|
By:
Expect another rip roaring raging spinner in Bangalore.
It's the same deck that did plenty in the SL V WI game & it's had 3 days more sun! http://www.hindustantimes.com/world-t20/world-t20-turning-pitch-in-focus-as-india-look-to-strangle-bangladesh-with-spin/story-M4KaeILWRjWzwhlWigvgsN.html |
|
By:
Brett Lee's hair
![]() |
|
By:
Bangladesh will bowl
|
|
By:
Bang win toss and bowl
|
|
By:
All I want from this game is a cheeky 50 from Tamim
|
|
By:
Is he playing?
|
|
By:
Tamim is back for Saqlaib Sajib
|
|
By:
what we backing>?
|
|
By:
"Tiny ground" , they said this last match and boundaries were 70m
|
|
By:
same pitch as SL v WI
|
|
By:
3 days drier
|
|
By:
Looking to back unders I think
|
|
By:
havent seen run line yet tho
|
|
By:
top indian batsmen Rahane 6.8 to lay, he isn't even playing!!
|
|
By:
FREE MONEY !!
|
|
By:
interesing because also same wicket Aussie's chased 157 easily on against Bangaldesh
|
|
By:
i think 170 is the score
|
|
By:
just laid rahane for 700 quid to make 100 as top batsman.
He isn't even playing ![]() |
|
By:
like charlie said surely it's void
|
|
By:
Apologies I'm wrong.
|
|
By:
No i'm not?
Who will be the Top Batsman for the quoted team in their respective innings? At the start of scheduled play all unmatched bets will be cancelled and this market will be turned in-play. This market will not be actively managed therefore, it is the responsibility of all customers to manage their own positions. This market will be settled if at least one run has been scored from the bat by the named team. Runs scored in Super Overs do not count for the purpose of this market. In the case of a named player being confirmed as a non-runner, bets on that runner will be void. Any runner that is selected in the original starting XI but does not bat will be settled as a loser. Dead heat rules apply. |
|
By:
I haven't got a clue, just saw it and mopped it all up
|
|
By:
In the case of a named player being confirmed as a non-runner, bets on that runner will be void.
|
|
By:
it's pretty obvious that it would void. Why wouldn't it?
|
|
By:
market thinks this is a high scorer
|
|
By:
I thought Juce would know as he did the same in the England game I think with Hales?
|
|
By:
Can't see how 170 can justify being 1.4x
|
|
By:
Me either, ive layed some
|
|
By:
Tired to lay 170 at 1.4 but no takers yet.
|
|
By:
I've laid 170
|
|
By:
Is the graph working for any of you?
|
|
By:
im started backing what i think will happen and not what the market will. Fed up of being burned by following the odds.
|
|
By:
At what Juce?
|
|
By:
*ive
|