Exchange Games
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
When playing omaha tonight (Hand id 44702814), hand 2 which had the cards 8 8 9 6 went to 1.01 after the flop, as the flop was a strange 999, giving it 4 of a kind.
As expected, hands 3 and 4 were eliminated but hand 1 (Kd 10d Qs 2d) was still in the game (at odds of 520 ish).
I wondered why this hand had not been eliminated also, but, after glancing at the cards I realised that if a Jack of diamonds came out next, then hand 1 would have a potential straight flush, which would beat the 4 of a kind.
I then thought to myself that it is a guarantee that the next card to come out will be the jack of diamonds and much to my surprise (NOT) the jack of diamonds pops out meaning that all of a sudden, hand 2 which had flopped 4 of a kind had a chance of losing.
My point being is that situations like this occur so many times. You can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy what card/what suit will be coming out next.
The hands seem to be programmed to maximise the amounts bet on them each round.
Usually, you end up at the river stage where 1 hand has a striaght draw, one has a flush draw. one will have 2 pairs (potential full house draw), then the final hand which has just a pair will end up hitting trips and winning.
Obv this occurs in real omaha but no where near to the percentages that it occurs on here.
Play these games at your own peril!
As expected, hands 3 and 4 were eliminated but hand 1 (Kd 10d Qs 2d) was still in the game (at odds of 520 ish).
I wondered why this hand had not been eliminated also, but, after glancing at the cards I realised that if a Jack of diamonds came out next, then hand 1 would have a potential straight flush, which would beat the 4 of a kind.
I then thought to myself that it is a guarantee that the next card to come out will be the jack of diamonds and much to my surprise (NOT) the jack of diamonds pops out meaning that all of a sudden, hand 2 which had flopped 4 of a kind had a chance of losing.
My point being is that situations like this occur so many times. You can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy what card/what suit will be coming out next.
The hands seem to be programmed to maximise the amounts bet on them each round.
Usually, you end up at the river stage where 1 hand has a striaght draw, one has a flush draw. one will have 2 pairs (potential full house draw), then the final hand which has just a pair will end up hitting trips and winning.
Obv this occurs in real omaha but no where near to the percentages that it occurs on here.
Play these games at your own peril!
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 9
|
By:
You can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy what card/what suit will be coming out next.
Hmmm... maybe a trading strategy is possible here!  |
|
By:
Seems to me that alot of People try and be a smart arse on this forum.They give replies thinking there really funny when really there boring b@stards.The above "NZBOT" being one of them.
I totally get were MIKEAL MADAR is comeing from.You can predict the next card with a pretty high percentage rate when your "involved" in that game.When your not its alot more difficult. These Games are an absaloute sham.Disgusts Me that they are allowed to operate.I do notice they operate under a Maltese Licence and not a British one.Says it all really !!!!!  |
|
By:
@MAYWEEBOOKET: I didn't try to be funny or anything, just expressed my point of view. Accept it or leave it.
BTW: Your language is VERY offensive and as such should not be tolarated in this discussion board !!! |
|
By:
What language is that NZBOT ? No foul language used by Me.
I feel you were being a bit of a smart arse.If you weren't then no worries.That being the case then I apologise. |
|
By:
What language is that NZBOT ? No foul language used by Me.
--> They give replies thinking there really funny when really there boring b@stards.The above "NZBOT" being one of them. |
|
By:
In my School there was no such word as B@stards.I've never even seen a word with an "@" in before.I can only presume your from a different planet were that word would be classed as Bad Language.That being the case just 4uck off then
 |
|
By:
In my School there was no such word as B@stards.I've never even seen a word with an "@" in before.I can only presume your from a different planet were that word would be classed as Bad Language.That being the case just 4uck off then
|
|
By:
In my School there was no such word as B@stards.I've never even seen a word with an "@" in before.I can only presume your from a different planet were that word would be classed as Bad Language.That being the case just 4uck off then
|
|
By:
So good they posted it 3 times
|