Nov 26, 2017 -- 3:22AM, Cardinal Scott wrote:
I got my 1.7 Aus but that is very unfortunate.
nice one
Nov 26, 2017 -- 3:23AM, Cardinal Scott wrote:
Bairstow go on the attack! Full Monty style.....no 1/2 measures.
Not the right call. Woakes really can bat, so give him a chance to. Sure, play positively and go nuts if you get stuck with Broad, unless it looks like he's on and probably even if he does, because even the good version of Broad can be out any moment.
Nov 26, 2017 -- 4:08AM, jucel69 wrote:
14s to bat 42 more overs isn't a bad bet by any means.
When I bought the draw at 14 it was for a trade and I thought a bad bet. Now it's hardly moved despite 13 very obdurate overs of resistance I think buying it at 11.5 or so is a great bet. Some large lumps of money have kept it artificially high, I think. Of course, even if England bat all day, the draw is hardly a certainty as they aren't scoring quickly and even if they set 280 in 80 overs, they could bowl Aus out. I think it's a very generous price though, which is actually irritating as I had a massive draw green already and this just means I can't easily sell what I have off, because the prices feel wrong.
Nov 26, 2017 -- 4:23AM, Fatslogger wrote:
Nov 26, 2017 -- 4:08AM, jucel69 wrote:14s to bat 42 more overs isn't a bad bet by any means.When I bought the draw at 14 it was for a trade and I thought a bad bet. Now it's hardly moved despite 13 very obdurate overs of resistance I think buying it at 11.5 or so is a great bet. Some large lumps of money have kept it artificially high, I think. Of course, even if England bat all day, the draw is hardly a certainty as they aren't scoring quickly and even if they set 280 in 80 overs, they could bowl Aus out. I think it's a very generous price though, which is actually irritating as I had a massive draw green already and this just means I can't easily sell what I have off, because the prices feel wrong.
If they last til tea, it will be back to 7/8s
Nov 26, 2017 -- 4:27AM, jucel69 wrote:
that's fcuked that then, let Ball come in ahead of Broad please
I don't get all the dislike of Broad's batting. He's clearly got a good enough eye and technique to do better than he does but he does contribute sometimes and his test average is over 20. You'd not be wild about him at 8 but he's a plausible enough 9 and certainly better than Ball and Anderson.
Nov 26, 2017 -- 4:36AM, Fatslogger wrote:
Nov 26, 2017 -- 4:27AM, jucel69 wrote:that's fcuked that then, let Ball come in ahead of Broad pleaseI don't get all the dislike of Broad's batting. He's clearly got a good enough eye and technique to do better than he does but he does contribute sometimes and his test average is over 20. You'd not be wild about him at 8 but he's a plausible enough 9 and certainly better than Ball and Anderson.
It's the fact he looks scared that pisses me off tbf
Nov 26, 2017 -- 4:40AM, TerryHurlock wrote:
that shot jonny,jeeeesus
I know he was with the tail but he guided it to the man! I wouldn't mind if he'd had a huge heave trying to square cut it for 6 and got a top edge but that was horrific.
Nov 26, 2017 -- 4:43AM, jucel69 wrote:
2 wickets in the last over before tea, wank
Always likely to be a quick finish once Woakes out but I had some vague hopes of Bairstow and Broad thrashing the bowling everywhere.
Nov 26, 2017 -- 4:45AM, Cardinal Scott wrote:
This is problem of trading on day 5, you become completely stranded when getting on the draw for some tick trading under 20's
Which is why I tell myself not to do it but I usually do anyway! It's day 4, by the way but the point still holds.
Nov 26, 2017 -- 4:48AM, BJT wrote:
Ouch. 17k down the drain...
>one round amount too, old mate reaching for the rope
Nov 26, 2017 -- 4:50AM, TerryHurlock wrote:
f'k thats gotta hurt
anyone who bets under 1.1 heavily deserves to lose imo. Lazy betting
Nov 26, 2017 -- 10:04AM, trilby22 wrote:
Rain due tomorrow? Enough to prevent 55 runs being scored? I'll lay Oz for a few @ 1.01 & I'll take the draw at 360 for a giraffe
Easy to forget in the heat of battle that laying 1.01 is the same as backing the other two outcomes at odds of 200 apiece. If the odds are already higher than 200 and/or you're actually only interested in one of those remaining outcomes then the 1.01 lay is an unnecessary donation of value to the market.
Nov 26, 2017 -- 8:07PM, mafeking wrote:
woakes has been the real disappointment. no back up to anderson and broad whatsoever. he's better than he's shown here surely. can't expect much of ball. has hardly bowled in the warm up matches and he's about england 7th choice seamer with stokes, TRJ and wood missingscorecard gonna make it look like a comfortable win but england have really let australia off the hook here. should have had a lead of least 50 and 3 or 4 soft dismissals from well set batsmen - vince, malan, bairstow and moeen
hasn't looked fully fit since his injury in the summer
you are right to single out the batting, diabolical