Cricket
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Chittagong win toss and bowl first.
Rangpur look a lay at 1.74 No Gayle or De Villiers
How can Hales get away with snubbing Engs tour of Bangladesh yet take the T20 money?
Rangpur look a lay at 1.74 No Gayle or De Villiers
How can Hales get away with snubbing Engs tour of Bangladesh yet take the T20 money?
Show More
Typical BPL, 100 all out in first match and 2nd match it looks like the team batting first will post 230+ !
Dhaka have all the umps in their pocket, along with some of the oppo.
No wonder they win every game
No wonder they win every game
We don't get to see Pollard and Russell batting together very often.
lose on every run line except 190-195
Max loss now though is 2.5k on 200 runs or moe
Max loss now though is 2.5k on 200 runs or moe
made just over 1k in the end after scrambling like a mutha fcuker
that catch not given behind at the start was unreal, and the 3rd ump turned it down too on review.
Most blatant cheating I've seen for a long time
Most blatant cheating I've seen for a long time
I seem to have hopped on Comilla Victorians at 2.02
And got out at 1.88 as I see no reason why they should have shortened, modest start.
thought i would follow this game,my 1st look at the BPL this year
18 for 5
thats enough for me
18 for 5
thats enough for me
Jan 8, 2019 -- 11:32AM, Cardinal Scott wrote:
And got out at 1.88 as I see no reason why they should have shortened, modest start.
Modest start indeed ....leading to 63 all out lol
Chittagong Vikings v Sylhet Sixers
Another low score by the looks of it.
Another low score by the looks of it.
Interesting 365 has a different scorecard to cricinfo's..
The ICC or some of the top brass must be getting well oiled to allow this level of fixing.
It's impossible to play at the same ground on similar wickets and get this level of deviance on the scores.
First few games were low in afternoon and now vice versa.
I would advise all forum members to stay well clear of this.
It's impossible to play at the same ground on similar wickets and get this level of deviance on the scores.
First few games were low in afternoon and now vice versa.
I would advise all forum members to stay well clear of this.
I've only bet on two games.
One where I fell asleep and lost from a green position & a flukey one where they made over 190.
Charlie, it doesn't affect you as you use the same strategy every game.
Anybody trying to analyse the players/ground/scores etc are fcuked as there is some serious skullduggery on show.
Juce
You don't change a winning strategy until it no longer makes money and there's no sign of that yet
. I don't mind skulduggery or supposed skulduggery or cheating or anything.
You don't change a winning strategy until it no longer makes money and there's no sign of that yet
. I don't mind skulduggery or supposed skulduggery or cheating or anything.
Just noticed Perera's knock last night, he must be the best short form hitter at the moment!
Jan 13, 2019 -- 7:30PM, Charlie wrote:
JuceYou don't change a winning strategy until it no longer makes money and there's no sign of that yet . I don't mind skulduggery or supposed skulduggery or cheating or anything.
skullduggery can fcuk you if you are trying to trade the game
This tournament ought be disbanded, it's an absolute disgrace.
And I love a low score!!
Just watched the highlights and they were at it.
Two obvious lbw reviews and the batsmen just walked off.
Add to that a few batsmen just playing completely the wrong line (missing the ball by a distance!!) , which stinks to high heaven against doghs1t bowlers.
There was turn but all they had to do was wait until the ball was sodden and smash it to all parts
And I love a low score!!
Just watched the highlights and they were at it.
Two obvious lbw reviews and the batsmen just walked off.
Add to that a few batsmen just playing completely the wrong line (missing the ball by a distance!!) , which stinks to high heaven against doghs1t bowlers.
There was turn but all they had to do was wait until the ball was sodden and smash it to all parts
Full of cricket trading energy and bugger all else on so I might have a crack at the 2nd game today.
Sylhet disgraced themselves yesterday do they have bouncebackability? In recreational mode I reckon so.
Looks very likely to me that Sylhet have lost toss and will bat. I am happy with that
Massive drift on Sylhet must be coz they lost toss and will bat
Now they are making their way back down which is pleasing
Sylhet Sixers (Playing XI): David Warner(c), Liton Das(w), Afif Hossain, Jaker Ali, Nicholas Pooran, Sabbir Rahman, Alok Kapali, Sohail Tanvir, Sandeep Lamichhane, Taskin Ahmed, Mehedi Hasan Rana
Rangpur Riders (Playing XI): Chris Gayle, Alex Hales, Mohammad Mithun(w), Mehedi Maruf, Rilee Rossouw, Benny Howell, Mashrafe Mortaza(c), Nahidul Islam, Farhad Reza, Sohag Gazi, Shafiul Islam
Rangpur Riders (Playing XI): Chris Gayle, Alex Hales, Mohammad Mithun(w), Mehedi Maruf, Rilee Rossouw, Benny Howell, Mashrafe Mortaza(c), Nahidul Islam, Farhad Reza, Sohag Gazi, Shafiul Islam
I'm deliberating whether to green up now and wave goodbye
Decent recovery from what looked absolutely hopeless position, not trading any more but keen to see what happens.
DRE IS AT IT AGAIN!
When you're going at 340 SR its a good idea not to run yourself out
Refuse to bet on this junk anymore.
But seen a larger sum of cash than usual AGAINST SYLHET.
Maybe paranoid but somethings smells.
But seen a larger sum of cash than usual AGAINST SYLHET.
Maybe paranoid but somethings smells.
Never got any of these to save me money, now 2 come in a row
still dont understand why they havent changed it to include the super over, they cost thesmevles so much commission over a year!
Jan 2, 2020 -- 4:31PM, MrFancyPants wrote:
wouldn't they settled it as dead heat?
no, its def a void, its in the rules
Who will win this match? At the start of scheduled play all unmatched bets will be cancelled and this market will be turned in-play. This market will not be actively managed therefore it is the responsibility of all customers to manage their own positions. If scores (including a derived target score using the Duckworth Lewis method) are deemed tied at the completion of both innings then all bets on the Match Odds market will be void. Please note there is a separate Tied Match market available for this game. For the avoidance of doubt, if scores are tied at the completion of both innings then any tie breaker that may be used to determine a winner including, but not limited to, bowl outs, Super Overs, one-over eliminators, losing fewer wickets, run rates, coin toss, higher group position does not count for the purposes of this market.
Jan 2, 2020 -- 4:32PM, GRANTCKING wrote:
Jan 2, 2020 -- 4:31PM, MrFancyPants wrote:wouldn't they settled it as dead heat?no, its def a void, its in the rules
If a match is declared "No Result'', bets will be void on all markets for the event except for those markets which have been unconditionally determined or where the minimum number of overs have been bowled as laid out in the market specific information.
but super over should be far from "no result" right?
there is no other thing stated as a tie.
a tie has been a void for years, they dont want to change this for some reason
I cashed out for 113 and voided mine.wont be betting on here anymore if I don’t get paid out that is an absolute joke
u dont get paid out even if u cashout, u have to back a tie in the 3 way match market to insure your bet, its been complained about heaps of times but they dont want to change it to include super overs, its strange as it costs them money in commission
I always cover the tie if I have a decent green. Can normally do it for 80/1 or 90/1. If you dont want to do that, you win some and you lose some
it is stupid I agree, when a match is a tie and they void it they lose out on all their commission aswell as punters wasting their time
Managed to trade up a big green this game, although I did cover the tie, fortunately, although not for nearly as much as I was winning on the chase coming in. Oh well, it was a green, at least, after a quiet BBL loss.
These streams are so far behind. Killing off inplay betting.
Jan 2, 2020 -- 6:51PM, cufcno1 wrote:
I didn’t know it’s **** stupid
Youve bet on someone to win the 20 overs.
Nobody did?
It says match odds, doesn’t give you a price for the draw if it did on the market I had bet on I wouldn’t have any complaints, you would just think either whoever wins the super over is the winner or dead heat rules would apply at the end of 20 overs, not void every bet it stupid
Double wicket maiden followed by a bog standard maiden.
Had enough of this. Always trust issues with this tourney.
Liton Das detractors are jubilant, the sod has just been cleaned up. (spectator only)
One of the shirt sponsors is Dettol, how appropriate.
Malik made it look impossible to score off. Russell made it look like it was impossible not to hit 6s. Gotta love cricket
the last no ball, i thought he was looking for an autograph of the batsman
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539