Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
corridor of uncertainty
14 Apr 13 15:54
Joined:
Date Joined: 15 Feb 04
| Topic/replies: 359 | Blogger: corridor of uncertainty's blog
when will sky stop showing massive bias.

today we have seen an ex Sunderland chairman showing massive bias commentating on a Sunderland match, followed by an ex player who spent over 10 years at man u supporting on a man u match. surely they have enough people on their books not to show blatant favoritism in their football coverage.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 21
By:
The Forum Breader
When: 14 Apr 13 15:58
Its a football match. Not really that important.
By:
Dr.Cypionate
When: 14 Apr 13 16:03
A billion £ industry is not that important...
By:
Mr Spock
When: 14 Apr 13 16:08
If I was Sky I'd more worried about losing subscriptions for Sky Sports due the the standard of football being screened each week. This season with a few exceptions has been dire and with the amount of money going up next season (cue SSports rise) they will be in danger of losing their audience.
By:
ccjefc
When: 14 Apr 13 16:10
Couldn't agree more, Mr Spock. This has been the least exciting Premier League ever which is capped by a really mediocre side p1ssing it.
By:
Mr Spock
When: 14 Apr 13 16:12
Viewers will pay for the rise in money to the clubs (players) and I for one am close to having enough.
By:
corridor of uncertainty
When: 14 Apr 13 16:21
between them, the fa, premier league and uefa are destroying the top flite of english football.
By:
G Hall
When: 14 Apr 13 16:26
I cancelled sky sports,mine,was switched off last monday,really fed up with sky coverage,poor commentators tyler apart,niall quinn was the final straw,any game where he was the analyst,had to press mute button,really fed up with their arrogance and over priced package.So many poor games this season as well.
By:
John75
When: 14 Apr 13 16:29
Got to agree about Niall Quinn today.  I dont support newcastle or sunderland, but I couldnt believe how biased he was today.
By:
corridor of uncertainty
When: 14 Apr 13 16:30
add to that, the fact that redknapp is useless
By:
Mr Spock
When: 14 Apr 13 16:31
Half the PL starts out games trying not to concede and try and steal a goal because being relegated is now so costly the emphasis is on not to lose.
By:
berto77
When: 14 Apr 13 16:58
The general lack of quality commentators and pundits is startling when compared to other sports such as cricket.  Sky no better or worse than BBC or ITV.  I couldn't name more than a handful of decent ones.

I'm more annoyed at sky for their scheduling and match choices in recent weeks which have been shocking (including for Spanish games).  They should be pulling out all the aces to see off imminent competition from BT yet they've been poor recently.
By:
ian merseyside
When: 15 Apr 13 12:56
They are always going on about the PL being "the league of late goals".  I can't believe there are more late goals in the PL than in other leagues!  The other one that they were spouting on about until recently is that the title race will definitely "go to the wire".
By:
RichardHughes
When: 15 Apr 13 13:38
Half the PL starts out games trying not to concede and try and steal a goal because being relegated is now so costly the emphasis is on not to lose.

That why FIFA need to offer more reward for a win. In Rugby they offer a extra point rewarded if a team scores a number of tries but not sure how many.
By:
donny osmond
When: 15 Apr 13 13:47
The general lack of quality commentators and pundits is startling when compared to other sports such as cricket.  Sky no better or worse than BBC or ITV.  I couldn't name more than a handful of decent ones.


agree 100%


i wonder if that is because cricket attracts people with more understanding of their game, that need to find a career after playing, whereas..... most footballers struggle with speaking about the game, and those with that ability have the lure of management.... which is better paid (usually) than football punditry
By:
donny osmond
When: 15 Apr 13 13:49
i also dont know why england coverage needs to be so biased, im english but
dont need the jingoism of it all

(and again not just sky sports at it)
By:
PHILthePOWER
When: 16 Apr 13 09:36
do you mean that as english teams in the CL? because the favoritism of the comm's on those games are pathetic
By:
donny osmond
When: 16 Apr 13 09:41
well yes that is also true, i was meaning more engerland internationals, it would be
nice to get a balanced view for some of the bigger games we play


our local radio splits coverage for derby games, sunderland bias on one commentary, and
newcastle bias on the other, also happens for games involving middlesboro

i dont get the need for it all
By:
scaredmoney
When: 16 Apr 13 09:42
Not paid for SKY for about 3 years now,can usually get a stream 5-6 seconds behind live. I never ever listen to pundits during a game.
By:
BillyBunnsLane
When: 16 Apr 13 10:13
most footballers struggle with speaking about the game

Last three words not needed imho..
By:
shudacuda
When: 16 Apr 13 11:16
Sky have vastly overpaid for the new 3 year contract.

Now they will try and recoup it from the mug suscribers.
By:
Lemmiwinks
When: 16 Apr 13 12:18
Always thought football would start to struggle due to the ability to stream stuff on the internet so easily these days.

Maybe another 5-10 years.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com