Rafa would be getting a lot of stick if he'd have produced Chelsea's results/performances thus far this season. That and the non-starting/subbing of Mata, they'd be going mental. Loaning out Lukaku and keeping Torres too.
Rafa out!
Rafa would be getting a lot of stick if he'd have produced Chelsea's results/performances thus far this season. That and the non-starting/subbing of Mata, they'd be going mental. Loaning out Lukaku and keeping Torres too.Rafa out!
What is he playing at with Mata. Didn't he do the same with Robben. Look how that turned out. Mata amazing player. Fit into any team. You should never go back and i feel Mourinho was wrong to go back to chelsea.
What is he playing at with Mata. Didn't he do the same with Robben. Look how that turned out. Mata amazing player. Fit into any team. You should never go back and i feel Mourinho was wrong to go back to chelsea.
JM always ruins players with expression, if they dont track back = out
did it with robben, hazard was hopeless today but he tracked back, but mata was taken off. Such a robot manager, it may work but it will ruin so many players in the process.
JM always ruins players with expression, if they dont track back = outdid it with robben, hazard was hopeless today but he tracked back, but mata was taken off. Such a robot manager, it may work but it will ruin so many players in the process.
What is he playing at with Mata. Didn't he do the same with Robben. Look how that turned out. Mata amazing player. Fit into any team. You should never go back and i feel Mourinho was wrong to go back to chelsea.
Good point about Robben, when you look at how brilliant he has been for Bayern.
anfeild14 Sep 13 21:33What is he playing at with Mata. Didn't he do the same with Robben. Look how that turned out. Mata amazing player. Fit into any team. You should never go back and i feel Mourinho was wrong to go back to chelsea.Good point about
Robben was always injured for us. His problem was that he refused to play with the slightest niggle. It was that which led to him leaving.
You also wonder how the likes of Deco, Sneijder, Ronaldo and Ozil ever survived under Jose don't you?
It's actually absolute rubbish about Robben.Robben was always injured for us. His problem was that he refused to play with the slightest niggle. It was that which led to him leaving.You also wonder how the likes of Deco, Sneijder, Ronaldo and Ozil ev
he now has to work out how to get around parked buses .
mourinio is getting like wenger. cant move with the times and already becoming dated
mourinio will be flummoxed without drogba.he now has to work out how to get around parked buses .mourinio is getting like wenger.cant move with the times and already becoming dated
Makes it all the more confusing why they are happy to send Lukaku on loan again. He proved himself last season and he'd be a great option.
Torres has been finished for a couple of years now, just rubbish.
Makes it all the more confusing why they are happy to send Lukaku on loan again. He proved himself last season and he'd be a great option. Torres has been finished for a couple of years now, just rubbish.
I remember a time when the media always used to tell us how knowledgeable Liverpool fans were.
By god they're lucky this place didn't exist back then for them to keep that little myth going.
I remember a time when the media always used to tell us how knowledgeable Liverpool fans were.By god they're lucky this place didn't exist back then for them to keep that little myth going.
I don't think Mourinho is dated, but I do think the lack of a good striker will cost Chelsea a lot of points this season. I can't fathom this persistence with Torres -- my best guess is that it's an instruction from the owner.
I don't think Mourinho is dated, but I do think the lack of a good striker will cost Chelsea a lot of points this season. I can't fathom this persistence with Torres -- my best guess is that it's an instruction from the owner.
It's an area I'm amazed we didn't address just as we didn't last season.
The problem this summer is that the most sought after players have found other destinations opening up for them that weren't there before. It's not just us that seem to have found difficulty because United and Arsenal clearly didn't manage to get the kind of players they would have been planning on when last season ended.
Maybe we concentrated too much on Rooney I don't know. It may also have been United's difficulties bringing in players from their end that was the main reason for the block on that.
It's an area I'm amazed we didn't address just as we didn't last season.The problem this summer is that the most sought after players have found other destinations opening up for them that weren't there before. It's not just us that seem to have foun
The thing is, you already have Lukaku and he banged in 17 (?) goals in the league last year and you've loaned him out. Even if you kept him as a bench player, what a great option to have if you need to start being more direct (assuming that the skilful players haven't been able to work an opening). And he seems such a Mourinho type of forward.
Eto'o to replace Ba in the squad makes some sense. But I don't think it's a good idea to rely on him as the main man. He has been a superb player throughout his career, but he's 32 now, and has spent 2 seasons in Russia where his best league haul was 13 goals. Not bad, but nothing amazing.
IMO, Lukaku as the main man, Eto'o on the bench and Torres sweeping up and making the tea would be a better set-up.
The thing is, you already have Lukaku and he banged in 17 (?) goals in the league last year and you've loaned him out. Even if you kept him as a bench player, what a great option to have if you need to start being more direct (assuming that the skilf
Personally I'd have kept him purely for that option of going direct. The problem being he still has so much to learn that he's just not ready to be the main striker at a club like Chelsea at the moment. It was clear from pre season he still struggles to keep himself onside for example. Keeping him mainly on the bench and using him as an impact player could have led to him making some vital contributions but it wouldn't have helped to continue his development. I think that ended up being the deciding factor.
If Torres and Eto'o can get 15 each then that would be ok. Whether either of them can be relied upon to get goals that get you something out of games like today is the biggest concern though.
It's catch 22 with Lukaku.Personally I'd have kept him purely for that option of going direct. The problem being he still has so much to learn that he's just not ready to be the main striker at a club like Chelsea at the moment. It was clear from pre
well maybe its too early to really predict but its looks that way from last season and now this.
thought last season he was being a bit optimistci playing one holder with that back line.....playing alonso in there was a risk and then modric even riskier.
normally you can "get" what a good coach is thinking.
he isnt anywhere near his previous level imo
chelsea fans can be as blind as they want and throw all the usual insults they want....its your egyptian river.
I don't think Mourinho is datedwell maybe its too early to really predict but its looks that way from last season and now this.thought last season he was being a bit optimistci playing one holder with that back line.....playing alonso in there was a
Not sure about dated , just that he is not meeting expectations so far because the expectations of what he could do for the club were too high.
Chelsea have been 12 pts or more off the title pace for the last 2 seasons and people were taking for granted that Mourinho was going to add that just like he did in 2004.
What they'd overlooked was that in 2004 Drogba,Cech and Robben (who was brilliant for his first 18 months) arrived at the same time . Also Terry and Lampard were just coming to their peak years.True, Mourinho got more out of those players than most managers would, but still he simply had better players than he has now.
Not sure about dated , just that he is not meeting expectations so far because the expectations of what he could do for the club were too high.Chelsea have been 12 pts or more off the title pace for the last 2 seasons and people were taking for grant
Mourinho not only inherited a very talented side in 2004, he was given unlimited funds to strengthen it. Not only that, unlike today where there are now other mega-rich clubs, he had no competition in the transfer market & could sign pretty much who he wanted simply by outbidding everyone else & offering silly wages.
It's only early days yet. But he's got a big job on his hands if he's going to replicate what he achieved before in his first stint as Chelsea manager. The history books show that successful managers (in the English game) generally don't fare too well when they come back again. Chelsea could have done far worse than keeping Rafa on for another couple of seasons.
Mourinho not only inherited a very talented side in 2004, he was given unlimited funds to strengthen it. Not only that, unlike today where there are now other mega-rich clubs, he had no competition in the transfer market & could sign pretty much who
Tobermory that isn't true either, this squad of players is far stronger than 2004.
People tend to forget that the likes of Smertin, Tiago, Geremi, Kezman, Huth and Jarosik were important players within the squad. As was Glen Johnson who certainly wasn't at the level he is now. Also not many people will remember that Robben only actually started 14 league games in 2004.
It's really far too early to say he's not meeting expectations isn't it? One defeat in a game we should have won comfortably with the chances we had.
Tobermory that isn't true either, this squad of players is far stronger than 2004.People tend to forget that the likes of Smertin, Tiago, Geremi, Kezman, Huth and Jarosik were important players within the squad. As was Glen Johnson who certainly wasn
As was Glen Johnson who certainly wasn't at the level he is now.
what level is that then?
imo johnson has been poor from the word go. shockign defensively and papers over that sometimes because he can go on a run.
he cant even link the play up well enough these days...everything works too slow in his head.
As was Glen Johnson who certainly wasn't at the level he is now. what level is that then?imo johnson has been poor from the word go.shockign defensively and papers over that sometimes because he can go on a run.he cant even link the play up well enou
chelsea problem is up front no top class strikers did he need to buy schurrle think not eto too old torres hopeless lets lukaku go out on loan who looked good last season.
chelsea problem is up front no top class strikers did he need to buy schurrle think not eto too old torres hopeless lets lukaku go out on loan who looked good last season.
the dza 14 Sep 13 23:11 Makes it all the more confusing why they are happy to send Lukaku on loan again. He proved himself last season and he'd be a great option.
Torres has been finished for a couple of years now, just rubbish.
Have to agree. Crazy decision.
As was paying 30m+ for another attacking midfielder they don't need whilst still somehow selecting Obi Mikel in the holding role. Useless pile of sh*t.
the dza 14 Sep 13 23:11 Makes it all the more confusing why they are happy to send Lukaku on loan again. He proved himself last season and he'd be a great option.Torres has been finished for a couple of years now, just rubbish.Have to agree. Crazy d