GOOD AFTERNOON FOLLOWERS, WE ONCE AGAIN HAVE A CERTAIN BANKER TODAY IN THE FORM OF THE CHAMPIONS ELECT
MANCHESTER CITY WILL BE BUOYED BY MANURE'S COLLAPSE TODAY AND THEY COULDN'T HAVE AN EASIER GAME TO WIN - WOLVES WHO HAVE NOTHING TO PLAY FOR AND IN SHOCKING FORM
AND WHAT'S MORE - YOU CAN BACK CITY AT1.22 TO WIN!
1.22 (ONE POINT TWO TWO) FOR WHAT SHOULD BE A 1.04 SHOT AT BEST
PEOPLE HAVE OBVIOUSLY FORGOTTEN HOW GOOD CITY ARE AND HOW BAD WOLVES ARE
SO LOAD UP FOLLOWERS, AND INCREASE YOUR BANK WITH EASE
Wolves' record against Manchester City is actually rather good. They have won six of their last nine home league games against City stretching over the course of 30 years. The most recent was last season and nine of the 11 City players who started the 2 -1 defeat at Molineux then could very well be on show again; only Adebayor and Boateng are not around this time.
Wolves' record against Manchester City is actually rather good. They have won six of their last nine home league games against City stretching over the course of 30 years. The most recent was last season and nine of the 11 City players who started th
How the f*c* do you make Man City a 1.04 when people who are paid to compile odds and probably know far more than yo, make them a 1.22 shot. Or put another way, a 20 per cent chance City won't win. I suppose you made Man Utd a 1.14 shot today.
How the f*c* do you make Man City a 1.04 when people who are paid to compile odds and probably know far more than yo, make them a 1.22 shot. Or put another way, a 20 per cent chance City won't win.I suppose you made Man Utd a 1.14 shot today.
Why are you using followers plural when it's basic English when you refer to one person you do so in the singular. That's assuming you have as many as one followers(sic) who's not your mum or wife or care worker.
Why are you using followers plural when it's basic English when you refer to one person you do so in the singular. That's assuming you have as many as one followers(sic) who's not your mum or wife or care worker.