Australia vs England, 2nd Semi-Final

Surely there must be an organization out there that is dedicated to preventing cruelty to Australians that can step in here

Dont even need a calc to eyeball it as being way off

now we can all exercise free speech

Looking like the most one sided match of the entire tournament. Bowlers demoralised, Roy and Root capable of 12 an over from here.

Jul 11, 2019 -- 4:12PM, SaveTheWhales. wrote:

now we can all exercise free speech

can now call a **** a ****

Lets hope Punter took out some  "insurance" on England

Jul 11, 2019 -- 4:10PM, wondersobright wrote:

Jul 11, 2019 --  4:05PM, Charlie wrote:Jul 11, 2019 --  4:00PM, wondersobright wrote:bat 1st win the game is bolloxit was a fresh pitch today & 2 pitch reports suggested it was 1 of the better pitches we've seen this event...lessening the benefit of batting 1stnot the dry filthy slow turners we've seen a lot of, particularly in games involving 1 particular countryhence the aus drift was all the smart people accommodating this win the toss win the game bolloxI can almost agree with that apart from what the stats say. Money for a team means nothing. I'll have to check above but did you say that at the time?I've got all the stats & if you re-read the thread you will see that I said earlier batting 1st is an advantage but not much of 1 this game for the reasons I've givenand that's why aus drifted back out having shortened on the toss newsso spare me the lecture ta

I've looked but not diligently so please quote where you say these things.

Ta.

no you'll have to re-read it all if you are that bothered

So I don't believe you then.

that's fine, you're now blocked

That's fine!

shot

Aus 78 for 3 after 20, 30 overs left, giving 61.6% of resources available, 38.4% of resources consumed
Team 2 with 20 overs have 56.6% of resources available

Team 2 Par score = Team 1 score x Team 2 Resources / Team 1 Resources
= 78 x 56.6 / 38.4 = 115

Can't believe how easy its been for England

Jul 11, 2019 -- 4:16PM, Angoose wrote:

Aus 78 for 3 after 20, 30 overs left, giving 61.6% of resources available, 38.4% of resources consumedTeam 2 with 20 overs have 56.6% of resources availableTeam 2 Par score = Team 1 score x Team 2 Resources / Team 1 Resources= 78 x 56.6 / 38.4 = 115

Aus have already batted and used up their resources, the only figure that matters from them is their final score

not out for me

82 runs England don't mess this up ffs

shame

hand off the bat??

lol roy is mad, he really wanted that ton

Same old Aussies always cheating

lol hit nothing

nowhere near it shocking decision

Saffer manners 4 u !

kumar guessing again

Roy to be banned for the final

Jul 11, 2019 -- 4:17PM, tomtimtum wrote:

Jul 11, 2019 --  4:16PM, Angoose wrote:Aus 78 for 3 after 20, 30 overs left, giving 61.6% of resources available, 38.4% of resources consumedTeam 2 with 20 overs have 56.6% of resources availableTeam 2 Par score = Team 1 score x Team 2 Resources / Team 1 Resources= 78 x 56.6 / 38.4 = 115Aus have already batted and used up their resources, the only figure that matters from them is their final score

Nah, not in a 20 over match, they set out to play 50 overs, the whole point of DLS is to equalise for the fact that they didn't know it would be less than 50

What a farcical decision.

hopefully he didn't tell Ginge to review

bairstow lbw looked plum as well

Jul 11, 2019 -- 4:19PM, Angoose wrote:

Jul 11, 2019 --  4:17PM, tomtimtum wrote:Jul 11, 2019 --  4:16PM, Angoose wrote:Aus 78 for 3 after 20, 30 overs left, giving 61.6% of resources available, 38.4% of resources consumedTeam 2 with 20 overs have 56.6% of resources availableTeam 2 Par score = Team 1 score x Team 2 Resources / Team 1 Resources= 78 x 56.6 / 38.4 = 115Aus have already batted and used up their resources, the only figure that matters from them is their final scoreNah, not in a 20 over match, they set out to play 50 overs, the whole point of DLS is to equalise for the fact that they didn't know it would be less than 50

but Australia used up their 50 overs so their score doesnt need any adjustment

which he reviewed immediately

I suppose that's why you don't use your review unless you're certain.

Jul 11, 2019 -- 4:20PM, tomtimtum wrote:

Jul 11, 2019 --  4:19PM, Angoose wrote:Jul 11, 2019 --  4:17PM, tomtimtum wrote:Jul 11, 2019 --  4:16PM, Angoose wrote:Aus 78 for 3 after 20, 30 overs left, giving 61.6% of resources available, 38.4% of resources consumedTeam 2 with 20 overs have 56.6% of resources availableTeam 2 Par score = Team 1 score x Team 2 Resources / Team 1 Resources= 78 x 56.6 / 38.4 = 115Aus have already batted and used up their resources, the only figure that matters from them is their final scoreNah, not in a 20 over match, they set out to play 50 overs, the whole point of DLS is to equalise for the fact that they didn't know it would be less than 50but Australia used up their 50 overs so their score doesnt need any adjustment

I'll re-read the regulations

This ain't over yet

Lose another 2 before needing less than 50 and its game on

if England were at a par score, their odds would in theory be close to evens not 1/100

Bairstow knew he was plumb out..just individual arrogance really esp seeing they were cruising

Whatever happened to Srichaphan or Ancic?

The use of reviews is a farce ! All the so called "big names" just review regardless !

Can't the umpires confer? Can't believe that the square leg would have agreed.

it was originally brought in to eradicate the howler

Jul 11, 2019 -- 4:22PM, johnnythebull wrote:

Bairstow knew he was plumb out..just individual arrogance really esp seeing they were cruising

It was Roy who told him to review, he's dug his own grave here I'm afraid!

I thought he reviewed it immediately but I could be wrong

Jul 11, 2019 -- 4:23PM, sageform wrote:

Can't the umpires confer? Can't believe that the square leg would have agreed.

only to see if it's carried but they have tv umpire for that

Im pretty sure he walked down to Roy and Roy told him to review but I could be wrong too

tomtimtum    11 Jul 19 16:24 
Jul 11, 2019 -- 4:22PM, johnnythebull wrote:

Bairstow knew he was plumb out..just individual arrogance really esp seeing they were cruising


It was Roy who told him to review, he's dug his own grave here I'm afraid!


so,instead of sticking his bat up Jonny's rectum he can stick it up his own

his reaction was bang out of order..he should really be banned for the final

just not cricket

will probably get a fine of half his match fee

and all of jonny's

Eng still in this tho..nil desperandum

Australia have to fancy it from here

England in all sorts of trouble

Someone just mentioned that South Africa collapsed from a similar position v NZ in 2011 1/4 final...............I wasn't following cricket back then.

Jul 11, 2019 -- 4:21PM, Angoose wrote:

Jul 11, 2019 --  4:20PM, tomtimtum wrote:Jul 11, 2019 --  4:19PM, Angoose wrote:Jul 11, 2019 --  4:17PM, tomtimtum wrote:Jul 11, 2019 --  4:16PM, Angoose wrote:Aus 78 for 3 after 20, 30 overs left, giving 61.6% of resources available, 38.4% of resources consumedTeam 2 with 20 overs have 56.6% of resources availableTeam 2 Par score = Team 1 score x Team 2 Resources / Team 1 Resources= 78 x 56.6 / 38.4 = 115Aus have already batted and used up their resources, the only figure that matters from them is their final scoreNah, not in a 20 over match, they set out to play 50 overs, the whole point of DLS is to equalise for the fact that they didn't know it would be less than 50but Australia used up their 50 overs so their score doesnt need any adjustmentI'll re-read the regulations

Going to have to adjust all of my spreadsheets now

Jul 11, 2019 -- 11:08AM, wondersobright wrote:

fresh pitch, both cork & bish both said good pitch in their reports...certainly a bat 1st pitch but not a game winner

bat 1st win the game is bollox
it was a fresh pitch today & 2 pitch reports suggested it was 1 of the better pitches we've seen this event...lessening the benefit of batting 1st
not the dry filthy slow turners we've seen a lot of, particularly in games involving 1 particular country
hence the aus drift was all the smart people accommodating this win the toss win the game bollox

I went all the way back to the start. So your two posts aren't saying the same thing.

Somebody copy and paste this if he has b=me blocked.

Jul 11, 2019 -- 4:31PM, Cardinal Scott wrote:

Someone just mentioned that South Africa collapsed from a similar position v NZ in 2011 1/4 final...............I wasn't following cricket back then.

in Bangladesh on an absolute minefield!

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/8039/scorecard/433602/new-zealand-vs-south-africa-3rd-quarter-final-icc-cricket-world-cup-2010-11

I see they were right

Unfortunately the first post didn't appear in it's entirety but the time is there.

Maybe as well as giving the teams one review each they should give the umps one as well ! Fatty could have bailed Kumar out then

over 2 runs an over now..squeaky bum time

Jul 11, 2019 -- 4:32PM, Angoose wrote:

Jul 11, 2019 --  4:21PM, Angoose wrote:Jul 11, 2019 --  4:20PM, tomtimtum wrote:Jul 11, 2019 --  4:19PM, Angoose wrote:Jul 11, 2019 --  4:17PM, tomtimtum wrote:Jul 11, 2019 --  4:16PM, Angoose wrote:Aus 78 for 3 after 20, 30 overs left, giving 61.6% of resources available, 38.4% of resources consumedTeam 2 with 20 overs have 56.6% of resources availableTeam 2 Par score = Team 1 score x Team 2 Resources / Team 1 Resources= 78 x 56.6 / 38.4 = 115Aus have already batted and used up their resources, the only figure that matters from them is their final scoreNah, not in a 20 over match, they set out to play 50 overs, the whole point of DLS is to equalise for the fact that they didn't know it would be less than 50but Australia used up their 50 overs so their score doesnt need any adjustmentI'll re-read the regulationsGoing to have to adjust all of my spreadsheets now

there's a few apps on google play store that aren't 100% accurate but close enough within a few runs if you want something to test it against or can't be bothered writing new sheets

2 an over?

only 8 in the shed

Its on like fat pats thong

Morgan looks more out of nick than Guptill

What price for Australia in the final?

What match in this WC did Mark Wood get interviewed after the first innings where he said something like "I hope they don't need my batting" before going on to lose? 

Think it was Sri Lanka.

After the first innings today, Archer said something very similar

Aussies really happy that Starc chose the semi final to bowl this pile of sh1te

Aussies need a wicket?

Otherwise England might get confident of chasing this down

Remember when Eng won @500/1?

OZ have been woeful

Are England actually going to win this thing?

After the last Australia match I was convinced it was done and they wouldn't make the semis, now they are hot faves in the final

They'll never have a better chance!

england on for 400 here...

who should be PLAYER of the match? Roy or Woakes

Depends who is deciding, a batsman and its Roy, a bowler gives it to Woakes.
Woakes for me.

what a performance from the greatest ODI team in history!

What a masterclass by England, lets hope they go on and finish the job.

let the free-to-air ****torm begin.....

its on FTA DS already

Well done England and good luck in the final

Australia were pants from start to finish

so it is. didn't realise that....

New Zealand will not want to lose back to back world cup finals though

Well done Roger!

Are New Zealand going to do the haka before the final?

https://youtu.be/VpvWbYeXu_s

Get ready lads

Has any other team been as short as England at 1.33 in cricket world cup final ? it does feel a little short IMO

England team under pressure. What pressure, 3 top teams swotted like flies.

   
Don Bradman, Ned Kelly, Nicole Kidman, Rolf Harris, Dame Edna Everage,   
  Steve Irwin, Rupert Murdoch, Kylie Minogue, Shane Warne,
             YOUR BOYS TOOK A HELL OF A BEATING   

Sky will make the final of the Cricket World Cup between England and New Zealand free-to-air by partnering with Channel 4.
Sunday's match will also be shown on Sky Sports.

More follows...

Nice of SKY to be honest

Not every day we make a final

Good chance of being World Champions here

New Zealand might fancy their chances as well though

Both going for their first and both under pressure, but the home side will feel it most in my opinion

Sky are following BT Sport after they made the Europa League and Champions League finals available

new zealand's problem is they don't really have any sort score in them at the moment. think they've only got over 250 once in the tourney. will need to be a tough wicket like old trafford to bring them into the game

cricket know the lack of free to air coverage has hammered them.

sky should get more contracts for playing ball, and sell more contracts on top.



its free on betfair video, and no adverts, takes some beating!

holy feck ENgland are in the final!

Sick beat for anyone who backed Warner to be top tournament bat

England are a ridiculous price to win the game, but I really cannot see them not winning it. Overall they have the best batting line-up for 50 over cricket in the world, while New Zealand struggle to score runs with only Kane Williamson and Ross Taylor scoring many runs. Now Martin Guptill could finally come good to get New Zealand off to a quick start, but when your out of form, its hard to get going again. Englands bowling unit, is at least equally as good as New Zealands and this England side really look like they want it. I won't be betting at the prices, but I'm expecting the World Cup to bein Eoin Morgans hands come sunday late afternoon/early evening.

Jul 11, 2019 -- 10:22PM, tomtimtum wrote:

Sick beat for anyone who backed Warner to be top tournament bat

I did. Cashed out yesterday. Should have backed Sharma, but didnt pull the trigger.

i have just taken a look at my account and thankfully even after todays 850 loss I am not as badly placed as i had thought. But i'd have used these 850 gooing into the tests

*i could have used

*i could have done with?