Feb 3, 2016 -- 3:17PM, bbc2 wrote:
i prefer watford never back away sides at odds on
Would agree with you there about backing away's, but Chelsea are a solid team and starting to get back into the groove. a good level up from Watford
Feb 3, 2016 -- 7:18PM, BARNEY15C wrote:
chelsea / celtic double for me
my same double also
Feb 3, 2016 -- 8:14PM, ffaith wrote:
Kane and Ighalo are good strikers but boy are they fckin greedy.
Don't think I'd call Kane greedy.
Feb 3, 2016 -- 9:00PM, kellydamo wrote:
wow
That's my cue to lay Chelsea.
Feb 3, 2016 -- 8:59PM, kellydamo wrote:
Backed Cheslea can see them winning this 0-2 now
That's my cue to lay Chelsea.
Feb 3, 2016 -- 9:29PM, kellydamo wrote:
sofaking • February 3, 2016 9:09 PM GMTDamien, did you really back Sanchez unquoted yesterday?
Can't really see your reasoning behind that.
Feb 3, 2016 -- 9:34PM, sofaking wrote:
Feb 3, 2016 -- 9:29PM, kellydamo wrote:sofaking • February 3, 2016 9:09 PM GMTDamien, did you really back Sanchez unquoted yesterday?Can't really see your reasoning behind that.
Home game and the fact he was coming back from injury, always got goals i him and always taking shots
Feb 3, 2016 -- 9:40PM, minka wrote:
One way to stop these BOREFESTS would be for the clubs to give a FULL refund to the punters PLUS.....Every player to donate a weeks wages to charity
And zero points for a 0-0 draw.
Feb 3, 2016 -- 9:49PM, BARNEY15C wrote:
maybe chelsea should look at Barca on how to demolish teams - tonights performance was f ucking criminal
Chelsea don't the players for that obviously.