Football
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
28 Jun 25
16:21
Joined:
Date Joined:
06 Jul 10
The Premier League PSR rules are about as fit for purpose as a chocolate teapot. Chelsea FC Holdings made a profit of £128m in 23/24 after selling the women’s team to itself. The parent company BlueCo 22 (which owns the men’s team, the women’s team and…Strasbourg) made a loss of £430m in the same period as cannot include intra group transactions in the group accounts. Richard Masters keeps a straight face and says Chelsea have not broken any rules…because the rules on these types of deals are full of loopholes.
If I was Everton or Forest would be livid.
Keiran mcguire
If I was Everton or Forest would be livid.
Keiran mcguire
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 5
|
By:
Since the Premier League allowed Abu Dhabi to buy City FFP has been effectively dead.
Chelsea's financial trickery is just them levelling up the playing field. |
|
By:
There was no FFP when Abu Dhabi bought city. The rules were first introduced 5 years later
|
|
By:
Aston Villa agree deal to sell women’s team to holding company V Sports & a stake to prominent US-based investors. #AVFC say no issues regarding Premier League PSR rules + advanced talks with UEFA on resolution to FFP compliance @TheAthleticFC
|
|
By:
Good that they have lost £430 million
Lets hope they lose another £430 million this year and still play rubbish football. |
|
By:
Aston Villa, Barcelona , Chelsea, AS Roma and Lyon are all fined by UEFA for breaching financial Fair Play regulations.
Chelsea: 20M€ Barcelona: 15M€ Lyon: 12.5M€ Aston Villa: 11M€ Roma: 3M€ |