Oct 28, 2012 -- 12:41PM, berto77 wrote:
In fairness to Clattenburg, the only decision he got wrong was the second yellow for Torres. He's not had a bad game
He's had a good game, ABU's are too myopic to see this though.
Oct 28, 2012 -- 12:44PM, Srichaphan or Ancic? wrote:
Chelsea fans jeering the referee who handed them many previous odd decisions.
no doubt i would because this ref is joke to me
Oct 28, 2012 -- 12:48PM, Maestro_71 wrote:
should be blaming the linesman not the ref. the sending off was debatable and refs are under pressure to stop diving so i don't see what he's done that wrong. U all just seething chelsea backers i presume?
yep ^^
Oct 28, 2012 -- 12:48PM, Maz_- wrote:
Oct 28, 2012 -- 5:48PM, Maestro_71 wrote:should be blaming the linesman not the ref. the sending off was debatable and refs are under pressure to stop diving so i don't see what he's done that wrong. U all just seething chelsea backers i presume?yep ^^
+ 1,000,000
Oct 28, 2012 -- 12:51PM, Lemmiwinks wrote:
hahaha yeah
thats class
Oct 28, 2012 -- 12:51PM, pauliow wrote:
I'd love it if Chelsea equalised
probably 90% of the country is with you on that one...
Oct 28, 2012 -- 12:52PM, high_lander wrote:
i am winning the exact same amount whoever wins... i layed united when 1 and 2 nil up then greened out when chelsea equalisedclattenburg should be banned from referring top class football after thistorres did not dive it is NOT debatable
king ABU
Oct 28, 2012 -- 12:53PM, berto77 wrote:
I didn't think it was a yellow highlander but from the angle bend the Chelsea goal ie clattenburgs angle, it looked like it might be a dive.
Behind not bend.
Oct 28, 2012 -- 12:56PM, high_lander wrote:
berto77 you can only book a player (especially when the player will be sent off) when you are 100% sure they have dived
the contact loooked minimal and torres went down easily. Not saying it deserved a yellow but Mr Clattenberg tried to make an example and sent him off! Thats that my friend.
Oct 28, 2012 -- 12:56PM, Biscuit1979 wrote:
RMB - stop spouting your usual b*llocks and get back to the X Factor forum
not very nice Biscuit...i would say that everybody is entitled to their opinion and post wherever they feel like it, dont you think?
Oct 28, 2012 -- 12:56PM, high_lander wrote:
berto77 you can only book a player (especially when the player will be sent off) when you are 100% sure they have dived
Yes I agree. I thought he was clipped and didn't dive. It was a poor decision. I'm just saying from that angle it looked debatable, as was suggested earlier.
Oct 28, 2012 -- 12:58PM, maxjak wrote:
oooooH!! MR clattenburg?.........go to the back of the class Maz jnr
Sour grapes? how much did u lose? Get back to your bedroom mummy will be bringing dinner soon.
Oct 28, 2012 -- 12:57PM, jeyton wrote:
Oct 28, 2012 -- 5:56PM, Biscuit1979 wrote:RMB - stop spouting your usual b*llocks and get back to the X Factor forumnot very nice Biscuit...i would say that everybody is entitled to their opinion and post wherever they feel like it, dont you think?
Biscuits likes to hound people, strange unpleasant obsessive character. Happy to say this is an anonymous forum, worrying people like him exist.
Oct 28, 2012 -- 1:01PM, high_lander wrote:
why should anyone be made and "example" as you put it? every decision should be made on it's own merits. you cant be sending players off and spoiling a game of football because you think he might have dived ffs. the ref is a clown and should be relegated to the lower leagues and that my friend is the end of that. i feel sure that chelsea will go after clattenburg now. i highly dount you will ever see him officiate at a chelsea match again if at any epl game.
thats y i am saying Clattenberg is a complete id!ot. You have to be 100% sure its a dive.