England v Australia, 1st ODI at Southampton

that's a BIG unit lol

Big'un hahahhaa

I'm just the opposite!

RUN 2!

Wicker please

300 landed.

OOOOOOOOOH YEAHHHHHHHHH

Day bum bum, chickaaa chickaaaa

I blame myself. I ran out of Scotch. Have to pop out.

Glenfarclas?

England think they are a top one day outfit. Not with this reserve bowling line up they aren't.

I'm backing England. Good pitch, good batting line up, ok total

good luck with that rlacml
cant see it myself.
this pitch aint as good as you think
305 is around 40 above par

Do u know in todays fifa world rankings wales r 9th. thats some funny rankings list they have.

Thanks mate. England have to get off to a good start but I'm hopeful. Should be a good chase

Wales just over evens now. 9th is FIFA having a laugh. But maybe around 2.5 is worth a bet.

Think Aussies slight favourites so must be worth laying them at 1.42.

And playing chess at lichess if anyone fancies a game. 3+2

great start here from engerland

can they keep it going tho

Aussies 2.2 now

eng toying with the bangla bowling atm

Might cash for a while and bet later. But not decided. Would like 3.0 for us.

45 more minutes of this and it'll be a train.

I like Hales and Roy so glad to see they're doing well.

What does RLACML stand for?

My initials

I won't tell you my last name but you can guess the rest

Roger Leonard Anthony Colin Michael

lol

None I'm afraid

Rufus Leroy Aristolte Cuntface Marmaduke

Not far away with Cuntface

We should start a book on this. Rupert Lavendar Aresole Cuntfreckles Masterbater

Afraid not, but I do know a guy with the second name Bates. Master Bates

engerland doing this easily

I'll need to think a little. Any reason for me to cash out on England. Laid Aussies at average of 1.48

TIMBER

fck

odds dropped drastically

I need 85 from the first 15 for my fun bet. Messing it up

Close. GL

THAT HELPS

66666666666666666666666666666666

Well done

I should cash out now but??

no need to cashout chaz, engerland doing this easily

Only Maxwell as the slow bowler will prove the difference by the looks.  Unless he takes six.

There is one I guess.....

the  boneless wonders can throw this

Must admit I'm poor at cashing out.

I cashed a lot of my England out during the first wicket partnership at 2.32 and 1.88. Regret it a bit now but think markets slightly overreact to the first few overs so seemed sound.

We always have a reason for, and as i type fck

what a terrible way to get out, whys he coming down the ground to watson ffs

I know there's a clammaer to have him in the team but I wouldn't.

What I was going to say about cashing out was we all have a reason for doing it. And that reason is sensible at the time. But In cricket (amongst others) I can't get it right.

Somebody on the football thread (i think) mentioned this and I'm almost getting to the stage where cashout is'nt an option.

England's odds are obscene

Main reason to cashout in 50 over cricket, is because it is very rare for teams not to cruise the middle overs.  Slower scoring rate won't increase the odds too much, but wickets will destroy them.

In saying that, I have traded this innings terribly.  Up a few hundred, but took me about 4 entries to get it there, back, there again, back, and there again...

Few overs before I will be interested again, if I am still awake....

RR pressure really building here - I'm on Auss

Plenty of batting to come though

Sense a rash shot coming

There's plenty of scope for some faster scoring from these batsmen and a long way down. Think this is slightly in England's favour still, with what's left in the shed. Not quite confident enough of that to back again at 2.3 though.

england in deep trouble now, dear god I have red on aus aswell

Woeful tonight Stokes

Am keen on a bit of 3.8 though, if I can get it.

these 2 going to have knock off 80 off these runs b4 the next wicket

just feels too far for eng

buttler look lost out there

As I said, the odds are obscene.

cant let the rate get any higher than this

Sep 3, 2015 -- 8:38PM, RLACML wrote:

As I said, the odds are obscene.

in what way?

too big for engerland trader

England were 2.75 which I consider far too high.

GSM

Uhhhh ohhhh. Don't be silly

But now those odds are right

Sep 3, 2015 -- 8:46PM, RLACML wrote:

England were 2.75 which I consider far too high.

too low! hahahaa

buttler badly out of form, morgan had to bat through

Sep 3, 2015 -- 8:49PM, trader pj wrote:

Sep  3, 2015 --  8:46PM, RLACML wrote:England were 2.75 which I consider far too high.too low! hahahaa

Well, the situation has completely changed obviously

Relax Grant, lots of drama on here. It definitely isn't gsm

if it was 6 an over id agree RLA, it will be up to 9 within 4 overs here

Sep 3, 2015 -- 8:49PM, GRANTCKING wrote:

buttler badly out of form, morgan had to bat through

confirmed

Buttler is such a bottler. Whenever things get a bit tough he can't wait to get out from the middle.

My bad

only way they can now is if ali gets a 60 off 30

Which while very improbable, isn't impossible

problem is will be allowed to go for it?

or will england just accept losing by 40

Go for it

Rashid's gonna secure his motm

Do yah believe?

I wanna believe but I dont

they shouldve sent in ali before buttler and woakes, strange decision imo

He was in before Woakes

seems they don't wanna win

Sep 3, 2015 -- 9:08PM, RLACML wrote:

He was in before Woakes

sorry my bad!

GSM

why is Bairstow not playing after that NZ game

Even at 160-3 or whatever they got too i didn't even contemplate winning. The odds suggested they never stood a chance. THey were like 4/5 and 70-0