Jan 16, 2017 -- 1:03AM, Fatslogger wrote:
Market quite excited he's come in: price not far from before the wicket fell.
NZ were 2.7 when the wicket fell
Jan 16, 2017 -- 1:03AM, detraveller wrote:
Jan 16, 2017 -- 1:03AM, Fatslogger wrote:Market quite excited he's come in: price not far from before the wicket fell.NZ were 2.7 when the wicket fell
Didn't say the same! Draw went from 1.7 to 2.3 back to 1.9 I think.
Jan 16, 2017 -- 1:06AM, detraveller wrote:
Sorry fats didn't understand you.
Often happens.
Think I'm screwed along with the draw here. Even 5 more overs potentially brings it back to life. Need Mushy back!
Jan 16, 2017 -- 1:09AM, tyco161 wrote:
Rahim in hospital till tomorrow just heard. Under observation
Bastard partisan Kiwi doctors.
Jan 16, 2017 -- 1:15AM, tyco161 wrote:
you lose 2 overs for change of innings as well..... so make that 56 overs.
Was counting that. So 217 off 57. That's too easy, I fear.
Jan 16, 2017 -- 1:17AM, tyco161 wrote:
draw should be 15's. So much time for NZ to score 217.
Against a decent attack on a track doing anything you'd think the draw perfectly possible with RRR over 3.5 in a test for over 50 overs but not this attack and this track. They won't even have to take many risks.
Jan 16, 2017 -- 1:19AM, jucel69 wrote:
160 on that deck, should be a steward's enquiry
Did have two retirements hurt, to be fair.
Jan 16, 2017 -- 1:19AM, detraveller wrote:
We'll be at the halfway stage for the day 10 min into the NZ innings. When was the last time a team bowled 57 overs in half a day?Still Bangla need early wickets to have some chance.
They may take at least a few overs to find enough subs too.
Jan 16, 2017 -- 1:23AM, detraveller wrote:
As much as i want it to end in a draw, it doesn't look like that.
It's possible but seriously unlikely.
Jan 16, 2017 -- 1:19AM, detraveller wrote:
We'll be at the halfway stage for the day 10 min into the NZ innings. When was the last time a team bowled 57 overs in half a day?Still Bangla need early wickets to have some chance.
new zealand make up there own rules
Jan 16, 2017 -- 1:28AM, slip5 wrote:
only way this ends draw is if new zealand lose early wickets
Probably needs wickets all the way through. It's possible the openers could start slowly then get out trying to pick up the pace a few overs in, which would be ideal but I don't see it.
Jan 16, 2017 -- 1:30AM, detraveller wrote:
Goodnight folks.
you on the wrong side mate
Jan 16, 2017 -- 1:35AM, Fatslogger wrote:
The draw was under 4 a few minutes ago and 1.7 a few minutes before that! Test cricket, wow. I'm normally a huge believer in laying my draw green almost all off when the price gets really low but I didn't see this game having a result.
it very rarely a draw these days
Jan 16, 2017 -- 1:36AM, tyco161 wrote:
Now Bangladesh's decision to declare really comes to bite them where it hurts. Declaring at 595/8 was never going to improve their chances of winning the game. They should have hit out and gone for as many runs as they could. Ironically had they had another 30 runs it would have given them a huge chance of drawing or winning this game but its those 30 runs that are going to leave them short today. Sad that a team scoring 595/8 dec is probably going to lose the test.
Thirty runs and 6 overs chalked off would be huge for the draw here, not worth much for the win. Was an odd decision not to hit out, certainly.
Jan 16, 2017 -- 1:41AM, tyco161 wrote:
like Jucel said the other day regarding draws. Most are rain affected. If no rain, pretty much no draw.
True but this was rain affected too!
Jan 16, 2017 -- 2:01AM, tyco161 wrote:
there we go Jucel, in the money already :)
do you think they will go to 9 down, or shut up shop at some point?
Jan 16, 2017 -- 2:05AM, slip5 wrote:
1 bad ball every over
short and wide and very very slow hit me ball
Jan 16, 2017 -- 2:02AM, jucel69 wrote:
Will Mushy's injury come into the equation re fair play??
hopefully new zealand get stripped off the trophy, bowling short balls to a man a with 1 working arm
Jan 16, 2017 -- 2:10AM, slip5 wrote:
bangla might win
now that would be a turn up!
Jan 16, 2017 -- 2:10AM, tyco161 wrote:
That 1.08 lay now looking pretty good isn't it. Test cricket, always lay the short odds.
Jan 16, 2017 -- 2:28AM, tyco161 wrote:
will there really be 38 overs in the last session... I guess there might be, especially if they keep bowling the spinners.
the way they batted, they must have wanted, been ordered to lose anyway
Jan 16, 2017 -- 2:30AM, jucel69 wrote:
Jan 16, 2017 -- 2:28AM, tyco161 wrote:will there really be 38 overs in the last session... I guess there might be, especially if they keep bowling the spinners.the way they batted, they must have wanted, been ordered to lose anyway
Why would Kayes have batted again then?
Jan 16, 2017 -- 2:33AM, Fatslogger wrote:
Jan 16, 2017 -- 2:30AM, jucel69 wrote:Jan 16, 2017 -- 2:28AM, tyco161 wrote:will there really be 38 overs in the last session... I guess there might be, especially if they keep bowling the spinners.the way they batted, they must have wanted, been ordered to lose anywayWhy would Kayes have batted again then?
he couldn't have not come out with a bad leg, would have looked even more suspicious