Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
30 Aug 23
15:07
Joined:
Date Joined:
01 Mar 07
The fact that the end product is shìte is irrelevant!
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 10
|
By:
I think it is a big mistake. They should be paid out of revenues they derive. I Can understand money spent investing in women's cricket and paying salaries. coaches grounds but it must support itself.
I believe that women's football in Amrika could generate more money than men's football certainly for International Football. They have a huge untapped market and thousands of girls who play football who are looking for heroines and sponsors would pay them well. If women's football derives more money than men's football will they be happy subsidising their men? Women tennis players can earn huge sums for whatever reason players like Sharapova and Sabatini earned millions. This is a mistake. I play cricket. I would like to earn the same as a woman test cricketer. Why shouldn't I be paid the same? |
|
By:
15,000 quid for a test match isn't huge money.
Could probably get that bowling a wide off first ball after lunch. |
|
By:
the money they et should be related tio the income they generate irrespective of their sex
|
|
By:
get
|
|
By:
£15,000 a Test is huge. Where does that money come from? Maybe the men should be laid more than £15,000 a Test. I know how much J pay for tickets and beer!
|
|
By:
You could just do away with men and womens teams and just have a team, then you are payed if you qualify for the team regairdless of if man or woman
|
|
By:
Not long ago the women's team was beaten by an Under 19 Boys team.
That tells you everything. |
|
By:
Or was it Under 17?
|
|
By:
U12
|
|
By:
^^^
 |