Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
17 Sep 18
19:17
Joined:
Date Joined:
13 Jun 06
non-existant this week despite promised coverage 
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 107
|
By:
Sky were probably hoping Somerset vs Surrey would be the title decider.
|
|
By:
Last week i checked the listings and there was supposed to be a game covered on sky starting on the 18th so i re checked today and lo and behold there is now no game probably because Surrey have already claimed the title so i have checked for the 24th and there is supposed to be a game covered but its anyones guess if its going to be a promotion or relegation game as everything might be virtually settled by the penultimate round of fixtures.
|
|
By:
surrey v essex being covered apparently
the deadest of dead rubbers |
|
By:
More at stake with Warwickshire vs Kent.
|
|
By:
Comcast are taking control of Sky soon and being yanks they might say why are we investing in cricket.
|
|
By:
surrey look a decent bet to me @ 8/13 dnb
GL |
|
By:
 |
|
By:
great delivery
|
|
By:
48-5, minefield
|
|
By:
oval rarely is coop but 150 might be ok 1st up
|
|
By:
54/6
|
|
By:
he is guessing wharfe
|
|
By:
 55-7 |
|
By:
v poor
|
|
By:
I know this is a dead rubber but this is a team unbeaten this year & choosing to bat ffs
|
|
By:
dropped!
|
|
By:
Lovely way to promote conty cricket this, newly crowned champs currently 62-9 no wonder Indians have no interest in btting on these games.
|
|
By:
67 all out wtf!
|
|
By:
Roll on the lasses T20 at 5.30pm Windies v Saffers!
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
about 6 totals under 80 just in recent weeks. must have been many others too. essex won a game after getting knocked over for 50 at the start of the season
|
|
By:
My entry was £50 win Surrey at 1.98 when they were 2 down.
Essex currently showing this is far from a minefield. |
|
By:
suppose you're always taking a chance backing a side the match after they've won a championship or got promoted
|
|
By:
What a signing Murali Vijay is proving!....get a man with ability who may feel wronged and you're often onto a winner.
|
|
By:
the oval is rarely a mindfield, the ball did a bit this morning but surrey just didn't apply themselves with their batting
|
|
By:
looks like lanky might somehow survive now if they can scrabble their way to 300. if it happens will have been a spectacular collapse by notts. think they won 3 of the first 5 games
|
|
By:
lol then they lose 3 wickets for 0. rather sums up the woeful standard of batting in the championship this season
|
|
By:
relegated by 27 runs???
|
|
By:
they'll be going down on fewer games won as if seems likely they win and notts lose
|
|
By:
Lancashire were deducted one point for a slow over rate ( vs Yorkshire I believe). Serves them right- slow over rates are a blight on the game ( at all levels ).
|
|
By:
that's right. be 2nd year in a row relegation has been decided on a deduction for slow over rates
|
|
By:
£58.65 Green Essex
£682.51 Green Surrey £358.37 Green Draw Would be lovely if Surrey could somehow win this game (I dont know how) coz I have done over £500 on womens cricket since saturday that £5000 Essex lay of 1.05 at declaration was a good trade. |
|
By:
£500 lay at 1.05 ^^^^
|
|
By:
If you are patient you can squeeze some nice wins out of thin county markets....I shall miss them!
|
|
By:
Essex and now Surrey 2nd dig are showing what a SHOCKER of all SHOCKERS that 67 all out was.
|
|
By:
Just heard on comms Alastar Cook once nailed a T20 ton
 need to go and find that effort. |
|
By:
Ah so he did
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/jun/25/alastair-cook-essex-twenty20-hundred Wasn't following cricket in 2009 |
|
By:
Surrey 1 down....was banking on a double ton from Burns.
 |
|
By:
"Would be lovely if Surrey could somehow win this game (I dont know how)"
I DO NOW!....Surrey racing along and there is an outside Surrey could win this game which is absurd from where they were. Still got over £700 Green on them. |