Just A Thought

Swift see my topic question above......do you know the answer to it.
I don't although I have a view

No mathematical logic in that idea I'm afraid to say.

I agree there is no mathematical logic in the idea, since the games are random is it not difficult to apply mathematical logic that will effectively produce a result, so would a randon element within a strategy tip the odds in our favor so to speak. Maybe or maybe not, im just persuing the idea. I have implemented a random element into a strategy i've been working with for a while to try to improve it, had some intersting and encouraging results.

Lost me I'm afraid.
Random + random = random.
Methinks
Random vs random = random.
Methinks
Random squared=random
Methinks
etc etc etc

you think to much

random certainly works Swift - micro trading £2 lays
painful though, 20 mins of doing this seems like 5 hours

started feb6 with 300 now up 2.8k xpoker an hour a day

on 4-5 days in any week

If what you say is true, then quit while you are ahead.
If you're truly only making lays in the flat amount of 2 quid, day in day out on a purely random basis then, unless the odds are good value ( which they're not-indisputable fact btw) you must eventually lose.
It might take a while and be a slow process, but it WILL happen.
Otherwise all known laws of mathematics are completely and utterly wrong.
Don't think so somehow, do you ?

Hallgate
You don't ?

I agree in the sense all systems wait for the anomaly but I have no system just play blind from the start, taking it from there
often as not I hit the bleedin favourite but usually find a way out, cut my micro loss or make small profits
no system just making best of what comes up



whatever I'm doing works because it collects 40+ an hour,
i got 2.4k (took 400 out) in around 6 weeks but as u say something strange probably lurks round the corner
most painful part for me is resisting larger sums/ almost impossible to resist doing this even when ur winning.
so far so good tho

I never understand you guys or gals when you say you can earn 40 quid an hour, just playing with little flat bets of 2 quid, and yet you complain how hard and unrewarding it all is.
If you can do it with 2 quid bets, then you can do it with 50 quid bets and make 1000 quid per hour.
So why don't you ?
Then you can retire to the Sth of France to your luxury villa with manservant and maid etc and bet from the comfort of your lounger at the side of your private swimming pool.
Give us all a break.

2 costing 6 blind then 50 cost 150 so ur trapped if you hit a fav that shortens. scaling up from that risks wipeout with a 5k limit

at least with 2, or even 1 gives room to scale up or cut losses to retrievable level. I tried to cut my profits to 25 an hour diluting risk further but theres no real need I feel

Doesn't make sense.
Scaling up something doesn't increase the percentage of risk.
Sure the numbers get bigger, but so does the capital you're playing with.
A risk of a wipeout is the same whatever, and the ability to recover is the same.
If somethng works small, then it works big, unless you hit a bet size that is not placeable.
I'm not saying you scale from 2 to 50 units in one go, but gradually as your accumulated winnings buiild up.

It took you 2 hours to come up with that load of garbage?

You talking to me sonny ?

That only took me 14 mins. Better for you sweetheart ?

I dont think.. its far to taxing,plus the rewards are the same.