Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
par
27 Jul 10 11:47
Joined:
Date Joined: 20 Jul 01
| Topic/replies: 8,072 | Blogger: par's blog
I would be obliged if some of you football lads could give an opinion on a bet a mate asked for

He has an accumulator and part of it is Celtic to win SPL, Dundee Utd to win SPL w/out Rangers and Celtic

Manager phoned bet in and was told these bets were related and could not be placed on the same accumulator

Opinions would be welcome

Thanks

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 19
By:
Joey Bartons cell mate.
When: 27 Jul 10 11:48
Manager is correct..
By:
Joey Bartons cell mate.
When: 27 Jul 10 11:49
But l think you knew that already..[;)]
By:
Video_Lounge
When: 27 Jul 10 11:49
correct
By:
par
When: 27 Jul 10 11:50
How are the bets related ?
By:
sticky butt
When: 27 Jul 10 11:51
they aint related ffs, 2 different bets
By:
Joey Bartons cell mate.
When: 27 Jul 10 11:52
Put your rod away..
By:
francois
When: 27 Jul 10 11:52
If dundee uts win the league then they have also won it without rangers and celtic, maybe unlikely but still related
By:
Veridis Quo
When: 27 Jul 10 11:53
Given that it's mathematically possible for Dundee Utd to win the SPL outright, it's more related in the favour of the bookmaker in my very honest and humble opinion. Marginally of course, but yes.
By:
Perry1980
When: 27 Jul 10 11:53
what price Utd w/o Old Firm????
By:
par
When: 27 Jul 10 11:55
correct francois, but then the bet is down on Celtic

so as rightly pointed out by veridis quo it favours the bookmaker
By:
par
When: 27 Jul 10 11:56
he was asking for 13/8 ( I think ) with the tote
By:
francois
When: 27 Jul 10 11:57
yes fair point, didnt read that very well did i!
By:
par
When: 27 Jul 10 11:57
I suppose Francois that is the related contingency part, that by doing well, Dundee Utd could conceivably effect the other part of the bet and thus cannot be accepted

Unlikely, yes, but , possible

Then again , how bad the old firm are, not so impossible.
By:
AJSmith
When: 27 Jul 10 11:58
I don't know where people get the impression from that everything bookies do is to screw people. The rules are that related bets aren't allowed, whether it favours the bookie or the customer. Just because in this case it favours the bookie doesn't mean they're going to take it.
By:
Veridis Quo
When: 27 Jul 10 11:58
Because there's a degree of confusion of what can and can't be permed with same-league betting (A to win, B to be relegated etc), bookmakers decide to just call it singles on everything, with the exception of match betting which is slightly different. If I was a bookie I'd take the bet.
By:
danny c
When: 27 Jul 10 11:58
still related fella whether you like it or not. in reality they prob should take the bet but the manager goes by the set of rules he has in front of him!
By:
par
When: 27 Jul 10 12:01
thanks lads,

two mates placed the same bet, one got on the other (larger bet) got referred and refused

the one who got bet on wanted advice on whether he should go back and get bet checked

having taken your comments, he should

Thanks very much lads, much appreciated
By:
par
When: 27 Jul 10 14:53
turns out, they went back in and queried the bet, the bet is perfectly fine and has been accepted

not related
By:
marychain1
When: 27 Jul 10 14:56
what a lovely ending
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com