Cricket
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
18 Oct 21
18:39
Joined:
Date Joined:
21 Jun 02
On yer bike man.
Show More
It’s been won on the bridle but it was that one shambolic over from Jordan that did for them
Length balls to a hitter you couldn’t make it up 
Like to see the big fat bald geezer in the crowd now
Jimmy NEESH that won it - assuming they do ...27 off 11 just when the game was virtually done
didn't see Kiwis winning from the hole they'd dug themselves..fair play
Eng went 1.05 and 1.9x on o/r
kiwis went 30 odd on the o/r for some fair wedge
one cannot deny,even as a detractor of this format,that it is nothing if not exciting
lots of nuances in 240 balls
Eng went 1.05 and 1.9x on o/r
kiwis went 30 odd on the o/r for some fair wedge
one cannot deny,even as a detractor of this format,that it is nothing if not exciting
lots of nuances in 240 balls
They never looked like winning until Morgan lost the plot
Thanks, Eoin
Thanks, Eoin
What can you say after that other than very well done the Kiwis.
Should have bowled Rashid for 17th over or even tried Moen and kept Jordan for 18th and 20th.
I understand Neesham could have taken Rashid apart but he could also have been caught and given NZ the questions.
Poor from Morgan in his last game as Captain!
I understand Neesham could have taken Rashid apart but he could also have been caught and given NZ the questions.
Poor from Morgan in his last game as Captain!
Well I did suggest it might be interesting if someone got 70+ although to be fair Neesham was the catalyst for England falling apart.
Woakes is the new Stokes? That was a dreadful over.
Woakes is the new Stokes? That was a dreadful over.
is the use of signals from the dressing room legal?
This has been a salutary lesson for English cricket.
Big Limited Overs Cricket international matches are won by players who can deliver with batting, bowling and fielding when the pressure's on, particularly of course during the closing overs.
It just isn't enough to wear T-Shirts bearing ludicrous 'Woke' slogans like "We Stand Against Transphobia".
Big Limited Overs Cricket international matches are won by players who can deliver with batting, bowling and fielding when the pressure's on, particularly of course during the closing overs.
It just isn't enough to wear T-Shirts bearing ludicrous 'Woke' slogans like "We Stand Against Transphobia".
That penultimate over from Jordan was appalling. For someone regarded as our best for the that phase it was not acceptable. But I guess the overall result was justice for the final the kiwis didn't deserve to lose. Hope they win it now.
On Australia but Pakistan going along nicely here
Thought they peaked in the group games Pakistan
New Zealand should have won the WC because they lost two wickets less in their 50 overs, always thought the ruling on that was stupid
Thought they peaked in the group games Pakistan
New Zealand should have won the WC because they lost two wickets less in their 50 overs, always thought the ruling on that was stupid
I really liked Pakistan at 1.9 earlier.
Let's just say things are going to get interesting.
and wow!
Let's just say things are going to get interesting.
and wow!
A big swing after the wicket, but is it too much? Pakistan still in a strong position.
Pressure all on Pakistan now. they have to start swinging. What I don't get is why they don't push singles and wait for the bad balls against the spinners? Too many dots balls will cost them.
you are never really sure how it will go until the either side start throwing the bat around, towards the end of the innings I suppose. A handy score can start to look insufficient after the chasing team hit a few boundaries.
One word
Shaheen Shah Afridi
Aussie openers know it too!
Shaheen Shah Afridi
Aussie openers know it too!
This Isa Guha is excellent. It's a pity that football don't have a female commentator/presenter anywhere near her level.
What are you watching on?
I am on sky
Haven't heard here I don't think
I am on sky
Haven't heard here I don't think
yes, the digital one, which I don't like, but needs must
Really great game this cricket.
I really thought Aus were shot to buggery earlier in the Tournament but their bowlers have been solid. Lets see if their batters mettle is the same. I don't think so but when you have a target it can get easier.
I really thought Aus were shot to buggery earlier in the Tournament but their bowlers have been solid. Lets see if their batters mettle is the same. I don't think so but when you have a target it can get easier.
If this gets near 180 or even over 180 Aussie will really struggle to chase it down. Pakistan too much in the attack and I would expect regular wickets.
making a mess of this finish Pak - looked like they'd broken it open after the big over..still a pretty challenging total
Aussies could keep it under 170, which would be a pretty decent result after all
that takes some effort to chase imo..dew obviously still could be a problem but if it stays reasonably dry not sure the aussies have it in them on this kind of surface..Pak have looked as good a bowling unit as any so far.
1.61 for Pakistan. Is that a tad low? or about right?
I couldn't make them (pak) longer personally but if the ball becomes like a bar of soap could make the spinners especially struggle..
I've got a small green on Pakistan, might back the Aussies if/when they go big odds against.
I said before I thought Finch particularly and Warner were flat track bullies but can't really blame Finch for that!
I think today will depend on Maxwell if Aussie are to get even near this total!
I think today will depend on Maxwell if Aussie are to get even near this total!
these price swings seem crazy to me, although I don't watch cricket all that much
yep t20 markets are a bit of organised chaos in general...approach with caution !
Pak needed that..not sure why Smith wasn't just getting Warner on strike..
Impressive from Warner. Another bug bear U have is he slows down as he runs out of energy but he is playing superbly. Time for The Big Show. I still think it is all about him.
Oz have p1ssed this
other than SSA much vaunted Pak bowling has been dogsh1te
other than SSA much vaunted Pak bowling has been dogsh1te
nice timing jtb...but agree they've been poor to this point with the ball...
Aussies go 2.75 from 1.64 in one ball, albeit a an important wicket. 
told ya
thing is still fancy Oz
big hitters to come
big show,Stoinis,Wade,Cummins,Starc can all hit a long bowl
Pak need more wkts or they're still toast imho
thing is still fancy Oz
big hitters to come
big show,Stoinis,Wade,Cummins,Starc can all hit a long bowl
Pak need more wkts or they're still toast imho
That is nit as bad as it seems for Aus. I do believe Warner would have slowed down and they still have 3 or 4 big strikers of the ball. Plenty of time still for Aus
Why did he walk? I didn’t think he nicked it either!
Why did he walk? I didn’t think he nicked it either!
the only two bits of advice for t20 betting Des - is keep your exposure levels in your comfort zone and never be in too much of a hurry to back an odds on shot..
gets the heart rate up as it is..
gets the heart rate up as it is..
Could have thrown in Starc at this point for a big if fun
this Wasim presents no danger to a batsman i can see..fking sh1te imho
taken some decent catches tonight...that the pick of them
all the contumely Warner got 4 the ball tampering
he's actually an honest guy and always give his all
can't think too many would've walked in his situation
unless hawkeye didn't pick up an infinitessimally slight nick that he only knew and remained undetected by the robot eye
he's actually an honest guy and always give his all
can't think too many would've walked in his situation
unless hawkeye didn't pick up an infinitessimally slight nick that he only knew and remained undetected by the robot eye
this is still well on for Oz barring falling wkts..only 11/over with 6 to go
I think he's a terrific cricketer but has a fair bit of previous to suggest he's not an especially decent bloke..assume he just thought he had hit or as you say was not picked up for some reason..they still had a review didn't they ?
fair enough jmdc - didn't see it ...any ideas why he didn't review ?
jeez...just seen the replay...must be the handle clicking surely...
though you'd actually expect even that to register a ripple on the snicko..
Oz would be v disappointed to not win it from here
if Pak had some SSA doppelgangers they would be ok but they haven't
if Pak had some SSA doppelgangers they would be ok but they haven't
Fantastic game
Very impressed with Aus fight back
Very impressed with Aus fight back
1.74 Oz?..should be 1.1..inconceivable they don't win from here
just haemmorhaging runs
just haemmorhaging runs
the win predictor must be skint by now on the back of yesterday as well...
SSA has developed into a fantastic money bowler
but his bowling homies have cost Pak the match
bowling pies
but his bowling homies have cost Pak the match
bowling pies
good shout jtb...some finish from Wade..
both semis won from big odds against during the chases..
both semis won from big odds against during the chases..
well..Des..had been backing Pak to win it all but when the 5th Oz wkt went down backed Oz at 11.5 on o/r and 6 for this match so damage limitation but not the desired result
Their bowling was pretty ordinary
after only 14 off the 1st 3 overs they had the big one off Imad and then they were always never really struggling with the rr
Their bowling was pretty ordinary
after only 14 off the 1st 3 overs they had the big one off Imad and then they were always never really struggling with the rr
I ended up with a red of less than fiver on Australia, which I am pleased with given how much the odds swung, and the fact that I was only listening on Radio. 
Well done to the Aussies for beating the Unabbreviatables in a thriller.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539