ural game

the home side were available to lay at 1.25 for ages til it was corrected

total carnage

goal disallowed...

after 2 mins...

170 gbp matched at 1000 for 1-1

absolutely 100s matched at 1000

Ural scored a goal,but it was offside and market reacted as if it was allowed

i think somebody is trading out get on the 1-1.

Bets will be voided surely?

at a wrong price

now is that allowed?

Lol again?! disallowed ??

wtf??? twice

Some people laughing all the way to the bank here

this has to be the most weird game i ever witnessed

i just lost 40 laying 1-1

This is free money

wow henok

THIS IS A JOKE.. HAS ANYONE SEEN THE 1-1 BET OF 15K AT 3.2.. THE REF MAYBE?

Russian football is finnish

someone is going to the poor house today

1.2 at 93mins
how long left?

glad i didnt lose in this game. would have been a large sum

this is a joke.. anyone seem the 15k bet at 3.2 on 1-1!!1 the ref maybe??

1-1 layed at 1000 (53£) ?

1000        £53    £170

i think if someone fix it this way, it is brilliat. score a goal back at 1000. disallow a goal after few minutes.

FT 1-1

Ref had a direct line to his employers
what a fix

absouletly amazing game. did anyone get some of the offer at above 100. i dont watch games normally so i couldt decide to back the 1-1.

waiting for my £2 at 1000 on the 1-1 to come in
Wonder if it will happen

Is the goal for Khimki going to be disallowed in 2nd half?

weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Well that was the strangest game i've betted on...took me a while to figure out the score was still 1-1!

brucewills why didt you put more. there were enough time, if u knew it was still 1-1

did that seriously pay out?

Total disgrace imo. Only a week or so ago, i had a bet voided due to the fact that a goal had been scored before the suspension was put in.
This is no different only that a goal has not gone in. Surely the Suspension should not be lifted until it's certain the goal has been given or disallowed. It happens too regularly to be coincidence imo.

I do not know! I thought this is surely a mistake and panicked !!

174£ layed 1-1 at 1000's

Some other's getting rich here

Jul 16, 2012 -- 4:55PM, ronin4s wrote:

did that seriously pay out?

i thin it would. dont see any reason for not paying.

Jul 16, 2012 -- 4:55PM, mightyfly wrote:

Total disgrace imo. Only a week or so ago, i had a bet voided due to the fact that a goal had been scored before the suspension was put in. This is no different only that a goal has not gone in. Surely the Suspension should not be lifted until it's certain the goal has been given or disallowed. It happens too regularly to be coincidence imo.

Did Betfair send you an email to let you know it happened? I had the same experience and only found when by going through my "statement"

Jul 16, 2012 -- 4:55PM, mightyfly wrote:

Total disgrace imo. Only a week or so ago, i had a bet voided due to the fact that a goal had been scored before the suspension was put in. This is no different only that a goal has not gone in. Surely the Suspension should not be lifted until it's certain the goal has been given or disallowed. It happens too regularly to be coincidence imo.

is there any rule which specifies this

layed 1-1 - saw a goal flash up. thought nothing more until 5 mins later realised been chalked off.
backed the 1-1 for minimal loss as was large chunk laying at 3.2 with 10-15mins left
all round a lucky escape !

No, i had to email Betfair and ask for an explanation as to why my stake had been reduced. I had put in a lay which was gradually being taken before finally getting all matched. During this time a goal was scored so they voided the portion of bets that were taken after the goal was scored.

What i am saying is that this is exactly the same, just in reverse.

Betfair would quote that it is user beware in this situation. ( Different rules for different times i say )

Ty Mightyfly, I had to spend about 3 hours doing math, using that excuse betfair call a "statement". In the end by Cashout and green numbers had not been reset even though the game played on for another hour. I was trading on their numbers but they werent accurate, so they got to profit from misleading me on the odds?!

I lost £30, I normally only trade with £2 stake at start, so that was huge loss to me.

I am very surprised that Betfair don't re-open the markets when they are sure the goal has been given or not. This cannot be too difficult to put in place.
They should look into the £85 matched at 1000 to see who snaffled it all up.( To see if there are any suspicious circumstances)

Have Betfair settled the correct score and u2.5 markets? Other markets have been settled.

if i lose money fair and square then fair enough but there's something fishy about this match.

if you were watching the game like me you'd know the goal was offside straight away

By the look of it all markets have been settled. But on the basis of this, it's wide open for anybody who's reporting the correct score, or any goals scored or disallowed to manipulate the market.
You'd only need to do it once and have your back in at 1000 to make a killing and bugger off.

Stringer.

That may be so, but that does not excuse the fact that the market was re-opened on the basis that a goal had been scored and that it was 2-1.

got most of it back on the lahti match so all good.

stringer, did u back 1-1 at high odds

Yes the markets paid out
Slightly expecting betfair to take the winnings back

I'm guessing that whoever got the majority of the £85 at 1000 laid £7500 back at 3.2 on the 1-1, and also laid in the match odds market as it was trading over Evs with 4 minutes left to play.

i think this things happen, the strange thing on this game was the fact prices didnt correct soon enough

Jul 16, 2012 -- 5:48PM, mightyfly wrote:

I'm guessing that whoever got the majority of the £85 at 1000 laid £7500 back at 3.2 on the 1-1, and also laid in the match odds market as it was trading over Evs with 4 minutes left to play.

agreed

was a nice opportunity to trade between over2.5 and cs

I'd be interested to know whether or not, the over 2.5 goal market re-opened at the same time as the correct score market and match odds market.
If it did not open up at the same time, then the markets were re-opened on the strength of a goal being scored making it 2-1.( And as all unmatched bets were scrapped, i suggest this must have been the case)

Good luck to the guy's who gained from this, but it still doesn't make it right, that the market should have been suspended again and matched bets inbetween the 2 suspensions made void.

Question is who was the unlucky person to lay 1-1 @1000?

stringer, did u back 1-1 at high odds

i didn't check the market after the gol