Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
kellydamo
18 Jan 15 23:12
Joined:
Date Joined: 27 Nov 10
| Topic/replies: 16,087 | Blogger: kellydamo's blog
1.01    £5,309        £101,212
1.02    £361        £173,829
1.03    £438        £77,527
1.04    £608        £50,919
1.05    £148        £83,185
1.06    £120        £87,940
1.07            £126,912
1.08            £203,310
1.09    £18        £84,994
1.1            £37,660
1.11    £40        £11,229
1.12    £25        £77,184
1.13    £6,859        £30,363
1.14            £3,418
1.15            £14,637
1.16            £18,914
1.17            £170,793
1.18            £185,589
1.19            £24,932
1.2            £82,825
1.21            £93,077
1.22            £32,184
1.23            £29,793
1.24            £43,838
1.25            £177,927
1.26            £18,218
1.27            £30,446
1.28            £29,461
1.29            £26,748
1.3            £125,769
1.31            £237,431
1.32            £29,188
1.33            £13,253
1.34            £9,622
1.35            £18,692
1.36            £20,746
1.37            £3,668
1.38            £21,906
1.39            £5,291
1.40    £40        £50,699
1.41            £65,076
1.42            £20,831
1.43            £56,617
1.44            £99,446
1.45            £75,452
1.46            £93,746
1.47            £74,698
1.48            £46,106
1.49            £10,844
1.5            £43,062
1.51            £17,396
1.52    £75        £17,111
1.53    £18        £14,232
1.54            £9,627
1.55            £21,409
1.56            £7,542
1.57            £11,618
1.58    £8        £14,766
1.59            £5,418
1.6            £37,089
1.61            £18,752
1.62            £6,599
1.63            £8,698
1.64            £15,032
1.65            £10,045
1.66            £8,436
1.67            £4,883
1.68    £43        £5,192
1.69            £2,729
1.7            £32,455
1.71            £16,240
1.72            £2,920
1.73            £7,413
1.74            £23,053
1.75            £8,827
1.76            £11,027
1.77            £59,946
1.78    £0        £49,820
1.79            £42,378
1.8            £43,223
1.81            £2,268
Pause Switch to Standard View Mahooosive Gubbage in NFL
Show More
Loading...
Report kellydamo January 18, 2015 11:14 PM GMT
Looks liek I was a bit premature ha
Report kellydamo January 18, 2015 11:30 PM GMT
They think it is all over, it is now, absolute gubbage
Report scaredmoney January 18, 2015 11:31 PM GMT
ya get any of it kell?
Report dr . atkins January 18, 2015 11:36 PM GMT
crowd going wild still don't know our seattle won
Report TexassportsagentBuzz January 18, 2015 11:37 PM GMT
That final catch was some play.
Report TexassportsagentBuzz January 18, 2015 11:38 PM GMT
Wilson crying like a baby was hard to watch though. You won you fool stop crying.
Report dr . atkins January 18, 2015 11:40 PM GMT
thats why sport is so great when things like this happen worth having sky sports just for that match tonight
Report kellydamo January 18, 2015 11:45 PM GMT

Jan 18, 2015 -- 11:31PM, scaredmoney wrote:


ya get any of it kell?


a speculative tenner at 8.4 haha, never looked like it was going to happen like all gubbages

Report tobermory January 19, 2015 12:33 AM GMT
whay was the team 1.01 and how did they lose ?
Report mafeking January 19, 2015 1:04 AM GMT
green bay led 19-7. seattle scored with about 2.10 left, recovered onside kick and scored again with a 2 point conversation to lead 22-19

green bay got a field to force overtime and seattle won it with a touchdown on the first possession in OT
Report tobermory January 19, 2015 1:24 AM GMT
thanks .

was it that unlikely they would get pssession again after scoring the 1st one ? 1.01 seems a bit of a blunder
Report mafeking January 19, 2015 1:34 AM GMT
would think you'd recover the onside kick about 1 in 4 or 5 times. probably around 1.1 green bay then

trying to think the worst position they were in. wilson got intercepted so green bay had the ball with just under 5 mins left went 3 and out and then seattle scored twice in 44 seconds
Report Tucho January 19, 2015 5:58 AM GMT
was it that unlikely they would get pssession again after scoring the 1st one ? 1.01 seems a bit of a blunder

1.01 was a bit earlier

green bay intercepted wilson for the 4th time with about 5 minutes left, up 19-7, and the game really did look dead and buried, fans leaving

the defender didn't even bother trying to advance the ball with his interception return, he just slid down, as if the game was over, there was nobody around him
Report RAPS January 19, 2015 9:23 AM GMT
recovery from onside kick is closer to 1 in 3
Report kellydamo January 19, 2015 10:07 AM GMT

Jan 19, 2015 -- 9:23AM, RAPS wrote:


recovery from onside kick is closer to 1 in 3


Disagree, it would be 1 in 5.  Where do you get 1 in 3 from?

Report Magic__Daps January 19, 2015 10:38 AM GMT
Defo closer to 1 in 4
Report Nayim January 19, 2015 1:40 PM GMT
A study a few years back put it at 26%. If you separate it into expected onside kick (i.e. the opposition knows its coming) and surprise onside kick its 20% and 60% respectively.
Report Fallen Angel January 19, 2015 1:46 PM GMT
yeah to be fair the 1.01 compared to the point in the game wasn't completely inaccurate. Seattle still needed two touchdowns with only 5 minutes off the clock and Green Bay in possession at the GB 40 yard line. This almost guaranteed the closest that Seattle would be on their next possession was the SS 20 yard line with two touchdowns required and maybe 3.20 on the clock. The requirements were then a 80 yard touchdown drive, an an onside kick recovery followed by another touchdown within three minutes.
Report wisewords January 19, 2015 2:39 PM GMT
even the 2 point conversion after the last touchdown in normal time was lucky!
Report kellydamo January 19, 2015 3:04 PM GMT

Jan 19, 2015 -- 1:40PM, Nayim wrote:


A study a few years back put it at 26%. If you separate it into expected onside kick (i.e. the opposition knows its coming) and surprise onside kick its 20% and 60% respectively.


That is too small a sample to go by.  This year alone the percentage is 36% but you cannot go off of one season to call it, you need a bigger sample size.  The stats from 2000-12 put it at 19.7% That is a far truer sample size

Report Crisp77 January 19, 2015 3:09 PM GMT
I would expect with it being such a big game both teams would have been practising it all week.
Report TexassportsagentBuzz January 19, 2015 3:52 PM GMT
Im sure they did practise onside kicks and OK recoverys but with the ovlong shaped ball its nearly impossible to tell which way it will bounce.
Report mafeking January 19, 2015 4:37 PM GMT
yep it's difficult when you gotta get it to go 10 yards and give your players a chance to recover it. always like pure luck generally with as happened last night a player on the defense making a mess of catching it before allowing the offensive players to recover the rebound
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com