Jan 22, 2019 -- 6:59PM, robbo007 wrote:
Anyone any thoughts on why not found as yet? Not the biggest expanse of water, would a light aircraft break up and effectively sink on impact thus making it difficult?
The prospects of a successful ditching (assuming it wasn't inadvertently flown into the sea) at night are extremely low. Chances of a break up and sink scenario are highly likely.
Jan 22, 2019 -- 9:59PM, leazes67 wrote:
Reports say take off attempted 2/3 times.
Even if that is true, it's almost certainly a red herring.
What we don't know at the moment is whether the aeroplane was scheduled to stop in Guernsey on the way back, as it had travelling in the opposite direction on Saturday. If it wasn't, why was it flying so low? (other aeroplanes reported ice accumulation on the wings at similar altitudes in the area on the day of the accident, yet it was a pressurised aeroplane and capable of flying above the clouds and out of icing conditions). The pilot requested to descend from 5000' to 2300' for some reason prior to the accident.... (possibly to get out of the ice-forming clouds)
Jan 23, 2019 -- 4:20PM, darren_discombobulates_sports wrote:
apparently the plane he was travelling in was 35 years old, think anything over 15 years in aviation is considered old, 35 years is living well into borrowed time.
That really depends how well it's maintained.
It's all very well dumping people with parachutes out the side door of an aeroplane at an airfield you know like the back of your hand, and quite different flying a single-engine prop, over the sea, at night and in the face of icing conditions. Whoever put pilot and passenger together bears a significant brunt of the liability here, it seems.
Jan 23, 2019 -- 5:53PM, howard wrote:
If you get decent wages sometimes the best bet is
Jan 23, 2019 -- 9:10PM, kenny mann wrote:
All very sad.What happens to th 15m? Do Cardiff get compensated by the Ins Company assuming they're covered?
yes, but only if he was insured
you normally cant insure a player purchased on the weekend until Monday morning which is why most deals if not confirmed Friday night are confirmed Monday morning
Cardiff announced his signing on a Saturday night, but for all we know the insurance could have been in place on the Friday or they put it through Monday morning.
Feb 6, 2019 -- 7:34PM, donny osmond wrote:
probably equally disgusting cardiff havnt paid , saying they are checking the paperwork.doesnt do the lad , the pilot, and their families any good whatsoever
Agreed.
Dock 6 points off the feckers.
Feb 9, 2019 -- 8:27AM, The Dragon wrote:
very very sad why was he on a rickety plane like that?
From what I've read elsewhere, there are likely to be an awful lot of questions about the legality of the flight at all, let alone what it was in....
Mar 30, 2019 -- 2:49PM, Ibrahima Sonko wrote:
Beginning to show agents only care about one thing.
100%, IS!
Mar 30, 2019 -- 11:04PM, blackbarn wrote:
"Isnt there a story that Cardiff are refusing to pay Nantes as they say the transfer was not legally binding, also the pilot in the crash was apparently colour blind. you couldn't make it up!!!"1. this will be a matter of contractual detail and interpretation, and could run and run. 2. being colour-blind does not prevent you from being a pilot. You just can't fly at night.
Everybody is just out to ensure that they were not holding the parcel when the music stopped as it has to be highly debatable as to whether there will be an insurance payout forthcoming given just how messy this whole sorry affair is. The pilot clearly wasn't legal to fly as it did, the aeroplane wasn't legal to be flown as it was, and it is probably fairly safe to assume that there was to be some 'payment in kind' for the flight (given the pilot had just been issued with yet another CCJ), again something which he was not legal for.