|
By:
Are you sure it's a bug and not just a rip off?
|
|
By:
I thought the same.
Wasn’t 100% sure what he meant though. Is he saying, for example a £10 stake, that after three winning legs he was being offered £6.40 and £7.60 or those percentages shy of his maximum win? If the former then it’s an error of sorts (maybe no information on one of the legs), if it’s the latter then I’m not surprised at all. |
|
By:
no bug, its a rip-off plain and simple.
|
|
By:
Had three lays on the correct scores when it was 1-1. 0-0 -£1857, 0-1 -£2637 1-0 -£7,967, +£12.40 on the rest. Plenty of money to back at 1000. Showed a cashout value of -£2159!
|
|
By:
these days even if you cashing out usually when one goal can scupper you , beyond 80/85 mins,their could be up to 8,9,10 mins injury time minimum 4 or 5 in 90% of games, the reason punters use cash out is because of the number of times a bet has gone down in last 10 mins + injury time, keep a record on how many times your bets go down after 80 mins
|
|
By:
to clarify my example, manual cashout +£0.00, bf cashout -£2159.
![]() |
|
By:
It should have been offering 60+ to Cashout but instead it was offering 3.60. has to be a bug. Yeah it's a rip off and would be cheaper to lay manually on the exchange but that's got to be an error.
All 3 other games were FT and should have been settled |
|
By:
bf want people to use cashout, for obvious reasons, strongly advise against it.
|
|
By:
Exactly, they want you to Cashout so you can gamble it away again
|