Report lurka October 26, 2025 11:31 PM GMT
If Amad actually followed the ball, ie left, he'd have been tripped by the outstretched leg and gotten his pen. Instead he decided to run straight into the Brighton player and the contact is on the knee. You shouldn't get a penalty for that - he was looking for it. If the ref had given it I doubt the VAR would have got involved and I don't blame him for not getting involved here either.

It looked like he was looking for it, same with Gakpo, same with the Shaw shirt pull. Glad to see it too as they'd prob all be given the last few years.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com