Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
15 May 16
10:15
Joined:
Date Joined:
05 Feb 02
Surely the rules should be changed so that either team winning the match before the six overs are bowled does not void the market? The current rules are against the spirit of betting as exemplified by the following scenario: Team batting first scores 150 in 20 overs. Team batting second replies with 26 sixes in a row. Bets that the second team would score more than 60 in their six overs would be voided as rules stand, which is absurd.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 2
|
By:
Whose rules are you talking about?
I haven't seen any bookie rules that voids bets that have already completed, in cases like this. |
|
By:
same here , all I have seen are void unless result is already determined, so that's a bad rule and not the usual one
|