
Mar 30, 2015 -- 11:13PM, themightymac wrote:
Darlo. any lay of the 0-0 score HT or FT is a winning bet. The result has been determined
T&Cs doesn't say "result" determined, it says "market". The difference, I think unfortunately here, is crucial.
Mar 30, 2015 -- 11:15PM, themightymac wrote:
I give up, where`s that Malt and a straw. Yeah, they could chop the Aldosivi goal off 30 mins after it was scored and make it 0-0 scoreline.
Don't get me wrong, I totally understand what you're saying, but that's not how the market works. When there's a goal in one of the other matches tonight, just look at the correct score market and you can still back 0-0. And that's the key here, it's the market not the result.
Mar 30, 2015 -- 11:21PM, ohtartarsauce wrote:
??? But you can't lay 0-0 after a goal is scored - the market is dead!
Yes you actually can. You can see the market here with £5 laying 0-0 at 1000s, with £1 matched at that price.
Mar 30, 2015 -- 11:30PM, rocknmoll wrote:
Look at the Rubio Nu game, you can still back 0-0 at 1000 even though it's 0-0. The market isn't settled.
Exactly. It comes down to whether Betfair interpret "unconditionally determined" as settled, or as no longer possible. I wish you luck, somemuppet, but I don't think you'll get any in this situation.
Mar 30, 2015 -- 11:31PM, Westender wrote:
Sorry mac - I have layed 0-0 and seen a few SA riots.Betfair always void the CS market.Always do the over 0.5 marker now for SA matches
And that's why I'm trying to help. For the few occasions that matches might be abandoned, and fighting in SA isn't entirely rare, o0.5 market is safer than the correct score market.
Mar 30, 2015 -- 11:38PM, rocknmoll wrote:
Now here's an interesting one. Total goals. If you backed 1 or more instead of Over 0.5, do you get paid? As that one usually only settled at FT too right, not every goal?
That's actually an even better point than you possibly realise. Because surely now that the cross-market cross-matcher is in operation, that would include between the "total goals" and "overs" markets, which mean one part of the bet could be void, and the other part of the same bet be already settled.
Mar 30, 2015 -- 11:56PM, Westender wrote:
No point TSOA packet of bacon won then ripped out the hands before you stick a rasher on the George Foreman
You had a bet ont he game just abandoned Westennder?
Nothing worse than smelling the Bacon in the george foreman grill and than having it snayched out the grill before yoru eyes
Mar 31, 2015 -- 12:08AM, themightymac wrote:
I can see what you lot are saying but if that`s correct then that is criminal. If this has happened to you guys before then seriously I would not bet with them again. It`s nothing more than robbery and the person who came up with the Rule must have been on acid at the time or knows f*** all about betting.
but thats the terms and conditions rule you agree to when you join and bet
If you ticked that box which you have to when you join then you agree to the 3 day rule
Mar 31, 2015 -- 12:17AM, Darlo Bantam wrote:
This is nothing to do with a three day rule TSO. It's the fact that an impossible result is not determined until 90 minutes whereas essentially identical markets are already settled when impossible. There is no theoretical difference between laying 0-0 and backing Over 0.5 goals, but Betfair's T&Cs mean one is a winner and the other void when the match is abandoned at 1-0.
Yes i agree, it should be 1 rule for all, but dont forget BF is a business where commission for them is KING
Mar 31, 2015 -- 12:19AM, DirkDiggler wrote:
rocknmoll - I don`t know about BF t&c`s but I know one thing, if anybody that layed 0-0 HT or FT doesn`t get paid, That's not right, if there's been a goal then that's that irrespective of any abandonment.
Only bet that would be paid out would be over 0.5 here
Cant see anything else being paid out, No HT markets would be paid out since match up to HT wasnt completed, so laying 0-0HT or laying the draw HT, would all be subject tot the 3-day rule
YOU MUST HAVE TOO. i'm ok with that.

If this is really happening regularly BF punters need to start a petition and eradicate this fraudulent act. I`m sure that fair minded backers and layers alike and everyone with the slightest knowledge of gambling would agree that this should not be happening. If Bookmakers acted in a similar manner, which thankfully they don`t, they would have their license withdrawn.