Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
That is the official margin in the first 3 tests of this series.
But between you and Junior Double 0, you can add in 15 wickets as well.
That is, Poms have lost 60 wickets for 1403, Aus have lost 45 wickets for 2152.
Aus average runs per wicket: 47.82, surely ranks pretty highly in Ashes series runs per wicket that.
England average runs per wicket: 23.38, surely ranks pretty low in Ashes runs per wicket for a team in a given series that.
Therefore Aus are averaging more than twice as many runs per wicket compared to the shameful Poms. Has this ever happened before?
Two of the last three series in Australia, England and Confederates have lost 8 of 8 matches.
I don't like to jump to conclusions, but fair dinkum, England are sh1t.
But between you and Junior Double 0, you can add in 15 wickets as well.
That is, Poms have lost 60 wickets for 1403, Aus have lost 45 wickets for 2152.
Aus average runs per wicket: 47.82, surely ranks pretty highly in Ashes series runs per wicket that.
England average runs per wicket: 23.38, surely ranks pretty low in Ashes runs per wicket for a team in a given series that.
Therefore Aus are averaging more than twice as many runs per wicket compared to the shameful Poms. Has this ever happened before?
Two of the last three series in Australia, England and Confederates have lost 8 of 8 matches.
I don't like to jump to conclusions, but fair dinkum, England are sh1t.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 5
|
By:
Junior Double 0 will be back later with some more facts and figures to help cheer grieving Pommy cricket supporters.
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
Only 30 posts since 2006, most of them today. I can't think why..........
 |
|
By:
Good spot Biscuit, nothing Junior Double 0 likes more than a good stat. You have correctly spotted there is a correlation between our team winning Ashes test matches, and the amount of posts we have.
So since 2006, Australia have won, let me see.........10 Ashes tests. That is an average of 3.1 posts per Ashes test victory for Junior Double 0. Not bad, perhaps I could have been a little less prolific in my celebrations, I accept that. For the purposes of this statistical exercise, I will presume Biscuit goes for the Poms. Biscuit has been around since 2010, mysteriously appearing when England and their multitude Confederate nations were enjoying a rare period of Ashes success. Since then, his team has won 6 Ashes tests. Biscuit has since then made no fewer than 42,477 posts. Quick calculation using the super calculator supplied to Junior Double 0 by Junior Q. 42,477/6 = 7,079 posts per Ashes test victory for Biscuit, and might I say that is quite impressive from biscuit. So Biscuit posts 7,079 times for every time his team wins an Ashes test. Junior Double 0 posts a measly 3.1 times per Ashes test won by his team. Hand me that calculator again Junior Q...... 7,079/3.1 = 2,283. So Biscuit posts 2,283 times more often per Ashes test victory than Junior Double 0 does, YET, is at pains to point out the proliferation of Junior Double 0 posts when the latter decides to post a few words of consolation for grieving English supporters after the worst Ashes trouncing since...well since 2006/7 I suppose. When Biscuit's team lost 0-5. In a 5 match series. I have heard of Pots making allegations regarding the darkness of kettles, but you might say this takes the Biscuit.  |
|
By:
Junior007 thinks very carefully about his posts
|