Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
21 May 18
11:41
Joined:
Date Joined:
18 Jul 08
This is what we've got to work with today on the cricket front, not bad at all a fizture, opportunities will arise.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 132
|
By:
|
|
By:
Hants pretty short for me. Surrey has a decent to good side in the format. Started with a grand lot of Hants at 1.61.
|
|
By:
Surrey recent form, very very dodgy.
|
|
By:
Am I right in thinking the minimum overs per side to constitute a match is 10 in this competition?
|
|
By:
^^^Not sure about that but your post made me look at the weather for southampton and I see there is potential for thunder showers
 |
|
By:
Got a £4k lay of CMM yes at 1.06 so now expecting not even a whiff of a shower.
|
|
By:
Surrey win toss and elected to bat.
|
|
By:
Aegas Bowl may have some history about dodgy drainage.
|
|
By:
kyle abbot and sam northeast both miss out for hampshire due to injury
|
|
By:
My 1st visit of the year to the old faithful http://www.raintoday.co.uk
|
|
By:
what a runway
|
|
By:
At this level Elgar shouldn't be liability but he no dasher.
|
|
By:
Very nice Hamps drift.
|
|
By:
Not very optimistic about my CMM yes lay although at 1.06, not very costly and the market may allow me to get at least a decent chunk off at 1.09 or so. Won £350 on the toss anyway so that’s nice. I didn’t get my second lay of Hamps fully matched at 1.57 but still going well and got a chunk back at 1.94. The Surrey line up looks a specialist batsman or so short but Foakes is a far better List A player than most specialist bats and hopefully SCurran and RClarke will do well at heaving the ball about at the end.
|
|
By:
I'm missing IPL liquidity here!
 |
|
By:
|
|
By:
I agree it's boring to follow.
|
|
By:
Flip makes up for dullness factor.
 |
|
By:
Have missed a back of Surrey I meant to fire off before the wicket fell and also failed to lay after it as busy but generally going very nicely, I’d say.
|
|
By:
Should arguably go green now but don’t really think 2.2 is great value and already have gone near enough even on Hants to have plenty of trading amunition on wickets.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
could see that coming a mile off, looked like he was going to under edge it 3 times in a row
|
|
By:
oh my, groundsman getting ready for a hurricane
|
|
By:
 what on earth is he doing, reverse sweep, what a retard |
|
By:
another wicket to a reverse sweep, do any of these batsman have a brain or what? |
|
By:
massive collapso from surrey
|
|
By:
Slurry are putting up a poor effort here.
|
|
By:
Ham,pshire chase 250 easily
|
|
By:
surrey where looking good for 300
|
|
By:
Pissing down in Cowes on the Isle of Wight. So rain around
|
|
By:
Hamps went down to 1.34 there.
|
|
By:
Would have been an excellent game to trade if I’d been paying attention. I haven’t and keep missing backs of Surrey then they lose another wicket. I’m in decent shape as have £900 green for only £100 Hants red but given that it’s been a perfect game for my trading approach, it’s a bit irritating that I’ve missed so many marks.
|
|
By:
Sorry, meant backs of Hants then Surrey lose another wicket. Obviously good to miss backing a side that then loses a wicket.
|
|
By:
41k Luymp just caused bedlam in the market.
|
|
By:
Hamps went out to 1.6
|
|
By:
just missed it
|
|
By:
This storm passed me about 45 mins passed. 14 miles from ground so reckon they will be on shortly as sunny here for 15 mind.fancy hants to chase 250 but top 3 need to fire as middle order week.
|
|
By:
5.45 restart
|
|
By:
reduced to 44 overs
|