Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Mcik
09 Jan 15 18:51
Joined:
Date Joined: 27 Jul 10
| Topic/replies: 1,204 | Blogger: Mcik's blog
From what I can gather Standard have been awarded 3 penalties and the other team have walked off. Devil

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 22
By:
olderthebetter
When: 09 Jan 15 18:54
Was just going to ask this question. Not good when you'd gone in on 1.5 and 2.5 when Standard took then lead. Been paid out on the 1.5, what do you reckon with 2.5 void? Or will the bet stand?
By:
Darren09
When: 09 Jan 15 18:54
Seem's so, i had over 2.5 goals, so what will happen there then, Bills had it down as a loser!!
By:
p-hostyle
When: 09 Jan 15 19:01
I found a stream and started looking from the 80th minute. Heerenveen seemed very upset when the second penalty was awarded to Standard...there was no replay when the referee decided to give another penalty so I couldn't say if the ref had made the right decision...
By:
olderthebetter
When: 09 Jan 15 19:05
So the whole team walked off when he gave the third with 5 mins to go? What happened did ref call ft straight away? Not got much running on bet tbh, just would like to know where I stand.
By:
kingscrewed
When: 09 Jan 15 19:09
Last i saw on 365 was suspension  for penalty on 85and still sus on 92 donnt know how long before ft or abandoned was ft was called
By:
olderthebetter
When: 09 Jan 15 19:11
Read the translated version of the match on Heerenveens website, can't make out it out fully but can anyone who was watching confirm. For the incident when they walked was it there third penalty and they missed it but the ref ordered a retake to which Heerenveen had enough and walked?
By:
Mcik
When: 09 Jan 15 19:17
Yeah that would explain this message from Standard's Twitter:

"Third penalty awarded to Standard. The firing Jaadi is repelled by the goalkeeper. The referee decided to have it removed"

Translation is dodgy so I'm guessing that last bit should be retaken.

Reading Heerenveen's Twitter they seem to think the referee was taking the ****.
By:
Biscuit1979
When: 09 Jan 15 19:23
Seems an obvious fix to me, ref obviously told to ensure there were at least 3 goals.

How else do you explain 4 pens in one half and then ordering one to be re-taken for no valid reason.
By:
black shuck
When: 09 Jan 15 20:02
wheres my money betfair??????????
By:
MadVlad
When: 09 Jan 15 20:03
^ 72 hours laddie !
By:
choooke
When: 09 Jan 15 20:13
how loooooooooong will it take to give moneeeeey baaaaaaaaack :D
By:
Mcik
When: 09 Jan 15 20:18
It looks like they have settled as if match was played in full?
By:
Mcik
When: 09 Jan 15 20:20
I was on Under 3.5 Goals and settled as won.
By:
lurka
When: 09 Jan 15 20:44
Football 24s say heerenveen players walked off after 87 mins when ref gave a very dodgy pen. Ref had a full bank job on overs
By:
lurka
When: 09 Jan 15 20:45
from that tweet it looks like it may have been missed and he had it retaken! Dodgy coont. Who is he i wonder, keep an eye on his matches?
By:
joe9000
When: 09 Jan 15 20:53
https://vine.co/v/OpTxAe6eUw5
By:
joe9000
When: 09 Jan 15 20:53
ref gave pen 4 nothing
By:
lurka
When: 09 Jan 15 21:00
cheers Joe. Did you or anyone else see any of the other pens?
By:
Mcik
When: 09 Jan 15 21:03
It must have been a series of bad calls for the players to get to the point of walking off, whoever the referee was he needs investigating.
By:
lurka
When: 09 Jan 15 21:09
ref could have a gambling problem. Bigger problem now as his overs lost
By:
ganapati
When: 09 Jan 15 22:27
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kl-76IAV0X8
By:
Westender
When: 09 Jan 15 23:57
Yes I think the ref looks very desperate to ensure a 3rd goal Laugh

Poor fecker probably being hunted by the hoods as we speak.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com