Cricket
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Adelaide Strikers (Playing XI): Alex Carey(w), Jake Weatherald, Colin Ingram(c), Matthew Short, Jonathan Wells, Jake Lehmann, Michael Neser, Rashid Khan, Cameron Valente, Billy Stanlake, Ben Laughlin
Melbourne Renegades (Playing XI): Tim Ludeman(w), Jack Wildermuth, Sam Harper, Cameron White, Tom Cooper(c), Mohammad Nabi, Daniel Christian, Cameron Boyce, Kane Richardson, Kelvin Smith, Usman Khan
Melbourne Renegades have won the toss and have opted to field
Melbourne Renegades (Playing XI): Tim Ludeman(w), Jack Wildermuth, Sam Harper, Cameron White, Tom Cooper(c), Mohammad Nabi, Daniel Christian, Cameron Boyce, Kane Richardson, Kelvin Smith, Usman Khan
Melbourne Renegades have won the toss and have opted to field
Show More
Back in the green, will start extracting myself SLOWLYY!
They are a back 10 over batting team, so wickets in hand leads to chaos is the plan.
Dec 23, 2018 -- 8:49AM, Cardinal Scott wrote:
6666666666666666666666666
444444444444444
I'm out of the market and redless, too many wickets.
Me too. Got a bit of green, but don't see an angle at the moment.
Feel like 180 is on here, but would rather wait for a wicket to get involved.
Not too many mi****, plenty of the singles have been smashed out of the middle.
Pitch looks a belter. Even with adelaide class bowling attack they will need around 170.
Need to start upping the ante though. Not enough aggression. Hard to get involved in this.
Pressure building, way behind where they should be. Laid Strikers instead.
Its the Rashid Khan factor pushing in Strikers too far.
This what Ed said:
Bat first, bat well and win. The average score at the Adelaide Oval in the last three years is 170. Go past that par score and the data shows teams win almost 89 per cent of the time. Even 160-170 is winning at a rate of 82. Not surprisingly there's a toss bias which stands at 67 per cent. It's also not surprising that Strikers are winning 68 per cent of the time batting first
Bat first, bat well and win. The average score at the Adelaide Oval in the last three years is 170. Go past that par score and the data shows teams win almost 89 per cent of the time. Even 160-170 is winning at a rate of 82. Not surprisingly there's a toss bias which stands at 67 per cent. It's also not surprising that Strikers are winning 68 per cent of the time batting first
Dec 23, 2018 -- 9:38AM, Charlie wrote:
This what Ed said:Bat first, bat well and win. The average score at the Adelaide Oval in the last three years is 170. Go past that par score and the data shows teams win almost 89 per cent of the time. Even 160-170 is winning at a rate of 82. Not surprisingly there's a toss bias which stands at 67 per cent. It's also not surprising that Strikers are winning 68 per cent of the time batting first
How often has there been a pitch like this and a 50 metre boundary though?
They bowled pretty well, pitch has quickened up, ball skidding on, they scored half those runs in about 7 overs, and were smashing the ball out of the middle for singles for the first 10 overs. Super fast outfield. Wickets were a wild swing edge behind, a mix up run out, and a skied ball, gave very few other chances, were middling the ball. Could well be enough, but does look a 180+ pitch to me.
I know lasses have the rope brought in but they still only beat them by 2.....There is game here.
Dec 23, 2018 -- 10:02AM, GRANTCKING wrote:
is this a total runway CS?
No but it is a nice surface
Dec 23, 2018 -- 10:13AM, GRANTCKING wrote:
why the odds against lol
Rashid Khan
Its mad market love that.....I know he's good but only has 18 balls left.
how do u miss a ball thats straight and doesnt turn
Dec 23, 2018 -- 10:36AM, GRANTCKING wrote:
officially no batting left
cant see what hamlins saying but I bet hes seething, hes always losing and seething!
I don't think Grant understands cricket, he calls GSM if a team loses a wicket or if the other team hits two boundaries, then decides if they hit another 4 they should be declared the winner. Lol.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539