|
By:
just what liverpool need a top pacey striker to keep suarez happy
|
|
By:
liverpool and Southampton echo's both reporting it's £4 million plus add on's
|
|
By:
£5 million?
|
|
By:
Yeh remind me of an old Andy Carroll
|
|
By:
hes the new shearer
|
|
By:
RASIAK, hello mate, whats your thoughts on all the transfer deals and the loss of the manager ? i am just hoping we get a half decent
replacement and the youngsters step up, the academy seem to keep producing, but i dont suppose we can rely on that alone. |
|
By:
There's no way Lambert is worth £9million. Liverpool normally pay double that.
|
|
By:
lamberts is 30+.........are liverpool mad
|
|
By:
...no they are not mad, 4 mill could be found down the back of brendan rodgers sofa...and for that you get an england striker...cracking deal imo.
|
|
By:
Saw this elsewhere and might be right...
Pay £9m for Lambert, £16m for Lallana = £25m and less money going to Bournmouth from the Lallana deal. Moneyball. |
|
By:
Very shrewd signing imo. Liverpool need decent quality back up with all their fixtures next year. He's a lifelong fan. If they get 3 good years at that price than he's a steal. No point blowing £25m on a striker who won't get a game and will cause trouble.
|
|
By:
T
|
|
By:
T
|
|
By:
The guy's 32 years old. Bad piece of business at that price.
|
|
By:
Talk about buying titles can no one just play fair
|
|
By:
Brendan hasn't though this through. Why his he weakening a team that are main challengers to Man United's 7th place.
|
|
By:
Johnny_Mustang 30 May 14 08:27
The guy's 32 years old. Bad piece of business at that price. 4m for an international striker who will provide decent back up and also qualifies as homegrown in the champions league squad listings is hardly bad business. In this day and age 4m is peanuts. |
|
By:
done deal apart from medical - which is tomorrow - for 4m+
|
|
By:
why are sky sports saying £9m?
that is well over the top. All other sites say £4m. Surely at 32 even £4m looks a bit high |
|
By:
Will gerrard let him take the penalties?
|
|
By:
Will he be on the pitch to take any penalties?
|
|
By:
Liverpool in 4 comps next season. A decent quality striker for 4m whose wages won't be that high is a no brainer really
|
|
By:
Liverpool basically had no one if Sturridge got injured or to change a game from the bench, now they've got one of the more productive strikers in the league for a few mill. Looks like a bargain to me, a long term one nope but if he helps them get in the CL again it's all good for them. I bet Southampton dont end up with better even if they spend 15m so I'm surprised they've sold him but perhaps given his age they felt they couldnt deny him the move so relucantly accepted.
|
|
By:
I'll feel a lot more confident seeing him come off the bench than Aspas, that's for sure.
Teams will sit a lot deeper against us next season, so there's no way we'll score a hundred plus league goals again. Lambert should give us an alternative point of attack, if & when the need arises. |
|
By:
you hope they sit off you mean , teams score for fun against yous so they might come at you even more unless the defence is stronger
|
|
By:
£4 doesn't even buy you a decent Championship striker , if he's fit and able (Froch is 36) then age playing up front shouldn't be too much of a barrier, like has been posted , Liverpool will be stretched thin as it is next season , having the luxury of Lambert in your squad is very good business.
|
|
By:
strange you think they would buy some defenders and a new pitch to stop SG from sliping
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
£4m is superb value. The real questions about this transfer need to be asked of Southampton not Liverpool.
|
|
By:
We could be here all night if we names duffers who cost more, but I'll throw Maiga, Altidore, van Wolfswinkel and Soldado into the mix.
|
|
By:
Chelsea fan advising to buy some more defenders
![]() I'm sure Jose will get to his 8-1-1 soon kid. |
|
By:
Probably a bad deal for both teams. Lambert is a durable, mid table striker and ideal for a team like Southampton who don't have the resources to have lots of alternatives in the squad. I think you get the best out of him when he plays every week rather than asking him for 10 minutes here and there in between the odd cup game. At Liverpool his best strengths are negated while at Southampton it's just going to mean every player is going to be talking to their agent about getting a move
|
|
By:
we,ve upped our bid for lallana up to 25m, they reckon anyway
|
|
By:
Stupid price for a 27 year old with 1 season in the top flight. Can buy established top class players for that money. If BR gets it wrong he will get a lot of flak for this signing. Really don't see what he offers that we haven't got. We need a midfield enforcer, have enough creative players.
|
|
By:
"RASIAK, hello mate, whats your thoughts on all the transfer deals and the loss of the manager ? i am just hoping we get a half decent replacement and the youngsters step up, the academy seem to keep producing, but i dont suppose we can rely on that alone."
Its really difficult to say until we see what manager we get, who's leaving, for how much money and who we get as a replacement. I'm not hugely fussed about Lambert leaving, he scored 13 goal last season in the Premiership but when you consider that includes 3 penalties, 2 free kicks, and the complete fluke against Swansea you're down to 7. Factor in goals from set peices and you see that the number of real 'striker's goals' he was scoring has dropped considerably, although i'll admit he did finish the season strongly. Either way I think he's probably past his best. Not a terrible deal for us. |
|
By:
not sure about the papers saying southampton need to sell to pay huge debts. ?? i thought we were in a good position financially....
obviously not.. ![]() |
|
By:
as you know, they had a rich owner who died, the next owner (relative) isnt a football fan.
Not sure what happens next, but lets be honest you are at a selling peak ? |
|
By:
lambert is an old fshioned centre forward like fowler and should score lots of goals at liverpool if played.
if sturridge flukes a goal in the world cup he will revert to his chelsea persona of thinking he's too good to pass the ball to anybody else and just want to score all the goals himself. I expect even a hopeless tactician like rodgers will quickly realise that lambert is much better for the team than sturridge. |
|
By:
Outpost, every single part of what you said is pure drivel.
|