Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
OJlovedNICOLE
28 Feb 16 18:17
Joined:
Date Joined: 18 Nov 10
| Topic/replies: 285 | Blogger: OJlovedNICOLE's blog
is he even worth 400K? Absolutely terrible excuse for a footballer.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 59
By:
Roger De Bris
When: 28 Feb 16 21:57
A master at diving and trimming beards.
By:
thelatarps
When: 28 Feb 16 22:28
If he was bad
how about sturridge?
goddamn every time that boy touched the ball he might as well have been wearing a light blue jersey
By:
hitman76
When: 28 Feb 16 23:06
Sturridge is a typical modern day footballer.Seems to be on a permanent sulky mood. Can't see him being there after the summer which will suit all parties imo.
By:
DirkDiggler
When: 29 Feb 16 00:09
Remove L. Suarez and see what happens.
By:
themover
When: 29 Feb 16 00:40
21 yrs old, 157 Premier League and Cup appearances, 20 appearances for England, 1st winners medal today...I'd say he's not doing too bad.
By:
jed.davison
When: 29 Feb 16 02:48
Total muggery slating Sterling. You can't have watched City in Kiev - the boy is a class act. He is a boy - he is not the player or even one of the players letting that team down.
By:
TheBetfairBuddy
When: 29 Feb 16 02:51

Feb 29, 2016 -- 12:40AM, themover wrote:


21 yrs old, 157 Premier League and Cup appearances, 20 appearances for England, 1st winners medal today...I'd say he's not doing too bad.


20 appearances for England, and they are sh^te

By:
jed.davison
When: 29 Feb 16 03:13
They have been shyte - FACTS Laugh

We will go there with several of the best young footballers in Europe. Kane, Tom Carroll, Delle Alli, Eric Dier, Walker, Rose. Some people rate Barkley he should go - he doesn't start though, he's not really fit to lace Tom Carroll's boots, and that John Stones, but let's be honest Eric Dier plays in midfield and he'd make Stones look like George Berry if he had to fill in one week at centre-back.

I don't think Hodgson will be bold enough to pick Cameron Carter-Vickers, not as first choice anyway. That will be just another footnote in history's indictment of him.

Obviously the key to it is the best young central midfielder in England, if not the world: Ryan Mason. I expect him to own that armband, like Gerrard. And Charlton.
By:
OnePercenter
When: 29 Feb 16 12:39
Sterling pace is best suited to counter attacking but his finishing is gash at best.

Even in these days of silly money £49m for someone who can run fast but can't hit a barn door from 6 yards is laughable. Steeling a living, City's Theo Walcott.
By:
1st time poster
When: 29 Feb 16 13:55
seems finaly the likes of wright ,shearer,journo,s have cottoned on to what people such as myself have been saying day in day out for 5 yrs that wallycott has never been and will never be a decent elp player,i,m only amazed they thought he was playing down the middle yesterday,certainly in the 1st half he was stood out on the right wing for the whole 45 mins doing his finger nails,they,ll be along in 18 months time telling us the same about oxo ,all thought we,ve been saying it for 3 years now
By:
DirkDiggler
When: 29 Feb 16 15:00
All the pundits follow the same line on every subject - virtually, there must be 98% consensus on everything said. None of them can think for themselves, or dares to. Which is why the fans are 5 years ahead on Walcott. The pundits and all those within the game are in a cosy little club where they all make a fortune out of the general public.

We should not be surprised, it is a business and an industry after all.

Keep spouting the same things over and over again, keep your nose clean, laugh all the way to the bank.

The Walcott thing is typical, the line taken on him within the game is that he's good player yet to blossom or who just lacks consistency has palpably been nonsense for years. He's no good, he never has been, a few flashes early on doth not make a career.

You can predict everything said before the broadcast starts.
By:
geordie1956
When: 29 Feb 16 15:26
Walcott was promising as a 16 / 17 year old because he had a lot of pace which at that age can give an advantage, however, he has not mentally been able to progress and as such has been unable to evolve and develop as a footballer - sadly his best years have probably gone & he is yet another footballer who has taken advantage of all the money awash in the game currently - his good fortune that he came into the game with Sky around but probably another example where you don't have to work hard enough to achieve something more for yourself and your team
By:
YOMOMMA
When: 29 Feb 16 15:28
He's good for an English player. English footballers are on the whole a complete bunch of losers who bottle penalty shoot outs time and time again.
By:
OnePercenter
When: 29 Feb 16 15:34
Walcott is one of these players who has had everything on a silver plate since he was mid teans. Where is the hunger to do better? Where is that extra few % effort needed to stick the ball in the back of the net?
By:
Injera
When: 29 Feb 16 15:58
Walcott has been dogged by injuries.

Just over 200 appearances in 9 years Shocked I wonder how many times he's been subbed?? Seems to happen even when he plays well.

In that time he's scored 54 goals, mainly from a wide position. That's very impressive, especially when you consider Arsenal dominate position anfd therefore teams drop deeper, negating his pace.
By:
duncan idaho
When: 29 Feb 16 16:02
some serious trolling from jed here  Happy
By:
Injera
When: 29 Feb 16 16:17
*dominate possession
By:
OJlovedNICOLE
When: 29 Feb 16 17:09
To summarise: he can't dribble (just loses control of the ball when he moves and trips over it); he can't pass (other than arguably a bobbling 2-yarder); he is weak on the ball (despite super-scouser Stevie G claiming otherwise) and his finishing is undoubtedly the worst from any player in the EPL. Can you remember Raheem scoring a good goal or doing something special or even half-decent? NO! That's because he's not capable... put him in a League One side and see how he does. Absolute and utter fraud. If you tend to disagree strongly then OK that's your prerogative and everyone is entitled to their own opinion but I shall tell you this for free... you're a huge mug!
By:
houseofpain
When: 29 Feb 16 17:17
sunday league beckons when he looses a yard of pace, absolute garbage.
By:
themover
When: 29 Feb 16 17:26
Crazy
By:
3 valleys
When: 29 Feb 16 17:28
remember in his very early days at Anfield chance to win game vs Everton and his shot hit the corner flag. Spurs were sniffing around and I thought might be good time to sell before he gets found out then Suarez makes him look much much better than he is - the sale was very good business - i don't expect him to get any better but if anyone can get him to improve it'll be Pep
By:
1st time poster
When: 29 Feb 16 17:29
as much as i dont rate stirling as a top epl player the one thing i would give him over wally and oxo, is that he at least looks as though he wants to play and gives it a go,just hasnt got the tools needed in the box i,m afraid
By:
DirkDiggler
When: 29 Feb 16 17:33
I said Liverpool should take the money and run away laughing, I stand by that, and it's been borne out so far. Pep might sort him out though.
By:
themover
When: 29 Feb 16 18:09
How has it been borne out? Sterling has a winners medal and Liverpool are further away from a league title than they were when he played for them Confused City are better with Sterling and Liverpool aren't imho
By:
1st time poster
When: 29 Feb 16 18:20
not saying your right or wrong but if arsenal fall over the line in epl does that mean we are all wrong about wally and oxo,reminds me of when le boueff was playing shoite week in,week out and his only response was i,m a world cup winner,dealp at boro lec full back has enough games in to be an epl medal winner if lec win the lg,doesnt make him a top epl player,currently playing in the championship,you,d be a brave man to say stirling has improved city as a side which you,d expect after spending 50 million
By:
themover
When: 29 Feb 16 18:28
Well we used to have Milner on the left hand-side, so basically a swop of Milner for Sterling with Liverpool. Which do you think is better? Not knocking Milner because he always puts in a shift but Sterling provides pace on the left which we didn't have before.
By:
DirkDiggler
When: 29 Feb 16 18:31
How has it been borne out? Sterling has a winners medal and Liverpool are further away from a league title than they were when he played for them Confused City are better with Sterling and Liverpool aren't imho


He's done nothing. What do Liverpool have to do with it?

A swap for Milner? lol I think you're forgetting something.
By:
1st time poster
When: 29 Feb 16 18:32
that pace on the left currently has you 9 pts behind barca,i mean leciester
By:
themover
When: 29 Feb 16 18:39
I assume you are referring to the £50 million Dirk Tongue Out I doubt Milner will last 10 years so £5m a year for Sterling is reasonable

The season isn't over yet, and I wouldn't write City off for the league just yet. They are also about to go into the quarter-final of the Champions League for the first time ever (barring a disaster) and that's with Sterling in the team.
By:
sickoflayinwinners
When: 29 Feb 16 18:48
themover, please don't jonj in with this "puts in a shift" cliche thats becoming  almost as daft as (he gave him the eyes" and other football bsah7t talk.a shift? a fun  hour and a hour running about on a football pitch  pleeeeeeeeeeweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease, i ask you
By:
themover
When: 29 Feb 16 18:49
fair enough...Milner did a lot of running every match. Will that do? Laugh
By:
sickoflayinwinners
When: 29 Feb 16 18:50
yes perfectly acceptableWink
By:
themover
When: 29 Feb 16 18:51
Cool
By:
The Shiekh
When: 29 Feb 16 18:53
Sterling is useless
By:
sickoflayinwinners
When: 29 Feb 16 19:02
useless?of course not, he's an england international so he must have some kind of ability, overrated probably, has he progressed at city/almost undoubtedly not, has he's regressed at city/ almost undoubtedly yes.
By:
YOMOMMA
When: 29 Feb 16 19:15
sterling is useless and has a rubbish haircut and beard but english teams have to have a quota of english players. so if milner is worth £8m, sterling is well worth the £49m paid.
By:
YOMOMMA
When: 29 Feb 16 19:19
delph not milner. milner is rubbish as well.
By:
mesmerised
When: 29 Feb 16 19:24
Never in a month of Sunday's is he worth 50 mil, not even in today's inflated market. I would be surprised if Guardiola doesn't replace him fairly quickly.
By:
themover
When: 29 Feb 16 19:27
coming from someone who describes Jack Wilshere as world class Laugh
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com