Football
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Any idea if this will be today
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 94
|
By:
jury out
i think before 5pm |
|
By:
probably yes, the jury are have been out for a couple of hours now.
|
|
By:
He'll only get a fine I expect.
|
|
By:
I can tell you the verdict of the Betfair forum:
Guilty: Correct Not Guilty: He only got off because it's good old Arry'. |
|
By:
40k fine
even-stevens  |
|
By:
doubt it. courts don't often carry on beyond about 4 and 3 hours today including lunch isn't very long.
tomorrow heavy odds on for me |
|
By:
Forum braced for meltdown if he gets off.
|
|
By:
could be a split---one let off/other guilty
|
|
By:
i don't think it can be xmoneyx
|
|
By:
GOING BY THE JUDGES COMMENTS TO THE JURY HE'S A CERT TO GET OFF
|
|
By:
what was judges comments?
|
|
By:
I expected the prosecution to have far more substantial evidence than they've shown to prove guilt, I'd expect a not guilty from everything I've seen and heard presented. Just my opinion on matters though.
|
|
By:
He said that they were of previous good character and should be believed basically.
|
|
By:
He will get off, its a difficult one but agree with buzzer
|
|
By:
agree buzzer.
|
|
By:
YEAH BASICALLY SAID LET THEM OFF YOU KNOW IT MAKES SENSE
|
|
By:
prosecution case was NOTW
lucky timing |
|
By:
You're so right, xmoneyx
|
|
By:
4/6 he gets off
11/8 found guilty |
|
By:
4/6?
MORE LIKE 1/6 |
|
By:
money talks , redknapp walks.
|
|
By:
http://oi41.tinypic.com/keyc6x.jpg - Odds
Am taking punts if you fancy it. Money up front. |
|
By:
there is no smoking gun and no concrete proof of deliberately avoiding tax
|
|
By:
2.6 not guilty is massive!!!
|
|
By:
It has been backed. I was 3.75 initially.
|
|
By:
A monkey on guilty at 2.6, pls.
 |
|
By:
Down to 2.25 now. Lot of sharp money for it.
|
|
By:
sent home for the night
|
|
By:
is that good/bad for not guilty verdict?
|
|
By:
if they'd have come back this afternoon would have been definite not guilty.
don't get many juries coming back after only a few hours. judge all but directed for an acquittal emphasing the good character of the defendants |
|
By:
If I was on the jury I'd have been angling for one more day off work. #justsaying ;-)
|
|
By:
AGREE WITH RF DAY OFF WORK MOST LIKELY SCENARIO
DO THEY GET PUT UP IN A HOTEL OR GO HOME? MAY BE ANOTHER REASON |
|
By:
judge also wants unanimous verdict. surely one of them will be a closet spurs fan. the judge has practically ordered a not guilty verdict for Arry.
|
|
By:
agree on judges comments... will get not guilty!!! less theres a gooner on jury making a stand for guilty
|
|
By:
OJ simpson got off so harry is 1.01 the loveable rogue
|
|
By:
the fact that the defence spend very little time on their summing up tells you their confidence in their case
|
|
By:
not guilty, it's a good thing!
|
|
By:
All being above board, I'd go 1.01 guilty, where do people think this offshore account in the name of his dog appeared from, and it's just a fantastic coincedence that no tax was paid on the money which was in it? Really?!?
Only thing I am worried about is that we could get a repeat of the Gerrard affair when it was 100% certain that he assaulted that bloke in the nightclub, but needless to say the chance of a Liverpool jury finding their most famous player guilty is about the same as San Marino winning the next world cup! I can't believe some of the comments on here, do people actually believe the "I have no idea what I'm doing financially, can't even fill out a teamsheet or write properly" cobblers?  |
|
By:
it seems to me that if the geezer who gave him the money has told harry that tax had already been paid on it then that lets harry off the hook, unless the prosecution can prove that the money came from somewhere else and tax hadn't been paid on it.
even then the crown has to prove that #arry knew it was iffy money. the fact that he put the money in a spurious name is neither here nor there as far as i can see. |