Football
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
For 1,000 days he has had FA Charges of spot fixing against him.
Finally.the morons at the FA have cleared him.
What an utter disgrace the FA are to have dragged this ridiculous case on.
I hope that the FA are sued for bundles.
They couldn't run a Raffle
Finally.the morons at the FA have cleared him.
What an utter disgrace the FA are to have dragged this ridiculous case on.
I hope that the FA are sued for bundles.
They couldn't run a Raffle
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 13
|
By:
1000 days might sound good but the true number is closer to 400.
Listen to Simon Jordan's reasoning on why there is huge risks involved in suing the FA. It was an FA panel which cleared Hennessey of making a nazi salute. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47946382 |
|
By:
Nevertheless,the FA brought charges that were unproven.
It's outrageous that they the let this crock of a persecution continue |
|
By:
Not to mention the sale to Man City being scuppered
|
|
By:
I think he might well stay, not worth selling him on the (very) cheap, he might play like a player reborn. Did you watch last night? Fulkrug looked good, lost a few pounds, wants the starting role, could start repaying us. Here's hoping!
|
|
By:
Can you imagine facing charges you know to be untrue and having to wait all this time to be "cleared"?
It is outrageous,swifty |
|
By:
It was ridiculous, and it's hardly throwing a match when it's middle of the pitch anyway, not true 'fixing' for a few fivers. They had the evidence (or not) months ago. He's not a bettor is Lucas Paqueta.
|
|
By:
I was not so certain about his Uncle,swifty
 |
|
By:
Happy birthday uncle!
What about Kitson?! FA would've tried to get him locked up if it happened today! |
|
By:
What I fail to understand is why a footballer on £100,000 per week would consider betting crooked for peanuts
|
|
By:
I thought the accusation was that his mates/family would have profited from betting on his bookings, not the player himself.
|
|
By:
You can castigate the FA and they look responsible for leaking misleading information to the press, but the initial instigator was Betway. They are the ones who's BS influenced the gullible and ill informed FA
|
|
By:
It's happened countless times on here that people are adamant in their conclusions that a market is bent with insiders, when it isn't.
|
|
By:
A churlish "Not Proven" from the appropriately named FA
|