|
By:
Losing Trott? They have managed to make a complete hash of the series with the gutless players they have on the park already without wanting another even more gutless player out there.
|
|
By:
I believe England lost it mentally before they even started this current series. They believed it was a formality to win this series, thought they could just turn up and it would all fall into place just like it did in England. You could see the smug attitude as soon as they arrived, I remember one of the squad in an interview saying someone along the lines of... "we didn't play our best cricket in England but still won it 3-0" inferring "imagine what would have happened if we did play our best?" Full of themselves or what? Very accurately described by Swann in my opinion, some of them had their heads well and truly up their arses.
|
|
By:
That is why they are called Poms right? Short for pompous?
|
|
By:
Spot on Advantage Aussie, they thought all they had to do was turn up............... and it's now time to wield the axe. Anderson Panesar Prior Peterson should be offered the chance to announce their retirement from Test Cricket before they are dropped. Cook should be told unless there is a marked improvement in his performance he will be dropped. Only ones emerged with any credit from this tour, Broad, Stokes, jury still out on Root and Bairstow. .................. Bell should be listed as Missing in Action.
|
|
By:
i think there have been some uneasy friendships in england dressing room , which got by whilst
results were favourable, then its fallen apart when it went wrong in first test no overall control sfter that, as lifeboats were fought over funny old world |
|
By:
In order of magnitude, Lehman/Johnson, hubris, Clarkes captaincy, McDermott, Flower, Saker and Gooch, Cooks captaincy, Haddin, Trott.
This has been a spectacular rally by Australia inspired by Lehmans 'call to arms', and Johnsons wrecking of the England late order. Clarke has kept his foot on England's throat throughout. The bowling unit has been superb, lines and lengths near perfect and plans executed, McDermott must take a great deal of credit for that. By contrast England's back room has been a shambles, plans have unraveled within minutes of Cook taking the field, and as a consequence England have lost the first hour of play to Australia on day two,three,four and five of nearly every test, Selections have been mystifying, the batting order pure folly, and the bowling almost entirely reliant on Broad and reverse swing, which rarely eventuated. Cook is a poor captain, and will not score the big runs England need from him whilst encumbered by leadership. Haddin has played with immense, responsibility, intelligence and verve, and has tipped games back in Australia's favour throughout this series. On hubris and Trott, it's difficult to explain such capitulation without factoring arrogance, smugness and conceit into the mix and these are traits quite familiar in this current English side. And whilst it could be argued Trott was already a shot duck in this series, his early and dramatic departure sent important messages to both dressing rooms. |
|
By:
every1 seems to forget we were lucky to win in england 3 nil. 2 draws the aussies should of won, and 2 of the england wins really could of been aussie 1s [ ie if broad had walked aussies prob would of won that game, and the 1st test dodgy drs did it for england
|
|
By:
cobblers!
Aussie were an absolute embarrassment in England culminating with the debacle at Lords. A poor Australia just hid how ragged England had become. The Duke was the winner in that series! A mistimed declaration by Clarke could have cost Aussie 4-0 at the Oval but England were too dumb to realise that Clarke would cry like a baby with a few balls to go and the game lost. So much for Clarke's Captaincy. Then he wins the toss at the G and invites England into a match winning position. His bowlers and England's batters save his embarrassment AGAIN! How good would Brealey have been without Botham? How good would Clarke have been in this series without Johnsalez and Haddin combined with the total demise of the English batting and wrong bowling combinations?. I would say he was extremely lucky but you make your own luck and maybe he deserved it. England had Aus at 130 odd for 6 a couple of times and the lack of Finn may have saved them! That is not to say England did not capitulate! You don't need a degree in the Art of the Bleedin Obvious to see where England's problems are the bigger problem is where they go from here. |
|
By:
Poor old man is blind is a bat....
|
|
By:
whisperingseeth if my auntie had nads she would be my uncle."If" is a bigger cop out then the sky deity in low earth orbit.
|
|
By:
Eng believed their own publicity- only had a plan A-
picked 3 lamposts-tremlett clearly past it/finn ,not trusted &rankin ???/why not up to it. cling to the notion that the next poshest bloke should be capt imo-only broad & stokes emerge with any credit-root and bairstow hugely over=rated-i would keep bell and go back to prior in the future-not sure about any others- as for borthwick-he's batted well but bowling is not up to much-weird slection.... |
|
By:
root may be overrated but he deserves a place in the team on merit by some margin
cook kp bell root stokes broad onions panesar a wicket keeper.....id play kieswetter another batsman ......who knows ? rankin was the fastest ive seen last season so should be worth a look |
|
By:
Surely this taking the piss out of national selection has got to stop. Beyond a joke now. Ballance, from Zimbabwe looking to take his place for his test debut.
Was funny at first, but this is just ridiculous. 3 caps just been presented: Ballance, Borthwick and Rankin to make their debut. In place of I believe Root, Bresnan, and maybe Panesar? |
|
By:
borthwick is english !
|
|
By:
ballance has english grandparents !
|
|
By:
English grandparents born in South Africa?
![]() ![]() |