i reckon there's a bit of talking through the pocket here.
the tackle on rvp was a foul, but no malice, or recklessness, and the shirtlifting thing is only a booking if he's displaying a political message.
i reckon there's a bit of talking through the pocket here.the tackle on rvp was a foul, but no malice, or recklessness, and the shirtlifting thing is only a booking if he's displaying a political message.
But if yo ugo to ground like that, its reckless. I think Royle said he had his eye on the ball or some such..but if you look at the rest of the bookings, I would be surprised if there were any worse than that challenge, and I would question if there was malice in all of them too...
mex, its all very well taking about malice on RVP.But if yo ugo to ground like that, its reckless. I think Royle said he had his eye on the ball or some such..but if you look at the rest of the bookings, I would be surprised if there were any worse t
err..the law says he shall be booked if he displays a political message.
if he dosen't know whether he's displayed a political message or not, how on earth can he book him.
is this the midset of the overs on cards backers?
"if in doubt get one out"
err..the law says he shall be booked if he displays a political message.if he dosen't know whether he's displayed a political message or not, how on earth can he book him.is this the midset of the overs on cards backers?"if in doubt get one out"
either way, you are rightly entitled to your opinions mex but i wasnt talking thru my pocket or anything similar - just expressing my opinion/belief that revealing message under shirt should be a booking :) good day to you sir
either way, you are rightly entitled to your opinions mex but i wasnt talking thru my pocket or anything similar - just expressing my opinion/belief that revealing message under shirt should be a booking :) good day to you sir
care to produce the exact wording of said rule? and i find it a shame that you find the need to be so uptight over someone expressing an opinion - ive already said 'fair enough' if you are right, so why not get over yourself?
care to produce the exact wording of said rule? and i find it a shame that you find the need to be so uptight over someone expressing an opinion - ive already said 'fair enough' if you are right, so why not get over yourself?
i can see that. wouldn't have booked him myself, but i realise some would.
i thought joe royle called it about right, and if it was a fiery game i dare say he would have "got one out"
ally;i can see that. wouldn't have booked him myself, but i realise some would.i thought joe royle called it about right, and if it was a fiery game i dare say he would have "got one out"
i'm not getting uptight at all.merely pointing out what is expected of refs as per their duties and responsibilities.
if you'd care to peruse the law you can probably access it via the uefa website where there's likely to be a link to the laws of the game.
i'm not getting uptight at all.merely pointing out what is expected of refs as per their duties and responsibilities.if you'd care to peruse the law you can probably access it via the uefa website where there's likely to be a link to the laws of the