Football
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Had a small bet on each keeper to make 1+ save in each half in Austria Turkey game. 1st half, a shot come cross from Arnautavic was gathered by the keeper. If he hadn't then it would have gone in. Stats show no shots on target.
Is this not a 'save' ?
Is this not a 'save' ?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 20
|
By:
These stats based bets are riddled with these inconsistencies
Bookies have kids on string with build a bet... If that's not a save then ask for a refund. |
|
By:
Just seems a bit subjective. Hypothetically, Keeper get angles wrong and pushes it away when camera angle shows it going wide anyway. Save?
|
|
By:
Post a link to the clip so I can judge it properly
|
|
By:
Wouldn't even know where to start! Was about halfway thru 1st half from memory
|
|
By:
A gathering of the ball doesn't sound like a save to me unless the ball was going directly in if he hadn't of gathered it. Not that this helps, but I wouldn't bet on this type of cack tbh. Kind Regards.
|
|
By:
It would have gone in had he not gathered it but I guess the cross come shot means it was not intentional. Tho they do go in or need saving imo but c'est la vie
|
|
By:
"Never bet on anything where the result is open to interpretation because the interpretation will always go against you!" From The Sayings of Dr Slicer, available at all not very good bookshops nowhere in the country.
|
|
By:
Thank u o wise slicer!....it was a very small bet!
|
|
By:
Glad you didn't get hurt.
|
|
By:
Flashscores stats show GK saves, 1 & 4,(90 mins).
|
|
By:
Sadly, an adjudication of this type of bets by bookies is opened to interpretation (as verified by IBAS), and can differ greatly between bookies eg to me a "save" would mean had the keeper not prevented it from crossing the goal line a goal would have been scored. Of course, bookies might not see it that way eg a shot heading into goal (on target) and the keeper picking it up without too much bother.
As we're on this subject did England have more shots on target against Slovenia? I know the match finished 0-0. |
|
By:
3-1 England i123
|
|
By:
Sure I read England's only 2 shots on target were the goals. Shocking but true
|
|
By:
According to Flashscore it's 3-1... That's Slovenia
Slovakia was 2 on target |
|
By:
'Aspro', thank-you. The reason I asked was 365 had England more shots on target boosted from 1/3 to 'evens'. But, I cannot remember whether it was for the 1st half or full game.
I hope Mr Southgate has a helmet ready on Friday in case England play pants, and exits the tournament due to his glaringly lack of tactical nous, his exaggerated decision/timing with subs and obsessive loyalty to non-performing senior players. |
|
By:
For the record, assuming you're referring to Slovenia, it was 2-1 FH and 1-0 SH
|
|
By:
Stick to corners, goals cards etc ...'
|
|
By:
Yeah as said very subjective market. Belguim France, De Bruyne whipped in a free kick which was a cross shot, the keeper bizarrely kicked it away off his own line, didn't count as a shot but apparently counted as a save.
For the record betfair use whoscored.com for settling on these bets. |
|
By:
so a direct from a corner goal would not count as a shot? Ridiculous.
|
|
By:
Why do bookies not use the same outfit as adjudicators for these special bets? This will mean a set of rules for everyone regardless of who punters bet with.
|