Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
abba21
08 Jun 25 13:03
Joined:
Date Joined: 02 Apr 25
| Topic/replies: 3,076 | Blogger: abba21's blog
Everyone is sick of time wasting so stop the clock and end game on 90 like rugby.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 15
By:
The Dragon
When: 08 Jun 25 18:47
fair point
By:
sofaking
When: 08 Jun 25 19:24
...and ice hockey.
By:
swiftynifty
When: 08 Jun 25 21:10
you stop the clock , at what point do you restart it?
By:
sofaking
When: 08 Jun 25 22:03
when play resumes...
By:
swiftynifty
When: 08 Jun 25 22:51
how does that stop time wasting? and how does it shorten the game?
By:
s.kenbo
When: 09 Jun 25 05:18
It’d be a three hour game then.
By:
Aspro
When: 09 Jun 25 10:06
Stating the obvious, but it's only time-wasting when the ball is not in-play. Goal kicks, free kicks, throw-ins, corners, injuries etc. Goalkeepers can still use it when they collect a ball from (say) one of Werner's shots, but then just keep the 6-second rule for this scenario. It won't shorten the game unless they reduce the game to an hour, which is probably what it actually is anyway. I'm all for stopping the clock, but in saying that, I was originally in favour of VAR before I saw it in action. Not so keen today.
By:
DIE LINKE
When: 09 Jun 25 13:04
reckon these 02 April 2025 bunch are AI bots to stimulate forum traffic by engaging the 20-odd remaining forumites in hot-button discussions.
By:
invicta
When: 09 Jun 25 17:32
Stop these stupid goal celebrations that will save time, the one where you run 30 yards to knee slide and then wait until all your teammates and the subs come and jump all over you - the one where a scorerer puts the ball up his shirt and runs around sucking his thumb, think that means he as tubbed somebody, maybe his wife, conceding teams should be allowed to KO within 30 secs of conceding a goal.
To compensate the scorers they can stay on the pitch at the end of the game and do their celebrations.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 09 Jun 25 17:34
Got to wait 5 minutes for var before players can celebrate these daze.
By:
Big Cat
When: 09 Jun 25 17:39
It would be a 60 minute game. It would stop time wasting because time wasting would be a waste of time
I'm against it though. I'm a referee and I'm sick of Americanisms influencing our game
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 09 Jun 25 17:44
Some teams delay the game on purpose because of
high energy pressing, and they want a break.

Goalie goes down, as he doesn't leave the field.

Some players are very slow to get up too.
By:
lurka
When: 09 Jun 25 20:18
Goal celebrations don't delay it more than the VAR check after every goal, generally.

Time wasting is as much about killing opposition momentum and giving your defenders a break if the opposition are on top of them late on and you are trying to see the game out. The rule changes seem to be made by nerd refs who have never played the game and don't understand this.

They add on an extra 5-10 mins a game now, then they allow one team to waste half of it and don't add it back on. It doesn't stop time wasting, it just adds 10 mins to the length of most matches with at least as much time-wasting if not more.

They need rules like giving a team a corner if a goal kick isn't taken quickly etc. Understand the motivations to time waste and remove them via effective sanctions. The game is supposed to flow freely with a consequent endurance fitness element to it in the latter stages. Giving players 5 extra breathers a half scuppers this.
By:
Crisp77
When: 09 Jun 25 20:26
Zero points for a draw
By:
LoyalHoncho
When: 09 Jun 25 21:39
Well said cat.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com