Football
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
1=Who told you that you could not win gambling?
2=Who told you that you can not be a professional gambler?
now go and prove to them that they were WRONG,WRONG,WRONG.
2=Who told you that you can not be a professional gambler?
now go and prove to them that they were WRONG,WRONG,WRONG.
Show More
Relying on the 2:30 at Fontwell to pay for your heating is a great plan 
I was hitching on the M6 in the 90's and was picked up by an odd couple. We talked about gambling and where it was going at the time. They both said it was a mugs game - how I've proved Fred and Denise so very wrong.
I was thinking you meant Fred and Rose !! They used to pick up hitchhikers ,was struggling to make the connection with gambling !
There was a young boy from Argentina who was too small to play football.Everyone said "that boy will get hurt he is far too small."
but one day his granny said to him"don't mind what others say ,LIONEL,you go out there and show the world how good you are at football"
but one day his granny said to him"don't mind what others say ,LIONEL,you go out there and show the world how good you are at football"
I thought from the thread title it was likely a brassneck post.
I remember an article in the Racing Post after the switch to GPT, rather than tax on turnover (maybe about 2000/2001) from a supposed professional gambler, arguing that if you weren't a professional gambler already you weren't going to be one/hadn't got what it takes (at least that was the impression it left on me). I recall thinking how full of himself he appeared in the article and how his argument was completely flawed.
Not having had full time employment since 2002, I often question how difficult was it, and think back to that article in the Racing Post by Peter Thomas. (I just Googled him to see if IIRC, and I even recognise his picture a quarter of a century later.
I remember an article in the Racing Post after the switch to GPT, rather than tax on turnover (maybe about 2000/2001) from a supposed professional gambler, arguing that if you weren't a professional gambler already you weren't going to be one/hadn't got what it takes (at least that was the impression it left on me). I recall thinking how full of himself he appeared in the article and how his argument was completely flawed.
Not having had full time employment since 2002, I often question how difficult was it, and think back to that article in the Racing Post by Peter Thomas. (I just Googled him to see if IIRC, and I even recognise his picture a quarter of a century later.
At the time snowy i did manage to offend the entire student union and their silly 'fetish' night by going (basically as the story was breaking) as the victims of the Wests and saying my fetish was necrophilia. There was a plane crash a few days before and we were going to go as them so basically had all the props ready. They refused to let us in but I appealed to the other necrophiliacs in the room and we won the day.
How I've proved those non gambling non necrophiliac idiots wrong over the years!
How I've proved those non gambling non necrophiliac idiots wrong over the years!
beats the usual "What the death of my entire family taught me about efficient project management"
OK,some gamblers don,t know this.=THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A LAST RACE.
"It will serve you well,if you remember this fact alone "
"It will serve you well,if you remember this fact alone "
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539