|
By:
Didn't bet on that but shouldn't have been voided. Although 90mins weren't played (they randomly added on 6+ mins) so who knows whats in their small print
|
|
By:
who was bet with ?
|
|
By:
'another bookmaker' - what flummery is this. such circumlocution is rarely unpremeditated. Why so coy?
|
|
By:
The match was "completed" but not the full 90 mins + stoppage time was played
All depends on what the books terms and conditions say about such events |
|
By:
was with 188bet, they are saying the game is void due to the match not being completed, this dont sound right to me in this instance,
|
|
By:
The Ghana win must have been the worst result in their book but the match was completed.
Bet they don't void the Tunisia match recently where none of the 2 mins IT was played and the ref blew 30 secs early as well. |
|
By:
The full 90 min WAS played.
The referee is the time keeper and he did not freeze the clock. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Think what Stringer means is, full time is entirely at the discrection of the referee. So if 90 mins is actually played or not is irrelavant - its upto the ref to time it so he can call ft whenever.
|
|
By:
Scummy decision to void that. The full match was played.
|