Football
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Gladbach score, bets matched, VAR intervenes, goal disallowed, some bets cancelled some still stand.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 12
|
By:
Massive fck up when you look at the hump on the match odds graph
|
|
By:
"This must not be allowed to ever happen again" until it does ,and then someone will say"This must not be allowed to ever happen again "until it does,and then someone will say..................................
 |
|
By:
All bets will be voided as per their rules. Just need to speak to them and they will readjust accordingly
|
|
By:
What they should do, and always have done, is say all bets stand, then you know where you are at at all times and bet at your own risk (no different to money on cricket when there are appeals etc)
|
|
By:
The thing about these ballsups is that bf do not correct them unless you contact them about it and even then they will only correctly settle your bet. There was tens of thousands matched on Leverkusen @ 1.3 last night, these bets placed between the goal suspension and the VAR decision suspension should have been cancelled but weren't. That's 1.3 on a 1.1 shot.
|
|
By:
No bets voided by bf. Certainly not spending half an hour on livechat getting them to resettle a winning bet into a loser.
It's actually possible to turn a £10 bet into a £8000 loss if you get caught up in a bf VAR f**k up. |
|
By:
Incorrectly voided bet involving VAR on Friday, some amount of rigmarole to get it resettled the next day. They only get corrected when you challenge them and the amount of bets that go unchallenged shows that people either aren't checking their in-play bets or I'm betting against bots.
|
|
By:
I've continually argued with them not to open markets after a goal until game has kicked off again in case of VAR. There standard response is customers want to be able to bet a.s.a.p., absolute farce tried to explain that customers want to bet knowing that bet will stand not pot luck if it will or not,
|
|
By:
Clearly they should not open markets until the game kicks off again as they are incapable of correctly voiding bets when VAR is involved. It's not even as if it involves minor leagues, they even did it in Euro 2024.
|
|
By:
How about this scenario (in my experience around 1 in 50 markets involving VAR contain wrongly settled bets):
Man City v Liverpool Liverpool score to make it 1-0, the market is unsuspended and someone puts up £10 @ 1000 on 0-0 and you take it, VAR intervenes and the goal is disallowed, after the second suspend bt haven't voided your bet. Happy days! You lay 0-0 for a grand @ 9.0 and green up for just under £1,000. It ends 0-0, but the layer of your tenner @1000 has contacted bf to tell them it should have been voided. They agree so you are left £8,991.00 in the red. |
|
By:
Another balls up. A lay was wrongly settled as a back, so -£100. Money taken from balance. It was later resettled correctly as a lay, so +£100. But of course -£100 plus +£100 = £0.
|
|
By:
VAR Beyond a fckn joke now
 Sick of this sh1t |