Football
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
What happened in the match? It say's suspended (ABD)...anyone has an idea?
Show More
The match hasn't been voided yet does anyone know if the match will be played to a finish, still only about 8pm there.
there seems to be no info anywere on the net ive typed in on google audax italiano v colo colo match suspended and theres no news reports or any mention wether the game being replayed or void is there some kind of fix going down?
If you search for this match on Google News it comes up with a few things.
Such as:
http://deportes.terra.cl/futbol/primera-division/anfp-decidira-este-lunes-si-duelo-audax-colo-colo-se-reanuda,c9ad32bde03cd310VgnVCM10000098cceb0aRCRD.html
Translated version;
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=es&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fdeportes.terra.cl%2Ffutbol%2Fprimera-division%2Fanfp-decidira-este-lunes-si-duelo-audax-colo-colo-se-reanuda%2Cc9ad32bde03cd310VgnVCM10000098cceb0aRCRD.html
HTH
Such as:
http://deportes.terra.cl/futbol/primera-division/anfp-decidira-este-lunes-si-duelo-audax-colo-colo-se-reanuda,c9ad32bde03cd310VgnVCM10000098cceb0aRCRD.html
Translated version;
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=es&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fdeportes.terra.cl%2Ffutbol%2Fprimera-division%2Fanfp-decidira-este-lunes-si-duelo-audax-colo-colo-se-reanuda%2Cc9ad32bde03cd310VgnVCM10000098cceb0aRCRD.html
HTH
Read the link game could be continued.
Thats what you get for betting on that sh1te
Thats what you get for betting on that sh1te
done a bit of research an inquiry is to be held to what happened sometime this afternoon(chile time)and make there decision hope this helps
update!it looks like the anfp(chilian fa)have made a decision to terminate the match and the 3-1 scoreline will stand an official announcement will be 13.00pm chilie time
Just wondering this myself... I think this one will go 3 days until they settle it.
ANFP have just released a statement on their website confirming that the match will not be resumed
"ANFP Board agreed not to resume ITALIAN PARTY-COLO COLO AUDAX"
http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://www.anfp.cl/&prev=/search%3Fq%3Danfp%26hl%3Den%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D644&sa=X&ei=zf5ZUZXvDs7DPJjtgOAM&ved=0CDIQ7gEwAA
Therefore betfair can now void the suspended markets
"ANFP Board agreed not to resume ITALIAN PARTY-COLO COLO AUDAX"
http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://www.anfp.cl/&prev=/search%3Fq%3Danfp%26hl%3Den%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D644&sa=X&ei=zf5ZUZXvDs7DPJjtgOAM&ved=0CDIQ7gEwAA
Therefore betfair can now void the suspended markets
Here is the full article (translated from Spanish to English)
Board agreed not to resume ITALIAN PARTY-COLO COLO AUDAX
The decision was announced at a press conference the Executive Secretary of the National Professional Football Association, lawyer Oscar Fuentes.
The Board of the National Association of Professional Football, in accordance with the powers referred to in Articles 103 and 104 of the rules, decided not to resume the match in which Audax Italiano defeating Colo Colo 3-1, when the match at Estadio Bicentenario Florida was suspended at 57 'by referee Enrique Osses. With this decision, the audinos were confirmed as winners of the match.
In a press conference Monday in Quilín dependencies, the Executive Secretary of the Corporation, lawyer Oscar Fuentes announced the findings of the Board, he was met by more than six hours, in a match which also included Christian Barra , Chief of Stadium Security Plan; Pablo Pozo, president of the Referees Committee of the NPPA, and General of Police, Alejandro Olivares.
Oscar Fuentes gave details of the meeting: "The decision was not unanimous. It ended up being a resolution divided by four votes after the meeting-one resume. Each posture gave his arguments, which were treated and evaluated, "he said.
The executive announced Monday the ANFP filed a criminal complaint against those responsible for the events on campus Floridian, "and specifically, too, against an individual who was caught throwing objects. Accordingly, steps were taken in that context. "
He also explained the positions under discussion during the board meeting: "Those who voted for the end of the meeting felt that in this particular case and attended the referee's report, which stipulated an injury or attack on the wizard, the rule FIFA is determined by the relevant Code of Conduct and the suspension of the meeting proceeded without the ability to resume and consequently acted in that logic. At the same time, those who voted against ending the party, argued that it is a signal to the criminals, who may have interfered with the outcome of a sporting-by-unruly facts beyond security measures. That's what made it even more complex the Board's decision, because what is sought is that the family return to the stadium. "
Counsel also referred to the possible punishments that could affect the clubs involved: "Sanctions are in the Law of violence in stadiums and that's why we decided before this press conference to present a criminal complaint. Regarding sports sanctions within the footballing activity, are the powers of the Court of Penalties own, in Articles 66 and 66a, which were modified and adapted to the Act stadium violence, in the sense that, in If there is any negligence on the part of the organizers of the show, whether playing at home or, failing that, who plays the visit, the background will become available to the Disciplinary Tribunal. "
Board agreed not to resume ITALIAN PARTY-COLO COLO AUDAX
The decision was announced at a press conference the Executive Secretary of the National Professional Football Association, lawyer Oscar Fuentes.
The Board of the National Association of Professional Football, in accordance with the powers referred to in Articles 103 and 104 of the rules, decided not to resume the match in which Audax Italiano defeating Colo Colo 3-1, when the match at Estadio Bicentenario Florida was suspended at 57 'by referee Enrique Osses. With this decision, the audinos were confirmed as winners of the match.
In a press conference Monday in Quilín dependencies, the Executive Secretary of the Corporation, lawyer Oscar Fuentes announced the findings of the Board, he was met by more than six hours, in a match which also included Christian Barra , Chief of Stadium Security Plan; Pablo Pozo, president of the Referees Committee of the NPPA, and General of Police, Alejandro Olivares.
Oscar Fuentes gave details of the meeting: "The decision was not unanimous. It ended up being a resolution divided by four votes after the meeting-one resume. Each posture gave his arguments, which were treated and evaluated, "he said.
The executive announced Monday the ANFP filed a criminal complaint against those responsible for the events on campus Floridian, "and specifically, too, against an individual who was caught throwing objects. Accordingly, steps were taken in that context. "
He also explained the positions under discussion during the board meeting: "Those who voted for the end of the meeting felt that in this particular case and attended the referee's report, which stipulated an injury or attack on the wizard, the rule FIFA is determined by the relevant Code of Conduct and the suspension of the meeting proceeded without the ability to resume and consequently acted in that logic. At the same time, those who voted against ending the party, argued that it is a signal to the criminals, who may have interfered with the outcome of a sporting-by-unruly facts beyond security measures. That's what made it even more complex the Board's decision, because what is sought is that the family return to the stadium. "
Counsel also referred to the possible punishments that could affect the clubs involved: "Sanctions are in the Law of violence in stadiums and that's why we decided before this press conference to present a criminal complaint. Regarding sports sanctions within the footballing activity, are the powers of the Court of Penalties own, in Articles 66 and 66a, which were modified and adapted to the Act stadium violence, in the sense that, in If there is any negligence on the part of the organizers of the show, whether playing at home or, failing that, who plays the visit, the background will become available to the Disciplinary Tribunal. "
despite posting that in here no doubt it will still take Betfair a couple of days to twig themselves and get this market sorted
"If a match starts but is later abandoned or postponed and is not completed (i.e. 90 minutes of play according to the match officials, plus any stoppage time) within three days of the scheduled start date, all bets will be void except for those on markets which have been unconditionally determined."
All bets will be void, except where the market has already been fully settled, ie half time result, some over/under markets, and so on. Otherwise, all the rest, and especially the match odds market, will be void. The fact that the chilean fa says the result stands is irrelevant. From a betfair rules point of view all that matters is that the match won't be replayed or resumed within three days. When they will actually void and return bets I do not know! For those greened up on some of the higher overs markets or on match odds this will be a bummer, but the rule is there to protect all parties on the exchange and is entirely fair.
All bets will be void, except where the market has already been fully settled, ie half time result, some over/under markets, and so on. Otherwise, all the rest, and especially the match odds market, will be void. The fact that the chilean fa says the result stands is irrelevant. From a betfair rules point of view all that matters is that the match won't be replayed or resumed within three days. When they will actually void and return bets I do not know! For those greened up on some of the higher overs markets or on match odds this will be a bummer, but the rule is there to protect all parties on the exchange and is entirely fair.
what biscuit said. official result is a 3-1 win. surprised this hasn't been settled. if you void it, it sends out a message that anyone can back a team, and if they're getting beat you can get out of it by ripping up some seats and bunging them onto the pitch.
Any unsettled markets will be voided including match odds
Therefore settled goal markets such as over 2.5 goals will remain settled
However, the unsettled markets such as match odds and over 4.5 goals will be void
That's the way it's always been for situations such as this and understandably so
Therefore settled goal markets such as over 2.5 goals will remain settled
However, the unsettled markets such as match odds and over 4.5 goals will be void
That's the way it's always been for situations such as this and understandably so
why BF don't void the bets now if they know it is not going to be resumed? Will they wait the 72 hours?
From past experience, I've often seen these kind of markets get voided late morning of a Monday. As it was a bank holiday in England yesterday, I wouldn't be surprised to see it done before 12 today.
.... and so my 200+ green on Audax to win went POOF.
Not happy Betfair Manager... not happy.
And why can't a courtesy email or message be sent to tell me that i've been shafted instead of me having to wonder and search hundreds of bets to find the outcome?
Not happy!
Not happy Betfair Manager... not happy.
And why can't a courtesy email or message be sent to tell me that i've been shafted instead of me having to wonder and search hundreds of bets to find the outcome?
Not happy!
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539