|
By:
Not sure why West Ham would be odds on in an empty stadium to a team they lost 3-0 to earlier this season. It looks like a knee jerk reaction to beating Chelsea - the value is a lay bet of West Ham at that price
|
|
By:
West ham 4 points off the drop with much higher motivation levels than Burnley imo who are safe, of course it doesn't always work out like that but would find it hard to go against Wham.
|
|
By:
I would and have
|
|
By:
Wait until the first drinks break. If it is still 0-0 then back West Ham. Will be a better price. The most likely result but odds on is too short. It was 6/5 when the markets opened and that is more like it.
|
|
By:
thanks for letting me know wolf
![]() |
|
By:
Hard to back a side that starts with a full back up front, but what the hell
|
|
By:
wolf knew.
|
|
By:
Tried to give David Mug the benefit of the doubt, starting with Antonio as a lone striker, but I guess some guy on the Betfair forum does know more than a Scottish Clown getting paid millions of pounds to be a football manager
|
|
By:
I honestly think they do it on purpose JC
It beggers belief how these utter t*ats get given cushy contracts to "manage" premier league clubs, gotta be a boys only club for sure |
|
By:
Bad result for the Ammers. Right back in the relegation mix eh.
|
|
By:
useless tonight had them win or draw in a double with the blades, cant complain the football results have been since the restart
|
|
By:
Backable. Looked to have turned the corner with a win over Chelsea and draw at Newcastle.
Burnley have Chris Wood back, though I don't know if he'll start. Regardless, I feel this match is more about West Ham's momentum. Will wait to see the teams. 1.95 at home, and still wrong! Almost 10years on here and still CLUELESS!!! |
|
By:
MUG1326 "Will wait to see teams"
TOP ANALYSIS AS ALWAYS! ! ! ! |
|
By:
|
|
By:
|