Given that it's mathematically possible for Dundee Utd to win the SPL outright, it's more related in the favour of the bookmaker in my very honest and humble opinion. Marginally of course, but yes.
Given that it's mathematically possible for Dundee Utd to win the SPL outright, it's more related in the favour of the bookmaker in my very honest and humble opinion. Marginally of course, but yes.
I suppose Francois that is the related contingency part, that by doing well, Dundee Utd could conceivably effect the other part of the bet and thus cannot be accepted
Unlikely, yes, but , possible
Then again , how bad the old firm are, not so impossible.
I suppose Francois that is the related contingency part, that by doing well, Dundee Utd could conceivably effect the other part of the bet and thus cannot be acceptedUnlikely, yes, but , possibleThen again , how bad the old firm are, not so impossibl
I don't know where people get the impression from that everything bookies do is to screw people. The rules are that related bets aren't allowed, whether it favours the bookie or the customer. Just because in this case it favours the bookie doesn't mean they're going to take it.
I don't know where people get the impression from that everything bookies do is to screw people. The rules are that related bets aren't allowed, whether it favours the bookie or the customer. Just because in this case it favours the bookie
Because there's a degree of confusion of what can and can't be permed with same-league betting (A to win, B to be relegated etc), bookmakers decide to just call it singles on everything, with the exception of match betting which is slightly different. If I was a bookie I'd take the bet.
Because there's a degree of confusion of what can and can't be permed with same-league betting (A to win, B to be relegated etc), bookmakers decide to just call it singles on everything, with the exception of match betting which is slightly
still related fella whether you like it or not. in reality they prob should take the bet but the manager goes by the set of rules he has in front of him!
still related fella whether you like it or not. in reality they prob should take the bet but the manager goes by the set of rules he has in front of him!
two mates placed the same bet, one got on the other (larger bet) got referred and refused
the one who got bet on wanted advice on whether he should go back and get bet checked
having taken your comments, he should
Thanks very much lads, much appreciated
thanks lads,two mates placed the same bet, one got on the other (larger bet) got referred and refusedthe one who got bet on wanted advice on whether he should go back and get bet checkedhaving taken your comments, he shouldThanks very much lads, much